H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Guillermo Perez-Roldan vs Mel Purcell H2H: 1-0
Guillermo Perez-Roldan holds a 1–0 lead over Mel Purcell in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Guillermo Perez-Roldan leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Guillermo Perez-Roldan won the 1987 Munich semifinal 1-6 7-5 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 56
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 67
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 9, 1987* | Munich | ATP 250 | SF | Clay | Guillermo Perez-Roldan | 1-6 7-5 6-1 | Mel Purcell | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guillermo Perez-Roldan | #1,461 | #13 | 1,222 | 1,932 | 236 | 129 | 64.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 9 |
| Mel Purcell | #673 | #21 | 21 | 1,991 | 190 | 164 | 53.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Guillermo Perez-Roldan | Mel Purcell | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1986 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #109 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1987 | 40–15 | 72.7% | #19 | 1,809 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1988 | 43–19 | 69.4% | #18 | 1,835 | 0 | 4 | 1978 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #555 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1989 | 33–16 | 67.3% | #32 | 1,808 | 0 | 5 | 1979 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #245 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1990 | 41–21 | 66.1% | #14 | 1,788 | 0 | 6 | 1980 | 19–13 | 59.4% | #27 | 1,742 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1991 | 26–16 | 61.9% | #40 | 1,767 | 0 | 7 | 1981 | 48–20 | 70.6% | #24 | 1,914 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 1992 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #50 | 1,646 | 0 | 8 | 1982 | 38–24 | 61.3% | #28 | 1,837 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1993 | 19–11 | 63.3% | #82 | 1,755 | 0 | 9 | 1983 | 30–25 | 54.5% | #28 | 1,770 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #67 | 1,702 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #129 | 1,705 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1996 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #420 | 1,650 | 0 | 9 | 1986 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #72 | 1,649 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #140 | 1,529 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #268 | 1,537 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #504 | 1,525 | 0 | 3 |