H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Guillermo Perez-Roldan vs Paolo Cane H2H: 1-0
Guillermo Perez-Roldan holds a 1–0 lead over Paolo Cane in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Guillermo Perez-Roldan leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Guillermo Perez-Roldan won the 1989 Palermo final 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 56
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 61
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 1, 1989* | Palermo | ATP 250 | F | Clay | Guillermo Perez-Roldan | 6-1 6-4 | Paolo Cane | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guillermo Perez-Roldan | #1,461 | #13 | 1,222 | 1,932 | 236 | 129 | 64.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 9 |
| Paolo Cane | #1,381 | #26 | 565 | 1,835 | 121 | 122 | 49.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Guillermo Perez-Roldan | Paolo Cane | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1986 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #109 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1987 | 40–15 | 72.7% | #19 | 1,809 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1988 | 43–19 | 69.4% | #18 | 1,835 | 0 | 4 | 1983 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1989 | 33–16 | 67.3% | #32 | 1,808 | 0 | 5 | 1984 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #555 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1990 | 41–21 | 66.1% | #14 | 1,788 | 0 | 6 | 1985 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #199 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1991 | 26–16 | 61.9% | #40 | 1,767 | 0 | 7 | 1986 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #44 | 1,667 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1992 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #50 | 1,646 | 0 | 8 | 1987 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #51 | 1,707 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1993 | 19–11 | 63.3% | #82 | 1,755 | 0 | 9 | 1988 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #81 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 24–14 | 63.2% | #33 | 1,741 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #109 | 1,682 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1996 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #420 | 1,650 | 0 | 9 | 1991 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #122 | 1,684 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #163 | 1,654 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #177 | 1,596 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #145 | 1,598 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #635 | 1,581 | 0 | 3 |