H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Guillermo Vilas vs Balazs Taroczy H2H: 7-3

Guillermo Vilas holds a 7–3 lead over Balazs Taroczy in their ATP head-to-head. Across 10 main-draw meetings, Guillermo Vilas leads 7–2 on clay, while Balazs Taroczy leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Balazs Taroczy won the 1984 Indianapolis round of 16 3-6 7-6 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Guillermo Vilas
ARG Age 74 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
7 – 3
10 main draw meetings
Balazs Taroczy
HUN Age 72 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Balazs Taroczy #83 3-6 7-6 6-4 Guillermo Vilas #681 Match data Aug 10, 1984* R16 Indianapolis ATP 250 Clay
Balazs Taroczy #26 6-3 6-4 Guillermo Vilas #3 Match data Aug 15, 1982* QF La Costa Wct ATP 250 Hard
Guillermo Vilas #6 6-1 6-1 Balazs Taroczy #18 Match data Oct 10, 1981* QF Barcelona Open ATP 250 Clay
Guillermo Vilas #6 6-4 3-6 6-2 Balazs Taroczy #17 Match data May 24, 1981* QF Italian Open ATP 500 Clay
Guillermo Vilas #5 7-6 6-0 Balazs Taroczy #21 Match data Oct 11, 1980* QF Barcelona Open ATP 250 Clay
Guillermo Vilas #4 3-6 6-3 6-2 Balazs Taroczy #20 Match data Apr 12, 1979* R32 Monte-Carlo Masters ATP 250 Clay
Guillermo Vilas #2 7-6 6-1 Balazs Taroczy #32 Match data Aug 4, 1978* SF South Orange ATP 250 Clay
Guillermo Vilas #2 6-1 6-7 6-1 Balazs Taroczy #29 Match data May 28, 1978* SF Munich Open ATP 250 Clay
Guillermo Vilas 4-6 7-6 6-4 Balazs Taroczy Match data Apr 2, 1977* SF Nice ATP 250 Clay
Balazs Taroczy (def.) Guillermo Vilas Match data Oct 15, 1976* R16 Madrid ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Guillermo Vilas #1,186 #2 47 2,355 890 283 75.9% 4 0 1 3 54 62
Balazs Taroczy #732 #12 0 2,002 381 229 62.5% 0 0 0 0 13 13

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Guillermo Vilas Balazs Taroczy
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1968 1–1 50.0% — 1,506 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1969 3–3 50.0% — 1,548 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1970 2–4 33.3% — 1,533 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1971 1–1 50.0% — 1,538 0 0 1972 4–3 57.1% — 1,564 0 0
19 1972 18–15 54.5% — 1,691 0 0 1973 3–5 37.5% #193 1,554 0 0
20 1973 24–14 63.2% #31 1,854 0 1 1974 21–12 63.6% #38 1,771 0 1
21 1974 87–21 80.6% #5 2,175 0 8 1975 17–16 51.5% #69 1,822 0 1
22 1975 87–18 82.9% #2 2,134 0 13 1976 37–20 64.9% #31 1,849 0 2
23 1976 82–20 80.4% #6 2,104 0 19 1977 38–23 62.3% #31 1,852 0 2
24 1977 128–15 89.5% #3 2,340 2 35 1978 44–18 71.0% #20 1,908 0 4
25 1978 61–8 88.4% #3 2,234 3 42 1979 41–22 65.1% #42 1,814 0 6
26 1979 70–22 76.1% #6 2,092 4 46 1980 46–16 74.2% #22 1,930 0 9
27 1980 62–18 77.5% #4 2,038 4 49 1981 45–17 72.6% #15 1,939 0 11
28 1981 62–16 79.5% #6 2,035 4 52 1982 43–24 64.2% #27 1,864 0 13
29 1982 70–16 81.4% #4 2,016 4 59 1983 13–14 48.1% #52 1,783 0 13
30 1983 51–17 75.0% #11 1,949 4 62 1984 18–20 47.4% #43 1,751 0 13
31 1984 17–14 54.8% #28 1,792 4 62 1985 9–17 34.6% #157 1,645 0 13
32 1985 17–14 54.8% #39 1,768 4 62 1986 2–2 50.0% #382 1,642 0 13
33 1986 18–12 60.0% #22 1,760 4 62 — — — — — — —
34 1987 16–13 55.2% #71 1,718 4 62 — — — — — — —
35 1988 11–15 42.3% #126 1,630 4 62 — — — — — — —
36 1989 2–4 33.3% #408 1,601 4 62 — — — — — — —
39 1992 0–2 0.0% #463 1,577 4 62 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Guillermo Vilas Balazs Taroczy
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1968 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1969 — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1970 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1971 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1972 0 1 1 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — —
19 1972 1 2 3 33.3% 16 9 25 64.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 1973 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
20 1973 1 1 2 50.0% 23 12 35 65.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1974 3 2 5 60.0% 10 5 15 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7%
21 1974 7 3 10 70.0% 63 10 73 86.3% 12 3 15 80.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1975 1 1 2 50.0% 13 8 21 61.9% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 6 8 25.0%
22 1975 4 3 7 57.1% 71 11 82 86.6% 7 2 9 77.8% 5 2 7 71.4% 1976 4 2 6 66.7% 29 14 43 67.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
23 1976 9 3 12 75.0% 47 9 56 83.9% 7 2 9 77.8% 19 6 25 76.0% 1977 3 4 7 42.9% 29 16 45 64.4% — — — — 6 3 9 66.7%
24 1977 16 2 18 88.9% 90 5 95 94.7% 8 4 12 66.7% 14 4 18 77.8% 1978 7 3 10 70.0% 33 10 43 76.7% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4%
25 1978 11 2 13 84.6% 39 4 43 90.7% 11 2 13 84.6% — — — — 1979 4 3 7 57.1% 32 13 45 71.1% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0%
26 1979 14 5 19 73.7% 30 7 37 81.1% 16 2 18 88.9% 10 8 18 55.6% 1980 5 2 7 71.4% 37 9 46 80.4% 3 1 4 75.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
27 1980 13 5 18 72.2% 38 6 44 86.4% 6 2 8 75.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1981 0 1 1 0.0% 40 12 52 76.9% 2 1 3 66.7% 3 3 6 50.0%
28 1981 4 2 6 66.7% 55 9 64 85.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1982 2 1 3 66.7% 31 15 46 67.4% — — — — 10 8 18 55.6%
29 1982 10 3 13 76.9% 42 5 47 89.4% — — — — 18 8 26 69.2% 1983 — — — — 11 10 21 52.4% — — — — 2 4 6 33.3%
30 1983 8 3 11 72.7% 35 10 45 77.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 1984 6 9 15 40.0% 9 8 17 52.9% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
31 1984 5 4 9 55.6% 12 9 21 57.1% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1985 2 5 7 28.6% 5 9 14 35.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
32 1985 1 3 4 25.0% 16 11 27 59.3% — — — — — — — — 1986 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
33 1986 0 1 1 0.0% 18 10 28 64.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1987 0 2 2 0.0% 16 11 27 59.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1988 0 2 2 0.0% 11 13 24 45.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1989 — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 1992 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 105 47 152 69.1% 630 164 794 79.3% 70 27 97 72.2% 85 45 130 65.4% — 38 35 73 52.1% 286 134 420 68.1% 14 13 27 51.9% 43 47 90 47.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Guillermo Vilas Balazs Taroczy
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1968 1507 101.4 — — — — — — — 44.4% -0.67 1–0 — — 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1969 1548 110.0 — — — — — +33 — 52.4% 0.00 2–2 (50%) — — +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1970 1533 100.6 — — — — — +32 — 35.3% -1.24 1–1 — — +0.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1971 1538 109.3 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.40 0–1 0–1 — +0.32 1972 1565 121.5 — — — — — +57 — 52.6% +0.16 — 0–1 — +0.47
19 1972 1692 117.2 — — — — -135 +67 -207 50.6% -0.02 5–2 (71%) 4–2 (67%) — +2.75 1973 1554 107.9 — — — — — +43 -20 38.9% -0.61 1–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.06
20 1973 1855 142.4 — — — — — +66 — 60.5% +0.49 3–5 (38%) 8–5 (62%) — -1.97 1974 1771 134.2 — — — — -88 +24 -193 59.8% +0.47 6–6 (50%) 7–4 (64%) — +2.47
21 1974 2176 163.1 — — — — -398 +81 -339 74.5% +1.75 14–7 (67%) 6–7 (46%) — -3.67 1975 1822 144.6 — — — — -131 +46 — 52.8% -0.04 2–3 (40%) 6–2 (75%) — -2.56
22 1975 2135 164.8 — — — — -238 +124 -236 77.3% +1.83 11–4 (73%) 9–3 (75%) — -2.26 1976 1849 144.3 — — — — -88 +40 — 59.9% +0.80 12–6 (67%) 5–7 (42%) — +1.42
23 1976 2105 166.1 — — — — -55 +141 -116 74.3% +1.65 16–8 (67%) 15–17 (47%) — -2.39 1977 1853 149.0 — — — — -90 +29 — 60.8% +0.85 7–10 (41%) 5–5 (50%) — +1.51
24 1977 2341 167.8 — — — — -130 +71 -360 81.4% +2.13 26–4 (87%) 24–9 (73%) — -0.99 1978 1908 153.4 — — — — -103 +93 — 65.6% +1.25 14–8 (64%) 6–9 (40%) — +1.19
25 1978 2235 162.9 — — — — -67 +127 -120 78.4% +1.95 12–4 (75%) 8–5 (62%) — -0.26 1979 1814 149.3 — — — — -60 +157 -208 60.4% +0.93 12–7 (63%) 6–8 (43%) — +1.25
26 1979 2092 163.4 — — — — -76 +212 +65 70.9% +1.36 12–5 (71%) 18–12 (60%) — -2.83 1980 1931 156.3 — — — — -176 +80 -225 69.6% +1.32 9–6 (60%) 9–8 (53%) — -0.18
27 1980 2039 168.7 — — — — -56 +181 +106 72.7% +1.73 9–9 (50%) 10–8 (56%) — -3.22 1981 1940 157.8 — — — — -191 +103 -216 67.1% +1.22 11–6 (65%) 12–9 (57%) — -0.14
28 1981 2035 170.3 — — — — -90 +159 +3 73.8% +1.88 7–3 (70%) 7–7 (50%) — -1.85 1982 1864 151.2 — — — — -49 +58 — 58.3% +0.42 19–8 (70%) 15–10 (60%) — -0.65
29 1982 2016 167.5 — — — — -29 +191 — 75.6% +1.84 9–4 (69%) 10–7 (59%) — -2.32 1983 1784 148.0 — — — — +17 +44 — 46.9% +0.09 4–4 (50%) 2–6 (25%) — -1.31
30 1983 1949 163.8 — — — — +35 +145 — 72.0% +1.60 7–4 (64%) 11–7 (61%) — -1.46 1984 1751 140.2 — — — — -22 +109 — 49.0% -0.10 6–4 (60%) 7–12 (37%) — -1.48
31 1984 1792 143.4 — — — — +81 +158 — 51.9% +0.31 7–3 (70%) 7–6 (54%) — -1.09 1985 1645 133.7 — — — — +37 +90 — 40.0% -0.42 3–4 (43%) 4–8 (33%) — -1.57
32 1985 1768 139.4 — — — — +33 +113 — 54.1% +0.04 3–3 (50%) 7–2 (78%) — -1.45 1986 1643 107.5 — — — — — +109 — 40.0% -0.40 2–0 1–2 (33%) — +0.18
33 1986 1761 144.2 — — — — — +100 — 56.1% +0.62 7–4 (64%) 3–7 (30%) — -1.52 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1987 1718 134.7 — — — — — +82 — 55.1% +0.29 4–5 (44%) 4–5 (44%) — -1.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1988 1631 131.2 — — — — — +67 — 45.3% -0.17 3–7 (30%) 2–5 (29%) — -0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1989 1602 104.5 — — — — — +40 — 33.3% -1.53 1–1 1–0 — -0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 1992 1578 103.1 -2.21 -0.58 0.910 47.9% — — — 33.3% -1.17 0–2 0–1 — -0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2355 165.4 -2.21 -0.58 0.910 47.9% -88 +121 -141 70.6% +1.44 160–88 (65%) 154–116 (57%) 100.3 -2.17 — 2002 154.5 — — — — -76 +76 -183 59.2% +0.68 108–73 (60%) 86–93 (48%) 99.3 +0.11

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.