H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Guillermo Vilas vs Bill Scanlon H2H: 6-2

Guillermo Vilas holds a 6–2 lead over Bill Scanlon in their ATP head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on carpet, while Guillermo Vilas leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Guillermo Vilas won the 1983 Detroit Wct semifinal 6-3 7-6 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Guillermo Vilas
ARG Age 73 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
6 – 2
8 main draw meetings
Bill Scanlon
USA Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 29, 1983* Detroit Wct ATP 250 SF Carpet Guillermo Vilas #4 6-3 7-6 6-4 Bill Scanlon #71 Match data
Nov 6, 1982* Baltimore Wct ATP 250 QF Carpet Guillermo Vilas #4 6-2 6-0 Bill Scanlon #47 Match data
Jul 10, 1982* Gstaad ATP 250 SF Clay Guillermo Vilas #2 6-0 6-2 Bill Scanlon #41 Match data
Apr 2, 1982* Zurich Wct ATP 250 QF Carpet Bill Scanlon #42 6-4 6-4 Guillermo Vilas #4 Match data
Apr 4, 1980* Monte Carlo ATP 250 R16 Clay Guillermo Vilas #4 6-3 6-1 Bill Scanlon #34 Match data
Mar 20, 1980* Frankfurt ATP 250 R32 Carpet Bill Scanlon #41 6-2 6-1 Guillermo Vilas #4 Match data
Feb 14, 1980* Rancho Mirage ATP 250 R32 Hard Guillermo Vilas #6 4-6 6-3 6-4 Bill Scanlon #35 Match data
Sep 2, 1978* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Guillermo Vilas #3 5-7 6-4 6-3 Bill Scanlon #96 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Guillermo Vilas #1,186 #2 47 2,338 898 282 76.1% 4 3 1 0 55 63
Bill Scanlon #996 #9 56 2,017 307 259 54.2% 0 0 0 0 7 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Guillermo Vilas Bill Scanlon
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1968 1–1 50.0% — 1,507 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1969 3–3 50.0% — 1,549 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1970 2–4 33.3% — 1,533 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1971 1–1 50.0% — 1,538 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1972 18–15 54.5% — 1,693 0 0 1976 15–17 46.9% #52 1,651 0 0
20 1973 24–14 63.2% #31 1,851 0 1 1977 36–30 54.5% #37 1,723 0 0
21 1974 88–22 80.0% #5 2,171 0 8 1978 14–21 40.0% #95 1,764 0 1
22 1975 87–18 82.9% #2 2,129 0 13 1979 27–19 58.7% #41 1,839 0 2
23 1976 82–20 80.4% #6 2,079 0 19 1980 37–29 56.1% #25 1,808 0 2
24 1977 128–15 89.5% #2 2,303 2 35 1981 39–21 65.0% #30 1,879 0 5
25 1978 61–8 88.4% #3 2,216 3 42 1982 31–24 56.4% #71 1,852 0 6
26 1979 70–21 76.9% #6 2,087 4 46 1983 42–21 66.7% #12 1,923 0 6
27 1980 67–17 79.8% #4 2,050 4 50 1984 20–17 54.1% #57 1,828 0 6
28 1981 64–16 80.0% #6 2,035 4 53 1985 7–13 35.0% #180 1,668 0 6
29 1982 70–16 81.4% #4 2,014 4 60 1986 13–13 50.0% #85 1,656 0 7
30 1983 51–17 75.0% #11 1,947 4 63 1987 16–17 48.5% #99 1,562 0 7
31 1984 17–14 54.8% #28 1,791 4 63 1988 6–12 33.3% #224 1,534 0 7
32 1985 17–14 54.8% #39 1,767 4 63 1989 4–5 44.4% #320 1,598 0 7
33 1986 18–12 60.0% #22 1,760 4 63 — — — — — — —
34 1987 16–13 55.2% #71 1,717 4 63 — — — — — — —
35 1988 11–15 42.3% #126 1,630 4 63 — — — — — — —
36 1989 2–4 33.3% #408 1,601 4 63 — — — — — — —
39 1992 0–2 0.0% #463 1,577 4 63 — — — — — — —