H2H data updated: 2026-10-19 00:00 UTC

Guillermo Vilas vs Dick Stockton H2H: 5-1

Guillermo Vilas holds a 5–1 lead over Dick Stockton in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Guillermo Vilas leads 3–1 on clay and 2–0 on carpet. Most recently, Guillermo Vilas won the 1982 Baltimore Wct round of 16 6-2 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Guillermo Vilas
ARG Age 74 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
5 – 1
6 main-draw meetings
Dick Stockton
USA Age 75 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Guillermo Vilas #4 6-2 6-4 Dick Stockton Match data Nov 5, 1982* R16 Baltimore Wct ATP 250 Carpet
Guillermo Vilas #5 6-4 6-1 Dick Stockton Match data Apr 9, 1981* R32 Houston ATP 250 Clay
Guillermo Vilas #2 6-3 6-3 6-2 Dick Stockton #16 Match data Jun 11, 1978* SF Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Dick Stockton 6-4 6-2 Guillermo Vilas Match data Aug 7, 1976* QF Louisville ATP 250 Clay
Guillermo Vilas 7-5 6-4 6-1 Dick Stockton Match data May 9, 1976* SF Dallas Wct ATP 250 Carpet
Guillermo Vilas 6-1 6-4 Dick Stockton Match data Sep 2, 1975* R32 US Open Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Guillermo Vilas #1,186 #2 47 2,354 890 283 75.9% 4 0 1 3 54 62
Dick Stockton #808 #8 0 2,128 385 266 59.1% 0 0 0 0 8 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Guillermo Vilas Dick Stockton
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1968 1–1 50.0% — 1,506 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1969 3–3 50.0% — 1,548 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1970 2–4 33.3% — 1,532 0 0 1968 2–4 33.3% — 1,475 0 0
18 1971 1–1 50.0% — 1,538 0 0 1969 4–9 30.8% — 1,457 0 0
19 1972 18–15 54.5% — 1,691 0 0 1970 7–8 46.7% — 1,550 0 0
20 1973 24–14 63.2% #31 1,855 0 1 1971 13–9 59.1% — 1,684 0 0
21 1974 87–21 80.6% #5 2,175 0 8 1972 26–20 56.5% — 1,785 0 0
22 1975 87–18 82.9% #2 2,134 0 13 1973 38–24 61.3% #27 1,812 0 0
23 1976 82–20 80.4% #6 2,104 0 19 1974 42–20 67.7% #15 1,909 0 2
24 1977 128–15 89.5% #3 2,340 2 35 1975 39–21 65.0% #30 1,842 0 3
25 1978 61–8 88.4% #3 2,234 3 42 1976 58–26 69.0% #15 1,998 0 4
26 1979 70–22 76.1% #6 2,092 4 46 1977 56–23 70.9% #10 1,985 0 7
27 1980 62–18 77.5% #4 2,038 4 49 1978 46–27 63.0% #19 1,925 0 8
28 1981 62–16 79.5% #6 2,035 4 52 1979 20–21 48.8% #55 1,760 0 8
29 1982 70–16 81.4% #4 2,016 4 59 1980 11–16 40.7% #138 1,702 0 8
30 1983 51–17 75.0% #11 1,949 4 62 1981 14–15 48.3% #98 1,746 0 8
31 1984 17–14 54.8% #28 1,792 4 62 1982 8–18 30.8% #85 1,647 0 8
32 1985 17–14 54.8% #39 1,768 4 62 1983 1–2 33.3% #184 1,633 0 8
33 1986 18–12 60.0% #22 1,760 4 62 1984 0–3 0.0% #609 1,597 0 8
34 1987 16–13 55.2% #71 1,718 4 62 — — — — — — —
35 1988 11–15 42.3% #126 1,630 4 62 — — — — — — —
36 1989 2–4 33.3% #408 1,601 4 62 — — — — — — —
39 1992 0–2 0.0% #463 1,577 4 62 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Guillermo Vilas Dick Stockton
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1968 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1969 — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1970 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1968 — — — — — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
18 1971 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1969 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1972 1 2 3 33.3% 16 9 25 64.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 1970 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
20 1973 1 1 2 50.0% 23 12 35 65.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1971 8 5 13 61.5% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
21 1974 7 3 10 70.0% 63 10 73 86.3% 12 3 15 80.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1972 9 6 15 60.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 5 7 12 41.7%
22 1975 4 3 7 57.1% 71 11 82 86.6% 7 2 9 77.8% 5 2 7 71.4% 1973 7 6 13 53.8% 10 6 16 62.5% 4 4 8 50.0% 17 8 25 68.0%
23 1976 9 3 12 75.0% 47 9 56 83.9% 7 2 9 77.8% 19 6 25 76.0% 1974 13 10 23 56.5% 16 3 19 84.2% 8 3 11 72.7% 5 4 9 55.6%
24 1977 16 2 18 88.9% 90 5 95 94.7% 8 4 12 66.7% 14 4 18 77.8% 1975 13 5 18 72.2% 8 6 14 57.1% — — — — 18 10 28 64.3%
25 1978 11 2 13 84.6% 39 4 43 90.7% 11 2 13 84.6% — — — — 1976 8 6 14 57.1% 27 9 36 75.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 15 8 23 65.2%
26 1979 14 5 19 73.7% 30 7 37 81.1% 16 2 18 88.9% 10 8 18 55.6% 1977 5 5 10 50.0% 13 5 18 72.2% 13 5 18 72.2% 25 8 33 75.8%
27 1980 13 5 18 72.2% 38 6 44 86.4% 6 2 8 75.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1978 8 6 14 57.1% 12 6 18 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 26 13 39 66.7%
28 1981 4 2 6 66.7% 55 9 64 85.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1979 6 5 11 54.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 3 3 6 50.0% 8 9 17 47.1%
29 1982 10 3 13 76.9% 42 5 47 89.4% — — — — 18 8 26 69.2% 1980 1 6 7 14.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 7 3 10 70.0% 2 5 7 28.6%
30 1983 8 3 11 72.7% 35 10 45 77.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 1981 6 7 13 46.2% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
31 1984 5 4 9 55.6% 12 9 21 57.1% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1982 0 6 6 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 5 8 37.5%
32 1985 1 3 4 25.0% 16 11 27 59.3% — — — — — — — — 1983 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1986 0 1 1 0.0% 18 10 28 64.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1984 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
34 1987 0 2 2 0.0% 16 11 27 59.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1988 0 2 2 0.0% 11 13 24 45.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1989 — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 1992 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 105 47 152 69.1% 630 164 794 79.3% 70 27 97 72.2% 85 45 130 65.4% — 89 82 171 52.0% 112 59 171 65.5% 56 42 98 57.1% 128 83 211 60.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Guillermo Vilas Dick Stockton
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1968 1506 101.4 — — — — — — — 44.4% -0.67 1–0 — — 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1969 1548 110.0 — — — — — +33 — 52.4% 0.00 2–2 (50%) — — +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1970 1533 100.5 — — — — — +35 — 35.3% -1.24 1–1 — — +0.29 1968 1476 95.8 — — — — — — +22 36.8% -0.63 — — — +0.27
18 1971 1538 108.8 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.40 0–1 0–1 — +0.32 1969 1457 106.9 — — — — +64 +76 +9 32.3% -0.81 2–2 (50%) — — 0.00
19 1972 1692 117.1 — — — — -135 +66 -207 50.6% -0.02 5–2 (71%) 4–2 (67%) 105.1 +2.73 1970 1550 119.1 — — — — +32 +27 -92 47.2% +0.03 2–2 (50%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.09
20 1973 1855 142.4 — — — — — +68 — 60.5% +0.49 3–5 (38%) 8–5 (62%) 98.3 -1.96 1971 1685 122.8 — — — — +11 -78 — 55.0% +0.53 6–3 (67%) 10–8 (56%) 106.4 +0.96
21 1974 2176 163.0 — — — — -398 +83 -339 74.5% +1.75 14–7 (67%) 6–7 (46%) 105.9 -3.66 1972 1785 124.7 — — — — +6 -146 -131 53.0% +0.32 11–5 (69%) 9–13 (41%) 102.0 +2.19
22 1975 2135 164.8 — — — — -238 +123 -236 77.3% +1.83 11–4 (73%) 9–3 (75%) 107.0 -2.27 1973 1813 139.8 — — — — -28 -41 -156 58.9% +0.53 9–11 (45%) 17–10 (63%) 103.5 +0.72
23 1976 2105 166.1 — — — — -55 +142 -116 74.3% +1.65 16–8 (67%) 15–17 (47%) 100.8 -2.39 1974 1909 143.4 — — — — -125 +17 -99 62.9% +0.95 14–11 (56%) 11–13 (46%) 100.8 -0.92
24 1977 2341 167.8 — — — — -130 +72 -360 81.4% +2.13 26–4 (87%) 24–9 (73%) 109.7 -0.99 1975 1842 148.8 — — — — +38 +40 — 60.7% +0.74 14–9 (61%) 13–9 (59%) 104.1 -1.04
25 1978 2234 162.9 — — — — -66 +128 -119 78.4% +1.95 12–4 (75%) 8–5 (62%) 97.9 -0.26 1976 1999 161.0 — — — — -36 -1 -73 67.0% +1.09 12–12 (50%) 18–7 (72%) 104.3 -5.32
26 1979 2092 163.4 — — — — -77 +212 +65 70.9% +1.36 12–5 (71%) 18–12 (60%) 102.1 -2.83 1977 1986 161.9 — — — — +77 +11 -45 64.7% +0.89 16–12 (57%) 16–12 (57%) 99.3 -4.39
27 1980 2039 168.7 — — — — -58 +180 +106 72.7% +1.73 9–9 (50%) 10–8 (56%) 95.3 -3.22 1978 1926 157.1 — — — — +53 +59 — 62.1% +0.84 12–15 (44%) 14–8 (64%) 91.1 -1.12
28 1981 2035 170.3 — — — — -91 +159 +3 73.8% +1.88 7–3 (70%) 7–7 (50%) 96.8 -1.85 1979 1761 144.2 — — — — +102 +144 +80 48.5% -0.12 6–5 (55%) 11–7 (61%) 101.4 -1.76
29 1982 2016 167.5 — — — — -29 +190 — 75.6% +1.84 9–4 (69%) 10–7 (59%) 101.7 -2.32 1980 1702 136.8 — — — — +7 +154 +200 42.6% -0.24 4–6 (40%) 5–12 (29%) 94.9 -1.63
30 1983 1949 163.8 — — — — +35 +145 — 72.0% +1.60 7–4 (64%) 11–7 (61%) 97.6 -1.46 1981 1746 143.6 — — — — 0 +94 +97 50.7% +0.21 2–6 (25%) 6–6 (50%) 93.8 -1.08
31 1984 1792 143.4 — — — — +81 +158 — 51.9% +0.31 7–3 (70%) 7–6 (54%) 97.7 -1.09 1982 1647 136.4 — — — — +16 +132 +143 33.9% -1.06 3–6 (33%) 3–7 (30%) 93.1 -2.04
32 1985 1768 139.4 — — — — +33 +112 — 54.1% +0.04 3–3 (50%) 7–2 (78%) 101.2 -1.45 1983 1634 106.4 — — — — -4 — — 28.6% -0.29 — 0–3 (0%) — -0.22
33 1986 1761 144.2 — — — — — +100 — 56.1% +0.62 7–4 (64%) 3–7 (30%) 95.9 -1.52 1984 1597 101.7 — — — — — — — 25.0% -2.00 0–1 — — -0.44
34 1987 1718 134.7 — — — — — +82 — 55.1% +0.29 4–5 (44%) 4–5 (44%) 95.5 -1.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1988 1631 131.2 — — — — — +67 — 45.3% -0.17 3–7 (30%) 2–5 (29%) 92.2 -0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1989 1602 104.5 — — — — — +40 — 33.3% -1.53 1–1 1–0 — -0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 1992 1578 103.1 -2.21 -0.58 0.910 47.9% — — — 33.3% -1.17 0–2 0–1 — -0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2355 165.4 -2.21 -0.58 0.910 47.9% -88 +121 -141 70.6% +1.44 160–88 (65%) 154–116 (57%) 100.2 -2.18 — 2128 151.9 — — — — +14 +21 -21 57.0% +0.51 113–106 (52%) 134–117 (53%) 98.8 -2.48

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.