H2H data updated: 2026-10-21 00:00 UTC

Guillermo Vilas vs Ion Tiriac H2H: 6-0

Guillermo Vilas holds a 6–0 lead over Ion Tiriac in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Guillermo Vilas leads 4–0 on clay and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Guillermo Vilas won the 1979 Birmingham round of 32 6-1 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Guillermo Vilas
ARG Age 74 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
6 – 0
6 main-draw meetings
Ion Tiriac
ROU Age 87 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Guillermo Vilas 6-1 6-4 Ion Tiriac Match data Jan 18, 1979* R32 Birmingham ATP 250 Carpet
Guillermo Vilas #3 6-4 4-6 6-4 Ion Tiriac #87 Match data May 18, 1978* R32 Hamburg Open ATP 250 Clay
Guillermo Vilas #3 6-4 6-4 Ion Tiriac Match data Oct 7, 1977* R16 Tehran ATP 250 Clay
Guillermo Vilas #4 6-0 6-1 Ion Tiriac Match data Jul 30, 1977* QF Louisville ATP 250 Clay
Guillermo Vilas #3 1-6 6-3 6-4 Ion Tiriac Match data Apr 8, 1977* R16 Monte-Carlo Masters ATP 250 Clay
Guillermo Vilas #5 2-6 6-1 6-4 Ion Tiriac Match data Feb 20, 1977* QF Ocean City ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Guillermo Vilas #1,186 #2 47 2,354 890 283 75.9% 4 0 1 3 54 62
Ion Tiriac #439 #55 0 1,885 226 188 54.6% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Guillermo Vilas Ion Tiriac
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1968 1–1 50.0% — 1,506 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1969 3–3 50.0% — 1,548 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1970 2–4 33.3% — 1,532 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1971 1–1 50.0% — 1,538 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1972 18–15 54.5% — 1,691 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1973 24–14 63.2% #31 1,855 0 1 — — — — — — —
21 1974 87–21 80.6% #5 2,175 0 8 — — — — — — —
22 1975 87–18 82.9% #2 2,134 0 13 — — — — — — —
23 1976 82–20 80.4% #6 2,104 0 19 — — — — — — —
24 1977 128–15 89.5% #3 2,340 2 35 — — — — — — —
25 1978 61–8 88.4% #3 2,234 3 42 — — — — — — —
26 1979 70–22 76.1% #6 2,092 4 46 — — — — — — —
27 1980 62–18 77.5% #4 2,038 4 49 — — — — — — —
28 1981 62–16 79.5% #6 2,035 4 52 — — — — — — —
29 1982 70–16 81.4% #4 2,016 4 59 1968 60–12 83.3% — 1,832 0 2
30 1983 51–17 75.0% #11 1,949 4 62 1969 14–14 50.0% — 1,762 0 2
31 1984 17–14 54.8% #28 1,792 4 62 1970 32–21 60.4% — 1,808 0 3
32 1985 17–14 54.8% #39 1,768 4 62 1971 27–16 62.8% — 1,782 0 4
33 1986 18–12 60.0% #22 1,760 4 62 1972 23–26 46.9% — 1,675 0 4
34 1987 16–13 55.2% #71 1,718 4 62 1973 34–35 49.3% #74 1,677 0 4
35 1988 11–15 42.3% #126 1,630 4 62 1974 9–14 39.1% #72 1,619 0 4
36 1989 2–4 33.3% #408 1,601 4 62 1975 8–10 44.4% #138 1,594 0 4
37 — — — — — — — 1976 1–7 12.5% #248 1,548 0 4
38 — — — — — — — 1977 15–20 42.9% #97 1,631 0 4
39 1992 0–2 0.0% #463 1,577 4 62 1978 2–10 16.7% #263 1,522 0 4
40 — — — — — — — 1979 1–3 25.0% #439 1,524 0 4

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Guillermo Vilas Ion Tiriac
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1968 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1969 — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1970 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1971 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1972 1 2 3 33.3% 16 9 25 64.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1973 1 1 2 50.0% 23 12 35 65.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1974 7 3 10 70.0% 63 10 73 86.3% 12 3 15 80.0% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1975 4 3 7 57.1% 71 11 82 86.6% 7 2 9 77.8% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1976 9 3 12 75.0% 47 9 56 83.9% 7 2 9 77.8% 19 6 25 76.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1977 16 2 18 88.9% 90 5 95 94.7% 8 4 12 66.7% 14 4 18 77.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1978 11 2 13 84.6% 39 4 43 90.7% 11 2 13 84.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1979 14 5 19 73.7% 30 7 37 81.1% 16 2 18 88.9% 10 8 18 55.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1980 13 5 18 72.2% 38 6 44 86.4% 6 2 8 75.0% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1981 4 2 6 66.7% 55 9 64 85.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1982 10 3 13 76.9% 42 5 47 89.4% — — — — 18 8 26 69.2% 1968 — — — — 56 11 67 83.6% 4 1 5 80.0% — — — —
30 1983 8 3 11 72.7% 35 10 45 77.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 1969 4 5 9 44.4% 7 5 12 58.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
31 1984 5 4 9 55.6% 12 9 21 57.1% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1970 6 5 11 54.5% 23 9 32 71.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7%
32 1985 1 3 4 25.0% 16 11 27 59.3% — — — — — — — — 1971 4 4 8 50.0% 20 7 27 74.1% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
33 1986 0 1 1 0.0% 18 10 28 64.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1972 6 9 15 40.0% 10 10 20 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 4 7 42.9%
34 1987 0 2 2 0.0% 16 11 27 59.3% — — — — — — — — 1973 2 9 11 18.2% 21 19 40 52.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 7 4 11 63.6%
35 1988 0 2 2 0.0% 11 13 24 45.8% — — — — — — — — 1974 2 3 5 40.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 5 12 58.3%
36 1989 — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1975 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 6 12 50.0%
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 1 2 3 33.3% 13 14 27 48.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
39 1992 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1978 1 2 3 33.3% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
Career — 105 47 152 69.1% 630 164 794 79.3% 70 27 97 72.2% 85 45 130 65.4% — 28 42 70 40.0% 152 88 240 63.3% 21 21 42 50.0% 25 37 62 40.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Guillermo Vilas Ion Tiriac
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1968 1506 101.4 — — — — — — — 44.4% -0.67 1–0 — — 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1969 1548 110.0 — — — — — +33 — 52.4% 0.00 2–2 (50%) — — +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1970 1533 100.5 — — — — — +35 — 35.3% -1.24 1–1 — — +0.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1971 1538 108.8 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.40 0–1 0–1 — +0.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1972 1692 117.1 — — — — -135 +66 -207 50.6% -0.02 5–2 (71%) 4–2 (67%) 105.1 +2.73 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1973 1855 142.4 — — — — — +68 — 60.5% +0.49 3–5 (38%) 8–5 (62%) 98.3 -1.96 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1974 2176 163.0 — — — — -398 +83 -339 74.5% +1.75 14–7 (67%) 6–7 (46%) 105.9 -3.66 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1975 2135 164.8 — — — — -238 +123 -236 77.3% +1.83 11–4 (73%) 9–3 (75%) 107.0 -2.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1976 2105 166.1 — — — — -55 +142 -116 74.3% +1.65 16–8 (67%) 15–17 (47%) 100.8 -2.39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1977 2341 167.8 — — — — -130 +72 -360 81.4% +2.13 26–4 (87%) 24–9 (73%) 109.7 -0.99 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1978 2234 162.9 — — — — -66 +128 -119 78.4% +1.95 12–4 (75%) 8–5 (62%) 97.9 -0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1979 2092 163.4 — — — — -77 +212 +65 70.9% +1.36 12–5 (71%) 18–12 (60%) 102.1 -2.83 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1980 2039 168.7 — — — — -58 +180 +106 72.7% +1.73 9–9 (50%) 10–8 (56%) 95.3 -3.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1981 2035 170.3 — — — — -91 +159 +3 73.8% +1.88 7–3 (70%) 7–7 (50%) 96.8 -1.85 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1982 2016 167.5 — — — — -29 +190 — 75.6% +1.84 9–4 (69%) 10–7 (59%) 101.7 -2.32 1968 1833 137.7 — — — — — +131 -203 75.3% +1.86 9–2 (82%) — — +2.00
30 1983 1949 163.8 — — — — +35 +145 — 72.0% +1.60 7–4 (64%) 11–7 (61%) 97.6 -1.46 1969 1763 123.3 — — — — -148 +136 -139 51.5% +0.17 1–0 — — -1.84
31 1984 1792 143.4 — — — — +81 +158 — 51.9% +0.31 7–3 (70%) 7–6 (54%) 97.7 -1.09 1970 1808 137.8 — — — — -160 +97 -150 63.5% +0.93 3–9 (25%) — — -0.64
32 1985 1768 139.4 — — — — +33 +112 — 54.1% +0.04 3–3 (50%) 7–2 (78%) 101.2 -1.45 1971 1783 135.6 — — — — -170 +111 -58 58.1% +0.67 5–1 (83%) 2–4 (33%) 103.9 +3.38
33 1986 1761 144.2 — — — — — +100 — 56.1% +0.62 7–4 (64%) 3–7 (30%) 95.9 -1.52 1972 1676 128.9 — — — — -62 +102 +64 51.5% +0.05 6–15 (29%) 3–4 (43%) 92.8 +3.05
34 1987 1718 134.7 — — — — — +82 — 55.1% +0.29 4–5 (44%) 4–5 (44%) 95.5 -1.10 1973 1678 129.0 — — — — -55 0 +87 50.6% +0.14 10–13 (43%) 7–6 (54%) 98.5 +4.22
35 1988 1631 131.2 — — — — — +67 — 45.3% -0.17 3–7 (30%) 2–5 (29%) 92.2 -0.03 1974 1619 121.8 — — — — +72 -35 — 38.5% -0.69 3–2 (60%) 1–3 (25%) 100.2 +0.03
36 1989 1602 104.5 — — — — — +40 — 33.3% -1.53 1–1 1–0 — -0.27 1975 1595 116.1 — — — — +71 -22 — 43.5% -0.11 4–4 (50%) 1–8 (11%) 94.0 +2.98
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 1548 112.0 — — — — +53 — — 20.0% -2.20 0–1 0–1 — +0.52
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 1631 138.9 — — — — -92 +39 — 44.9% -0.49 2–6 (25%) 6–4 (60%) 98.6 -0.45
39 1992 1578 103.1 -2.21 -0.58 0.910 47.9% — — — 33.3% -1.17 0–2 0–1 — -0.15 1978 1523 117.6 — — — — +24 +98 +113 23.3% -1.60 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — +0.15
40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 1525 117.9 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.10 0–2 1–0 — -0.12
Career — 2355 165.4 -2.21 -0.58 0.910 47.9% -88 +121 -141 70.6% +1.44 160–88 (65%) 154–116 (57%) 100.2 -2.18 — 1886 136.9 — — — — -53 +83 -30 55.3% +0.42 44–57 (44%) 21–31 (40%) 92.8 +3.27

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.