H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Guillermo Vilas vs Mark Dickson H2H: 2-1

Guillermo Vilas holds a 2–1 lead over Mark Dickson in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Guillermo Vilas leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Guillermo Vilas won the 1983 Forest Hills Wct fourth round 7-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Guillermo Vilas
ARG Age 73 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Mark Dickson
USA Age 66 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 5, 1983* Forest Hills Wct ATP 250 R16 Clay Guillermo Vilas #4 7-6 6-3 Mark Dickson #41 Match data
Apr 7, 1983* Houston-Wct ATP 250 R32 Clay Mark Dickson #40 7-6 7-6 Guillermo Vilas #4 Match data
Dec 4, 1982* Chicago-2 Wct ATP 250 R16 Carpet Guillermo Vilas #4 2-6 6-4 6-4 Mark Dickson #37 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Guillermo Vilas #1,186 #2 47 2,338 898 282 76.1% 4 3 1 0 55 63
Mark Dickson #1,095 #32 0 1,817 128 118 52.0% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Guillermo Vilas Mark Dickson
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1968 1–1 50.0% — 1,507 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1969 3–3 50.0% — 1,549 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1970 2–4 33.3% — 1,533 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1971 1–1 50.0% — 1,538 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1972 18–15 54.5% — 1,693 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1973 24–14 63.2% #31 1,851 0 1 — — — — — — —
21 1974 88–22 80.0% #5 2,171 0 8 1981 1–3 25.0% — 1,501 0 0
22 1975 87–18 82.9% #2 2,129 0 13 1982 14–13 51.9% #41 1,689 0 0
23 1976 82–20 80.4% #6 2,079 0 19 1983 28–27 50.9% #66 1,699 0 0
24 1977 128–15 89.5% #2 2,303 2 35 1984 36–22 62.1% #35 1,810 0 2
25 1978 61–8 88.4% #3 2,216 3 42 1985 23–23 50.0% #74 1,717 0 2
26 1979 70–21 76.9% #6 2,087 4 46 1986 8–11 42.1% #131 1,613 0 2
27 1980 67–17 79.8% #4 2,050 4 50 1987 9–10 47.4% #155 1,618 0 2
28 1981 64–16 80.0% #6 2,035 4 53 1988 9–9 50.0% #141 1,624 0 2
29 1982 70–16 81.4% #4 2,014 4 60 — — — — — — —
30 1983 51–17 75.0% #11 1,947 4 63 — — — — — — —
31 1984 17–14 54.8% #28 1,791 4 63 — — — — — — —
32 1985 17–14 54.8% #39 1,767 4 63 — — — — — — —
33 1986 18–12 60.0% #22 1,760 4 63 — — — — — — —
34 1987 16–13 55.2% #71 1,717 4 63 — — — — — — —
35 1988 11–15 42.3% #126 1,630 4 63 — — — — — — —
36 1989 2–4 33.3% #408 1,601 4 63 — — — — — — —
39 1992 0–2 0.0% #463 1,577 4 63 — — — — — — —