H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Guillermo Vilas vs Mark Edmondson H2H: 3-1

Guillermo Vilas holds a 3–1 lead over Mark Edmondson in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on grass, while Guillermo Vilas leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Guillermo Vilas won the 1984 Hamburg third round 6-3 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Guillermo Vilas
ARG Age 73 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Mark Edmondson
AUS Age 72 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 10, 1984* Hamburg ATP 250 R32 Clay Guillermo Vilas #11 6-3 6-1 Mark Edmondson #98 Match data
Mar 27, 1982* Milan ATP 250 QF Carpet Guillermo Vilas #5 6-2 6-2 Mark Edmondson #21 Match data
Jun 24, 1981* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Mark Edmondson #55 6-4 6-1 1-6 4-6 6-3 Guillermo Vilas #7 Match data
Jan 7, 1979* Hobart ATP 250 F Grass Guillermo Vilas #3 6-4 6-4 Mark Edmondson #79 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Guillermo Vilas #1,186 #2 47 2,338 898 282 76.1% 4 3 1 0 55 63
Mark Edmondson #525 #15 0 1,927 244 231 51.4% 1 0 0 0 5 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Guillermo Vilas Mark Edmondson
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1968 1–1 50.0% — 1,507 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1969 3–3 50.0% — 1,549 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1970 2–4 33.3% — 1,533 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1971 1–1 50.0% — 1,538 0 0 1972 0–1 0.0% — 1,496 0 0
19 1972 18–15 54.5% — 1,693 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1973 24–14 63.2% #31 1,851 0 1 1974 1–2 33.3% — 1,488 0 0
21 1974 88–22 80.0% #5 2,171 0 8 1975 2–4 33.3% #212 1,501 0 0
22 1975 87–18 82.9% #2 2,129 0 13 1976 42–29 59.2% #35 1,754 1 2
23 1976 82–20 80.4% #6 2,079 0 19 1977 16–24 40.0% #99 1,598 1 2
24 1977 128–15 89.5% #2 2,303 2 35 1978 15–16 48.4% #79 1,682 1 3
25 1978 61–8 88.4% #3 2,216 3 42 1979 26–26 50.0% #95 1,740 1 3
26 1979 70–21 76.9% #6 2,087 4 46 1980 18–23 43.9% #91 1,714 1 3
27 1980 67–17 79.8% #4 2,050 4 50 1981 59–26 69.4% #23 1,902 1 6
28 1981 64–16 80.0% #6 2,035 4 53 1982 27–25 51.9% #18 1,713 1 6
29 1982 70–16 81.4% #4 2,014 4 60 1983 16–17 48.5% #37 1,687 1 6
30 1983 51–17 75.0% #11 1,947 4 63 1984 9–18 33.3% #145 1,572 1 6
31 1984 17–14 54.8% #28 1,791 4 63 1985 9–10 47.4% #115 1,595 1 6
32 1985 17–14 54.8% #39 1,767 4 63 1986 3–9 25.0% #307 1,540 1 6
33 1986 18–12 60.0% #22 1,760 4 63 1987 1–1 50.0% #523 1,550 1 6
34 1987 16–13 55.2% #71 1,717 4 63 — — — — — — —
35 1988 11–15 42.3% #126 1,630 4 63 — — — — — — —
36 1989 2–4 33.3% #408 1,601 4 63 — — — — — — —
39 1992 0–2 0.0% #463 1,577 4 63 — — — — — — —