H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Guillermo Vilas vs Roscoe Tanner H2H: 3-4

Roscoe Tanner holds a 4–3 lead over Guillermo Vilas in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Guillermo Vilas leads 3–0 on clay, while Roscoe Tanner leads 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Roscoe Tanner won the 1981 US Open fourth round 6-4 6-2 7-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Guillermo Vilas
ARG Age 73 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
3 – 4
7 main draw meetings
Roscoe Tanner
USA Age 74 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 10, 1981* US Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Roscoe Tanner #9 6-4 6-2 7-6 Guillermo Vilas #6 Match data
Feb 2, 1980* Richmond Wct ATP 250 SF Carpet Roscoe Tanner #4 6-3 3-6 6-4 Guillermo Vilas #6 Match data
Aug 6, 1977* South Orange ATP 250 F Clay Guillermo Vilas #4 6-4 6-1 Roscoe Tanner #13 Match data
Jan 15, 1977* Australian Open Grand Slam F Grass Roscoe Tanner #10 6-3 6-3 6-3 Guillermo Vilas #6 Match data
Jul 4, 1975* Wimbledon Grand Slam QF Grass Roscoe Tanner #11 6-4 5-7 6-8 6-2 6-2 Guillermo Vilas #3 Match data
Aug 9, 1974* Louisville ATP 250 R16 Clay Guillermo Vilas #10 7-5 6-4 Roscoe Tanner #21 Match data
Aug 3, 1972* Cincinnati Masters 1000 R32 Clay Guillermo Vilas 6-3 3-6 7-6 Roscoe Tanner Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Guillermo Vilas #1,186 #2 47 2,338 898 282 76.1% 4 3 1 0 55 63
Roscoe Tanner #789 #4 0 2,158 595 298 66.6% 1 1 0 0 15 17

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Guillermo Vilas Roscoe Tanner
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1968 1–1 50.0% — 1,507 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1969 3–3 50.0% — 1,549 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1970 2–4 33.3% — 1,533 0 0 1969 0–2 0.0% — 1,479 0 0
18 1971 1–1 50.0% — 1,538 0 0 1970 0–9 0.0% — 1,417 0 0
19 1972 18–15 54.5% — 1,693 0 0 1971 16–10 61.5% — 1,703 0 0
20 1973 24–14 63.2% #31 1,851 0 1 1972 29–14 67.4% — 1,911 0 0
21 1974 88–22 80.0% #5 2,171 0 8 1973 45–30 60.0% #24 1,812 0 0
22 1975 87–18 82.9% #2 2,129 0 13 1974 66–28 70.2% #14 1,959 0 2
23 1976 82–20 80.4% #6 2,079 0 19 1975 65–24 73.0% #9 1,965 0 5
24 1977 128–15 89.5% #2 2,303 2 35 1976 70–28 71.4% #11 2,012 0 9
25 1978 61–8 88.4% #3 2,216 3 42 1977 52–30 63.4% #15 1,880 1 11
26 1979 70–21 76.9% #6 2,087 4 46 1978 59–24 71.1% #11 1,935 1 13
27 1980 67–17 79.8% #4 2,050 4 50 1979 61–19 76.2% #5 2,025 1 15
28 1981 64–16 80.0% #6 2,035 4 53 1980 42–16 72.4% #13 1,993 1 16
29 1982 70–16 81.4% #4 2,014 4 60 1981 51–22 69.9% #12 1,901 1 17
30 1983 51–17 75.0% #11 1,947 4 63 1982 20–17 54.1% #43 1,779 1 17
31 1984 17–14 54.8% #28 1,791 4 63 1983 16–13 55.2% #36 1,872 1 17
32 1985 17–14 54.8% #39 1,767 4 63 1984 3–11 21.4% #249 1,679 1 17
33 1986 18–12 60.0% #22 1,760 4 63 1985 0–1 0.0% #794 1,661 1 17
34 1987 16–13 55.2% #71 1,717 4 63 — — — — — — —
35 1988 11–15 42.3% #126 1,630 4 63 — — — — — — —
36 1989 2–4 33.3% #408 1,601 4 63 — — — — — — —
39 1992 0–2 0.0% #463 1,577 4 63 — — — — — — —