H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Guillermo Vilas vs Tom Okker H2H: 1-5

Tom Okker holds a 5–1 lead over Guillermo Vilas in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Tom Okker leads 2–1 on clay and 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tom Okker won the 1979 Canadian Open round of 32 6-3 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Guillermo Vilas
ARG Age 74 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 – 5
6 main draw meetings
Tom Okker
NED Age 82 Right-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tom Okker #46 6-3 7-5 Guillermo Vilas #4 Match data Aug 16, 1979* R32 Canadian Open ATP 500 Hard
Tom Okker 6-3 6-4 6-2 Guillermo Vilas #2 Match data Jul 2, 1978* R32 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Tom Okker 6-4 6-3 6-2 Guillermo Vilas Match data Aug 31, 1974* SF U.S. Pro Tennis Championships ATP 250 Clay
Guillermo Vilas #10 7-5 6-2 Tom Okker #5 Match data Aug 18, 1974* SF Canadian Open ATP 500 Clay
Tom Okker 6-1 6-1 Guillermo Vilas Match data Nov 2, 1973* R16 Paris Masters ATP 250 Hard
Tom Okker #6 6-2 6-4 Guillermo Vilas #31 Match data Oct 25, 1973* R16 Madrid ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Guillermo Vilas #1,186 #2 47 2,355 890 283 75.9% 4 0 1 3 54 62
Tom Okker #438 #3 0 2,196 668 278 70.6% 0 0 0 1 33 34

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Guillermo Vilas Tom Okker
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1968 1–1 50.0% — 1,506 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1969 3–3 50.0% — 1,548 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1970 2–4 33.3% — 1,533 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1971 1–1 50.0% — 1,538 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1972 18–15 54.5% — 1,691 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1973 24–14 63.2% #31 1,854 0 1 — — — — — — —
21 1974 87–21 80.6% #5 2,175 0 8 — — — — — — —
22 1975 87–18 82.9% #2 2,134 0 13 — — — — — — —
23 1976 82–20 80.4% #6 2,104 0 19 — — — — — — —
24 1977 128–15 89.5% #3 2,340 2 35 1968 89–23 79.5% — 1,793 0 4
25 1978 61–8 88.4% #3 2,234 3 42 1969 86–25 77.5% — 2,029 0 12
26 1979 70–22 76.1% #6 2,092 4 46 1970 59–27 68.6% — 1,947 0 17
27 1980 62–18 77.5% #4 2,038 4 49 1971 74–31 70.5% — 2,012 0 19
28 1981 62–16 79.5% #6 2,035 4 52 1972 69–31 69.0% — 2,042 0 20
29 1982 70–16 81.4% #4 2,016 4 59 1973 91–23 79.8% #4 2,171 0 27
30 1983 51–17 75.0% #11 1,949 4 62 1974 61–18 77.2% #6 2,074 0 30
31 1984 17–14 54.8% #28 1,792 4 62 1975 39–13 75.0% #11 2,076 0 32
32 1985 17–14 54.8% #39 1,768 4 62 1976 33–18 64.7% #23 1,962 0 32
33 1986 18–12 60.0% #22 1,760 4 62 1977 15–13 53.6% #29 1,935 0 33
34 1987 16–13 55.2% #71 1,718 4 62 1978 20–20 50.0% #50 1,882 0 33
35 1988 11–15 42.3% #126 1,630 4 62 1979 20–18 52.6% #56 1,774 0 34
36 1989 2–4 33.3% #408 1,601 4 62 1980 11–13 45.8% #107 1,716 0 34
37 — — — — — — — 1981 1–5 16.7% — 1,652 0 34
39 1992 0–2 0.0% #463 1,577 4 62 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Guillermo Vilas Tom Okker
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1968 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1969 — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1970 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1971 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1972 1 2 3 33.3% 16 9 25 64.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1973 1 1 2 50.0% 23 12 35 65.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1974 7 3 10 70.0% 63 10 73 86.3% 12 3 15 80.0% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1975 4 3 7 57.1% 71 11 82 86.6% 7 2 9 77.8% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1976 9 3 12 75.0% 47 9 56 83.9% 7 2 9 77.8% 19 6 25 76.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1977 16 2 18 88.9% 90 5 95 94.7% 8 4 12 66.7% 14 4 18 77.8% 1968 26 9 35 74.3% 35 7 42 83.3% 20 2 22 90.9% 8 5 13 61.5%
25 1978 11 2 13 84.6% 39 4 43 90.7% 11 2 13 84.6% — — — — 1969 19 9 28 67.9% 36 6 42 85.7% 14 4 18 77.8% 17 6 23 73.9%
26 1979 14 5 19 73.7% 30 7 37 81.1% 16 2 18 88.9% 10 8 18 55.6% 1970 15 6 21 71.4% 16 3 19 84.2% 21 12 33 63.6% 7 6 13 53.8%
27 1980 13 5 18 72.2% 38 6 44 86.4% 6 2 8 75.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1971 12 7 19 63.2% 24 10 34 70.6% 13 4 17 76.5% 25 10 35 71.4%
28 1981 4 2 6 66.7% 55 9 64 85.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1972 22 10 32 68.8% 10 5 15 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 35 15 50 70.0%
29 1982 10 3 13 76.9% 42 5 47 89.4% — — — — 18 8 26 69.2% 1973 16 5 21 76.2% 39 8 47 83.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 32 8 40 80.0%
30 1983 8 3 11 72.7% 35 10 45 77.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 1974 14 5 19 73.7% 17 6 23 73.9% 6 2 8 75.0% 24 5 29 82.8%
31 1984 5 4 9 55.6% 12 9 21 57.1% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1975 13 3 16 81.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 10 1 11 90.9% 15 6 21 71.4%
32 1985 1 3 4 25.0% 16 11 27 59.3% — — — — — — — — 1976 6 3 9 66.7% 7 5 12 58.3% 5 2 7 71.4% 15 8 23 65.2%
33 1986 0 1 1 0.0% 18 10 28 64.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1977 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 8 7 15 53.3%
34 1987 0 2 2 0.0% 16 11 27 59.3% — — — — — — — — 1978 3 4 7 42.9% 9 8 17 52.9% 6 2 8 75.0% 2 6 8 25.0%
35 1988 0 2 2 0.0% 11 13 24 45.8% — — — — — — — — 1979 11 6 17 64.7% 3 5 8 37.5% 4 1 5 80.0% 2 6 8 25.0%
36 1989 — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1980 5 4 9 55.6% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 3 5 40.0%
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
39 1992 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 105 47 152 69.1% 630 164 794 79.3% 70 27 97 72.2% 85 45 130 65.4% — 167 78 245 68.2% 199 73 272 73.2% 110 36 146 75.3% 192 91 283 67.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Guillermo Vilas Tom Okker
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1968 1507 101.4 — — — — — — — 44.4% -0.67 1–0 — — 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1969 1548 110.0 — — — — — +33 — 52.4% 0.00 2–2 (50%) — — +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1970 1533 100.6 — — — — — +32 — 35.3% -1.24 1–1 — — +0.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1971 1538 109.3 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.40 0–1 0–1 — +0.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1972 1692 117.2 — — — — -135 +67 -207 50.6% -0.02 5–2 (71%) 4–2 (67%) — +2.75 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1973 1855 142.4 — — — — — +66 — 60.5% +0.49 3–5 (38%) 8–5 (62%) — -1.97 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1974 2176 163.1 — — — — -398 +81 -339 74.5% +1.75 14–7 (67%) 6–7 (46%) — -3.67 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1975 2135 164.8 — — — — -238 +124 -236 77.3% +1.83 11–4 (73%) 9–3 (75%) — -2.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1976 2105 166.1 — — — — -55 +141 -116 74.3% +1.65 16–8 (67%) 15–17 (47%) — -2.39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1977 2341 167.8 — — — — -130 +71 -360 81.4% +2.13 26–4 (87%) 24–9 (73%) — -0.99 1968 1794 133.7 — — — — +101 +28 +106 72.8% +1.68 13–8 (62%) — — +1.39
25 1978 2235 162.9 — — — — -67 +127 -120 78.4% +1.95 12–4 (75%) 8–5 (62%) — -0.26 1969 2030 149.0 — — — — +67 +67 -72 73.5% +1.60 14–8 (64%) 2–0 — -4.53
26 1979 2092 163.4 — — — — -76 +212 +65 70.9% +1.36 12–5 (71%) 18–12 (60%) — -2.83 1970 1947 145.1 — — — — -16 +206 +16 66.5% +1.16 8–11 (42%) 7–4 (64%) — +2.19
27 1980 2039 168.7 — — — — -56 +181 +106 72.7% +1.73 9–9 (50%) 10–8 (56%) — -3.22 1971 2013 159.9 — — — — +69 +10 +75 65.3% +1.09 15–11 (58%) 15–22 (41%) — -6.81
28 1981 2035 170.3 — — — — -90 +159 +3 73.8% +1.88 7–3 (70%) 7–7 (50%) — -1.85 1972 2043 156.9 — — — — +57 -30 -5 63.5% +1.01 22–10 (69%) 24–19 (56%) — -5.06
29 1982 2016 167.5 — — — — -29 +191 — 75.6% +1.84 9–4 (69%) 10–7 (59%) — -2.32 1973 2171 158.0 — — — — +40 -10 -158 70.9% +1.31 23–7 (77%) 20–10 (67%) — -4.78
30 1983 1949 163.8 — — — — +35 +145 — 72.0% +1.60 7–4 (64%) 11–7 (61%) — -1.46 1974 2074 157.5 — — — — +132 +65 -20 68.6% +0.99 20–3 (87%) 22–8 (73%) — -4.73
31 1984 1792 143.4 — — — — +81 +158 — 51.9% +0.31 7–3 (70%) 7–6 (54%) — -1.09 1975 2076 152.1 — — — — +76 -53 +48 70.1% +1.53 9–4 (69%) 5–2 (71%) — -1.17
32 1985 1768 139.4 — — — — +33 +113 — 54.1% +0.04 3–3 (50%) 7–2 (78%) — -1.45 1976 1963 149.2 — — — — +53 -21 +146 61.5% +0.73 7–4 (64%) 5–4 (56%) — -1.71
33 1986 1761 144.2 — — — — — +100 — 56.1% +0.62 7–4 (64%) 3–7 (30%) — -1.52 1977 1936 150.8 — — — — +16 — +174 52.1% +0.08 6–4 (60%) 2–1 (67%) — -2.95
34 1987 1718 134.7 — — — — — +82 — 55.1% +0.29 4–5 (44%) 4–5 (44%) — -1.10 1978 1882 150.6 — — — — -30 -29 +247 51.9% +0.15 7–7 (50%) 5–5 (50%) — -4.63
35 1988 1631 131.2 — — — — — +67 — 45.3% -0.17 3–7 (30%) 2–5 (29%) — -0.03 1979 1774 131.3 — — — — +9 -16 +387 51.0% +0.03 8–5 (62%) 8–8 (50%) — 0.00
36 1989 1602 104.5 — — — — — +40 — 33.3% -1.53 1–1 1–0 — -0.27 1980 1717 136.0 — — — — +27 -8 +440 47.5% -0.25 3–5 (38%) 5–2 (71%) — +0.78
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1653 106.8 — — — — +39 — — 26.7% -1.20 0–1 0–3 (0%) — -0.28
39 1992 1578 103.1 -2.21 -0.58 0.910 47.9% — — — 33.3% -1.17 0–2 0–1 — -0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2355 165.4 -2.21 -0.58 0.910 47.9% -88 +121 -141 70.6% +1.44 160–88 (65%) 154–116 (57%) 100.3 -2.17 — 2196 154.7 — — — — +57 +28 +63 65.9% +1.08 155–88 (64%) 120–88 (58%) 102.9 -3.45

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.