H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Guillermo Vilas vs Vladimir Zednik H2H: 5-1

Guillermo Vilas holds a 5–1 lead over Vladimir Zednik in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Guillermo Vilas leads 3–1 on clay and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Guillermo Vilas won the 1979 Birmingham fourth round 6-2 7-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Guillermo Vilas
ARG Age 73 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
5 – 1
6 main draw meetings
Vladimir Zednik
CZE Age 79 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 19, 1979* Birmingham ATP 250 R16 Carpet Guillermo Vilas #3 6-2 7-6 Vladimir Zednik #71 Match data
May 28, 1978* Munich ATP 250 QF Clay Guillermo Vilas #2 6-2 7-5 Vladimir Zednik #53 Match data
Oct 6, 1977* Tehran ATP 250 R32 Clay Guillermo Vilas #3 3-6 6-3 6-3 Vladimir Zednik #131 Match data
Jun 26, 1974* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Guillermo Vilas #23 6-2 9-8 6-4 Vladimir Zednik #65 Match data
Nov 1, 1973* Prague ATP 250 R16 Clay Vladimir Zednik #89 7-6 7-5 Guillermo Vilas #31 Match data
Jun 13, 1973* Hamburg ATP 250 R64 Clay Guillermo Vilas 6-2 6-1 Vladimir Zednik Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Guillermo Vilas #1,186 #2 47 2,338 898 282 76.1% 4 3 1 0 55 63
Vladimir Zednik #300 #35 0 1,753 113 157 41.9% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Guillermo Vilas Vladimir Zednik
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1968 1–1 50.0% — 1,507 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1969 3–3 50.0% — 1,549 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1970 2–4 33.3% — 1,533 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1971 1–1 50.0% — 1,538 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1972 18–15 54.5% — 1,693 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1973 24–14 63.2% #31 1,851 0 1 — — — — — — —
21 1974 88–22 80.0% #5 2,171 0 8 1968 1–1 50.0% — 1,500 0 0
22 1975 87–18 82.9% #2 2,129 0 13 1969 4–2 66.7% — 1,562 0 0
23 1976 82–20 80.4% #6 2,079 0 19 1970 6–7 46.2% — 1,577 0 0
24 1977 128–15 89.5% #2 2,303 2 35 1971 17–20 45.9% — 1,623 0 0
25 1978 61–8 88.4% #3 2,216 3 42 1972 19–20 48.7% — 1,647 0 1
26 1979 70–21 76.9% #6 2,087 4 46 1973 14–24 36.8% #90 1,613 0 1
27 1980 67–17 79.8% #4 2,050 4 50 1974 12–19 38.7% #93 1,629 0 1
28 1981 64–16 80.0% #6 2,035 4 53 1975 3–11 21.4% #157 1,601 0 1
29 1982 70–16 81.4% #4 2,014 4 60 1976 5–10 33.3% #106 1,585 0 1
30 1983 51–17 75.0% #11 1,947 4 63 1977 9–13 40.9% #75 1,637 0 1
31 1984 17–14 54.8% #28 1,791 4 63 1978 22–22 50.0% #70 1,658 0 2
32 1985 17–14 54.8% #39 1,767 4 63 1979 1–7 12.5% #300 1,580 0 2
33 1986 18–12 60.0% #22 1,760 4 63 1980 0–1 0.0% — 1,570 0 2
34 1987 16–13 55.2% #71 1,717 4 63 — — — — — — —
35 1988 11–15 42.3% #126 1,630 4 63 — — — — — — —
36 1989 2–4 33.3% #408 1,601 4 63 — — — — — — —
39 1992 0–2 0.0% #463 1,577 4 63 — — — — — — —