H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Guillermo Vilas vs Vladimir Zednik H2H: 5-1

Guillermo Vilas holds a 5–1 lead over Vladimir Zednik in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Guillermo Vilas leads 3–1 on clay and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Guillermo Vilas won the 1979 Birmingham round of 16 6-2 7-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Guillermo Vilas
ARG Age 74 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
5 – 1
6 main draw meetings
Vladimir Zednik
CZE Age 79 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Guillermo Vilas 6-2 7-6 Vladimir Zednik Match data Jan 19, 1979* R16 Birmingham ATP 250 Carpet
Guillermo Vilas #2 6-2 7-5 Vladimir Zednik #53 Match data May 28, 1978* QF Munich Open ATP 250 Clay
Guillermo Vilas #3 3-6 6-3 6-3 Vladimir Zednik Match data Oct 6, 1977* R32 Tehran ATP 250 Clay
Guillermo Vilas 6-2 9-8 6-4 Vladimir Zednik Match data Jun 26, 1974* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Vladimir Zednik 7-6 7-5 Guillermo Vilas Match data Nov 1, 1973* R16 Prague ATP 250 Clay
Guillermo Vilas 6-2 6-1 Vladimir Zednik Match data Jun 13, 1973* R64 Hamburg Open ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Guillermo Vilas #1,186 #2 47 2,355 890 283 75.9% 4 0 1 3 54 62
Vladimir Zednik #300 #35 0 1,757 113 158 41.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Guillermo Vilas Vladimir Zednik
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1968 1–1 50.0% — 1,506 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1969 3–3 50.0% — 1,548 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1970 2–4 33.3% — 1,533 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1971 1–1 50.0% — 1,538 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1972 18–15 54.5% — 1,691 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1973 24–14 63.2% #31 1,854 0 1 — — — — — — —
21 1974 87–21 80.6% #5 2,175 0 8 1968 1–1 50.0% — 1,500 0 0
22 1975 87–18 82.9% #2 2,134 0 13 1969 4–2 66.7% — 1,561 0 0
23 1976 82–20 80.4% #6 2,104 0 19 1970 6–7 46.2% — 1,576 0 0
24 1977 128–15 89.5% #3 2,340 2 35 1971 17–20 45.9% — 1,629 0 0
25 1978 61–8 88.4% #3 2,234 3 42 1972 19–20 48.7% — 1,653 0 1
26 1979 70–22 76.1% #6 2,092 4 46 1973 14–24 36.8% #90 1,636 0 1
27 1980 62–18 77.5% #4 2,038 4 49 1974 12–19 38.7% #93 1,635 0 1
28 1981 62–16 79.5% #6 2,035 4 52 1975 3–11 21.4% #157 1,622 0 1
29 1982 70–16 81.4% #4 2,016 4 59 1976 5–11 31.2% #106 1,593 0 1
30 1983 51–17 75.0% #11 1,949 4 62 1977 9–13 40.9% #66 1,642 0 1
31 1984 17–14 54.8% #28 1,792 4 62 1978 22–22 50.0% #70 1,660 0 2
32 1985 17–14 54.8% #39 1,768 4 62 1979 1–7 12.5% #300 1,582 0 2
33 1986 18–12 60.0% #22 1,760 4 62 1980 0–1 0.0% — 1,572 0 2
34 1987 16–13 55.2% #71 1,718 4 62 — — — — — — —
35 1988 11–15 42.3% #126 1,630 4 62 — — — — — — —
36 1989 2–4 33.3% #408 1,601 4 62 — — — — — — —
39 1992 0–2 0.0% #463 1,577 4 62 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Guillermo Vilas Vladimir Zednik
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1968 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1969 — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1970 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1971 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1972 1 2 3 33.3% 16 9 25 64.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1973 1 1 2 50.0% 23 12 35 65.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1974 7 3 10 70.0% 63 10 73 86.3% 12 3 15 80.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1968 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
22 1975 4 3 7 57.1% 71 11 82 86.6% 7 2 9 77.8% 5 2 7 71.4% 1969 3 1 4 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
23 1976 9 3 12 75.0% 47 9 56 83.9% 7 2 9 77.8% 19 6 25 76.0% 1970 — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
24 1977 16 2 18 88.9% 90 5 95 94.7% 8 4 12 66.7% 14 4 18 77.8% 1971 9 10 19 47.4% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
25 1978 11 2 13 84.6% 39 4 43 90.7% 11 2 13 84.6% — — — — 1972 4 6 10 40.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 10 6 16 62.5%
26 1979 14 5 19 73.7% 30 7 37 81.1% 16 2 18 88.9% 10 8 18 55.6% 1973 0 3 3 0.0% 8 9 17 47.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 9 12 25.0%
27 1980 13 5 18 72.2% 38 6 44 86.4% 6 2 8 75.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1974 0 2 2 0.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 3 5 8 37.5%
28 1981 4 2 6 66.7% 55 9 64 85.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1975 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 0 7 7 0.0%
29 1982 10 3 13 76.9% 42 5 47 89.4% — — — — 18 8 26 69.2% 1976 1 2 3 33.3% 3 8 11 27.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
30 1983 8 3 11 72.7% 35 10 45 77.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 1977 0 1 1 0.0% 7 8 15 46.7% — — — — 2 4 6 33.3%
31 1984 5 4 9 55.6% 12 9 21 57.1% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1978 1 3 4 25.0% 19 12 31 61.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 6 8 25.0%
32 1985 1 3 4 25.0% 16 11 27 59.3% — — — — — — — — 1979 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
33 1986 0 1 1 0.0% 18 10 28 64.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1980 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1987 0 2 2 0.0% 16 11 27 59.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1988 0 2 2 0.0% 11 13 24 45.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1989 — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 1992 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 105 47 152 69.1% 630 164 794 79.3% 70 27 97 72.2% 85 45 130 65.4% — 18 34 52 34.6% 58 63 121 47.9% 11 19 30 36.7% 26 42 68 38.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Guillermo Vilas Vladimir Zednik
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1968 1507 101.4 — — — — — — — 44.4% -0.67 1–0 — — 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1969 1548 110.0 — — — — — +33 — 52.4% 0.00 2–2 (50%) — — +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1970 1533 100.6 — — — — — +32 — 35.3% -1.24 1–1 — — +0.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1971 1538 109.3 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.40 0–1 0–1 — +0.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1972 1692 117.2 — — — — -135 +67 -207 50.6% -0.02 5–2 (71%) 4–2 (67%) — +2.75 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1973 1855 142.4 — — — — — +66 — 60.5% +0.49 3–5 (38%) 8–5 (62%) — -1.97 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1974 2176 163.1 — — — — -398 +81 -339 74.5% +1.75 14–7 (67%) 6–7 (46%) — -3.67 1968 1500 101.6 — — — — — — — 60.0% +0.60 0–1 — — +0.06
22 1975 2135 164.8 — — — — -238 +124 -236 77.3% +1.83 11–4 (73%) 9–3 (75%) — -2.26 1969 1562 110.4 — — — — +69 — — 58.8% +0.47 1–0 — — +0.42
23 1976 2105 166.1 — — — — -55 +141 -116 74.3% +1.65 16–8 (67%) 15–17 (47%) — -2.39 1970 1576 112.1 — — — — — -41 -8 44.2% -0.47 3–1 (75%) 3–0 (100%) — +0.55
24 1977 2341 167.8 — — — — -130 +71 -360 81.4% +2.13 26–4 (87%) 24–9 (73%) — -0.99 1971 1630 112.7 — — — — +20 -4 -140 46.0% -0.41 6–7 (46%) 6–4 (60%) — +2.74
25 1978 2235 162.9 — — — — -67 +127 -120 78.4% +1.95 12–4 (75%) 8–5 (62%) — -0.26 1972 1654 127.7 — — — — +75 -41 — 47.8% -0.14 5–3 (63%) 10–5 (67%) — +1.73
26 1979 2092 163.4 — — — — -76 +212 +65 70.9% +1.36 12–5 (71%) 18–12 (60%) — -2.83 1973 1637 128.2 — — — — +13 +39 -160 42.9% -0.51 2–5 (29%) 3–8 (27%) — -0.89
27 1980 2039 168.7 — — — — -56 +181 +106 72.7% +1.73 9–9 (50%) 10–8 (56%) — -3.22 1974 1636 122.3 — — — — -16 -23 -87 43.5% -0.32 3–7 (30%) 8–5 (62%) — -0.80
28 1981 2035 170.3 — — — — -90 +159 +3 73.8% +1.88 7–3 (70%) 7–7 (50%) — -1.85 1975 1623 129.9 — — — — -78 +27 — 29.0% -0.93 3–1 (75%) 1–6 (14%) — -1.26
29 1982 2016 167.5 — — — — -29 +191 — 75.6% +1.84 9–4 (69%) 10–7 (59%) — -2.32 1976 1593 122.5 — — — — -42 -10 — 38.1% -0.67 3–6 (33%) 4–3 (57%) — -0.27
30 1983 1949 163.8 — — — — +35 +145 — 72.0% +1.60 7–4 (64%) 11–7 (61%) — -1.46 1977 1643 134.4 — — — — -94 -5 — 50.8% +0.08 1–10 (9%) 4–5 (44%) — +0.22
31 1984 1792 143.4 — — — — +81 +158 — 51.9% +0.31 7–3 (70%) 7–6 (54%) — -1.09 1978 1661 140.4 — — — — -123 +79 — 50.0% +0.10 6–8 (43%) 6–10 (38%) — +1.28
32 1985 1768 139.4 — — — — +33 +113 — 54.1% +0.04 3–3 (50%) 7–2 (78%) — -1.45 1979 1583 117.3 — — — — -87 — — 11.8% -2.00 1–0 0–3 (0%) — +0.12
33 1986 1761 144.2 — — — — — +100 — 56.1% +0.62 7–4 (64%) 3–7 (30%) — -1.52 1980 1573 101.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% 0.00 0–1 0–2 — -0.06
34 1987 1718 134.7 — — — — — +82 — 55.1% +0.29 4–5 (44%) 4–5 (44%) — -1.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1988 1631 131.2 — — — — — +67 — 45.3% -0.17 3–7 (30%) 2–5 (29%) — -0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1989 1602 104.5 — — — — — +40 — 33.3% -1.53 1–1 1–0 — -0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 1992 1578 103.1 -2.21 -0.58 0.910 47.9% — — — 33.3% -1.17 0–2 0–1 — -0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2355 165.4 -2.21 -0.58 0.910 47.9% -88 +121 -141 70.6% +1.44 160–88 (65%) 154–116 (57%) 100.3 -2.17 — 1757 133.1 — — — — -7 +19 -94 44.8% -0.30 34–50 (40%) 45–51 (47%) 99.4 +1.45

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.