H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC

Gustavo Kuerten vs Albert Costa H2H: 6-2

Gustavo Kuerten holds a 6–2 lead over Albert Costa in their ATP head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on clay, while Gustavo Kuerten leads 2–0 on carpet. Most recently, Albert Costa won the 2002 Roland Garros fourth round 6-4 7-5 6-4.

BRA Age 49 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
6 2
8 main draw meetings
ESP Age 51 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 5, 2002* Roland Garros Grand Slam R16 Clay Albert Costa #22 6-4 7-5 6-4 Gustavo Kuerten #7 Match data
Sep 5, 2001* US Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Gustavo Kuerten #1 6-4 6-4 7-6(7) Albert Costa #40 Match data
Nov 19, 2000* Paris Masters Masters 1000 QF Carpet Gustavo Kuerten #3 6-4 7-6 Albert Costa #32 Match data
May 14, 2000* Rome Masters Masters 1000 QF Clay Gustavo Kuerten #6 6-4 7-5 Albert Costa #21 Match data
Oct 28, 1999* Stuttgart Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Gustavo Kuerten #5 3-6 7-5 6-3 Albert Costa #24 Match data
Jul 25, 1998* Stuttgart Outdoor ATP 250 QF Clay Gustavo Kuerten #26 7-5 6-0 Albert Costa #13 Match data
Oct 9, 1997* Vienna ATP 250 R32 Carpet Gustavo Kuerten #11 7-5 3-6 7-6(2) Albert Costa #20 Match data
Aug 9, 1996* San Marino ATP 250 R16 Clay Albert Costa #18 6-3 6-3 Gustavo Kuerten #116 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Gustavo Kuerten #1,132 #1 4,750 2,140 336 182 64.9% 3 5 1 0 11 20
Albert Costa #669 #6 2,385 1,996 368 263 58.3% 1 1 0 0 10 12

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Gustavo Kuerten Albert Costa
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1993 2–2 50.0% #221 1,522 0 0
19 1996 8–10 44.4% #88 1,556 0 0 1994 15–18 45.5% #52 1,583 0 0
20 1997 34–23 59.6% #14 1,779 1 1 1995 33–22 60.0% #24 1,758 0 1
21 1998 39–24 61.9% #23 1,781 1 3 1996 46–26 63.9% #13 1,750 0 4
22 1999 47–24 66.2% #5 1,860 1 5 1997 40–20 66.7% #19 1,830 0 6
23 2000 59–18 76.6% #1 2,012 2 10 1998 47–26 64.4% #14 1,759 0 8
24 2001 57–17 77.0% #2 1,915 3 16 1999 40–22 64.5% #18 1,810 0 11
25 2002 24–14 63.2% #37 1,874 3 17 2000 29–22 56.9% #26 1,779 0 11
26 2003 40–19 67.8% #16 1,854 3 19 2001 27–22 55.1% #40 1,807 0 11
27 2004 23–12 65.7% #40 1,834 3 20 2002 32–22 59.3% #9 1,796 1 12
28 2005 3–9 25.0% #291 1,714 3 20 2003 23–20 53.5% #25 1,767 1 12
29 2006 0–1 0.0% #1078 1,689 3 20 2004 19–22 46.3% #56 1,668 1 12
30 2007 2–7 22.2% #680 1,601 3 20 2005 13–17 43.3% #116 1,619 1 12
31 2008 0–4 0.0% #1150 1,560 3 20 2006 2–2 50.0% #623 1,631 1 12