H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Gustavo Kuerten vs Andrei Chesnokov H2H: 1-0
Gustavo Kuerten holds a 1–0 lead over Andrei Chesnokov in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Gustavo Kuerten leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Gustavo Kuerten won the 1996 Prague third round 3-6 7-5 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BRA
Age 49
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 60
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 2, 1996* | Prague | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Gustavo Kuerten | 3-6 7-5 7-5 | Andrei Chesnokov | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gustavo Kuerten | #1,132 | #1 | 4,750 | 2,140 | 336 | 182 | 64.9% | 3 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 11 | 20 |
| Andrei Chesnokov | #709 | #9 | 1,399 | 1,972 | 316 | 235 | 57.4% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Gustavo Kuerten | Andrei Chesnokov | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1996 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #88 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #137 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1997 | 34–23 | 59.6% | #14 | 1,779 | 1 | 1 | 1986 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #36 | 1,733 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1998 | 39–24 | 61.9% | #23 | 1,781 | 1 | 3 | 1987 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #52 | 1,802 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1999 | 47–24 | 66.2% | #5 | 1,860 | 1 | 5 | 1988 | 44–16 | 73.3% | #14 | 1,884 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2000 | 59–18 | 76.6% | #1 | 2,012 | 2 | 10 | 1989 | 30–16 | 65.2% | #22 | 1,863 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 2001 | 57–17 | 77.0% | #2 | 1,915 | 3 | 16 | 1990 | 43–20 | 68.3% | #12 | 1,861 | 0 | 6 |
| 25 | 2002 | 24–14 | 63.2% | #37 | 1,874 | 3 | 17 | 1991 | 28–21 | 57.1% | #31 | 1,781 | 0 | 7 |
| 26 | 2003 | 40–19 | 67.8% | #16 | 1,854 | 3 | 19 | 1992 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #30 | 1,726 | 0 | 7 |
| 27 | 2004 | 23–12 | 65.7% | #40 | 1,834 | 3 | 20 | 1993 | 37–28 | 56.9% | #27 | 1,749 | 0 | 7 |
| 28 | 2005 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #291 | 1,714 | 3 | 20 | 1994 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #32 | 1,773 | 0 | 7 |
| 29 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1078 | 1,689 | 3 | 20 | 1995 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #89 | 1,628 | 0 | 7 |
| 30 | 2007 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #680 | 1,601 | 3 | 20 | 1996 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #85 | 1,585 | 0 | 7 |
| 31 | 2008 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #1150 | 1,560 | 3 | 20 | 1997 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #209 | 1,571 | 0 | 7 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #494 | 1,565 | 0 | 7 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #872 | 1,551 | 0 | 7 |