H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 07:16 UTC
Gustavo Kuerten vs Andrew Ilie H2H: 1-1
Gustavo Kuerten and Andrew Ilie are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Gustavo Kuerten leads 1–0 on clay, while Andrew Ilie leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Gustavo Kuerten won the 2001 Stuttgart third round 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BRA
Age 49
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 50
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 19, 2001* | Stuttgart | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Gustavo Kuerten | 6-1 6-2 | Andrew Ilie | Match data |
| Feb 13, 1999* | Dubai | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Andrew Ilie | 6-4 6-4 | Gustavo Kuerten | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gustavo Kuerten | #1,132 | #1 | 4,750 | 2,140 | 336 | 182 | 64.9% | 3 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 11 | 20 |
| Andrew Ilie | #856 | #38 | 997 | 1,739 | 89 | 114 | 43.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Gustavo Kuerten | Andrew Ilie | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1996 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #88 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #161 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1997 | 34–23 | 59.6% | #14 | 1,779 | 1 | 1 | 1996 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #346 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1998 | 39–24 | 61.9% | #23 | 1,781 | 1 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1999 | 47–24 | 66.2% | #5 | 1,860 | 1 | 5 | 1998 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,586 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2000 | 59–18 | 76.6% | #1 | 2,012 | 2 | 10 | 1999 | 28–29 | 49.1% | #54 | 1,632 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2001 | 57–17 | 77.0% | #2 | 1,915 | 3 | 16 | 2000 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #50 | 1,602 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2002 | 24–14 | 63.2% | #37 | 1,874 | 3 | 17 | 2001 | 20–28 | 41.7% | #66 | 1,622 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2003 | 40–19 | 67.8% | #16 | 1,854 | 3 | 19 | 2002 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #464 | 1,502 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2004 | 23–12 | 65.7% | #40 | 1,834 | 3 | 20 | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #384 | 1,457 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2005 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #291 | 1,714 | 3 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1078 | 1,689 | 3 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2007 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #680 | 1,601 | 3 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2008 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #1150 | 1,560 | 3 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |