H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Gustavo Kuerten vs Cecil Mamiit H2H: 1-0

Gustavo Kuerten holds a 1–0 lead over Cecil Mamiit in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Gustavo Kuerten leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Gustavo Kuerten won the 2001 Indian Wells Open round of 64 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Gustavo Kuerten
BRA Age 49 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Cecil Mamiit
PHI Age 50 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Gustavo Kuerten #1 6-2 6-3 Cecil Mamiit #125 Match data Mar 14, 2001* R64 Indian Wells Open Masters 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Gustavo Kuerten #1,132 #1 4,750 2,137 339 184 64.8% 3 5 1 4 7 20
Cecil Mamiit #1,573 #72 625 1,631 48 95 33.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Gustavo Kuerten Cecil Mamiit
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1996 8–10 44.4% #88 1,556 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1997 34–23 59.6% #14 1,780 1 1 1996 0–4 0.0% #200 1,471 0 0
21 1998 39–24 61.9% #23 1,781 1 3 1997 2–7 22.2% #229 1,441 0 0
22 1999 47–24 66.2% #5 1,861 1 5 1998 0–1 0.0% #130 1,432 0 0
23 2000 62–19 76.5% #1 2,002 2 10 1999 16–18 47.1% #93 1,552 0 0
24 2001 57–17 77.0% #2 1,912 3 16 2000 6–12 33.3% #121 1,537 0 0
25 2002 24–14 63.2% #37 1,872 3 17 2001 10–18 35.7% #111 1,555 0 0
26 2003 40–19 67.8% #16 1,851 3 19 2002 8–14 36.4% #111 1,555 0 0
27 2004 23–13 63.9% #40 1,812 3 20 2003 3–15 16.7% #183 1,433 0 0
28 2005 3–9 25.0% #291 1,702 3 20 2004 1–3 25.0% #226 1,492 0 0
29 2006 0–1 0.0% #1078 1,678 3 20 2005 1–2 33.3% #209 1,469 0 0
30 2007 2–7 22.2% #680 1,594 3 20 — — — — — — —
31 2008 0–4 0.0% #1150 1,553 3 20 — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — 2008 1–1 50.0% #462 1,468 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Gustavo Kuerten Cecil Mamiit
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 1996 1 1 2 50.0% 5 7 12 41.7% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1997 17 8 25 68.0% 14 8 22 63.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1996 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1998 15 11 26 57.7% 24 11 35 68.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1997 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 1999 20 15 35 57.1% 21 6 27 77.8% 4 1 5 80.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1998 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2000 28 12 40 70.0% 27 4 31 87.1% 2 1 3 66.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 1999 13 12 25 52.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
24 2001 23 12 35 65.7% 33 2 35 94.3% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 2000 6 11 17 35.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
25 2002 10 6 16 62.5% 10 6 16 62.5% — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% 2001 8 14 22 36.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
26 2003 23 10 33 69.7% 14 7 21 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2002 6 9 15 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — —
27 2004 8 8 16 50.0% 15 5 20 75.0% — — — — — — — — 2003 2 9 11 18.2% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
28 2005 1 1 2 50.0% 2 8 10 20.0% — — — — — — — — 2004 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2006 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2005 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
30 2007 1 4 5 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2008 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 147 89 236 62.3% 166 71 237 70.0% 7 7 14 50.0% 19 17 36 52.8% — 39 71 110 35.5% 4 10 14 28.6% 4 13 17 23.5% 1 1 2 50.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 449/523 of Gustavo Kuerten's and 128/143 of Cecil Mamiit's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Gustavo Kuerten Cecil Mamiit
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 1996 17/18 3.4 2.6 53.7% 70.2% 49.5% 47.3% 34.6% 60.9% 35.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 1997 50/57 8.1 3.1 53.4% 74.6% 50.1% 58.7% 40.0% 63.2% 38.1% 1996 3/4 2.7 5.3 45.4% 60.2% 51.2% 50.2% 42.9% 55.3% 33.2%
21 1998 53/63 7.7 2.8 54.7% 75.4% 50.3% 60.2% 47.3% 64.0% 37.5% 1997 8/9 4.4 2.0 59.6% 67.9% 47.4% 49.8% 55.1% 59.7% 35.8%
22 1999 60/71 8.5 2.2 53.6% 78.5% 51.8% 63.8% 49.4% 66.1% 39.3% 1998 1/1 3.0 2.0 61.5% 70.8% 56.7% 42.9% 80.0% 65.4% 42.9%
23 2000 59/81 9.6 2.3 54.2% 78.9% 54.4% 61.4% 40.8% 67.7% 39.7% 1999 32/34 2.6 3.0 57.3% 65.9% 47.7% 50.8% 38.8% 58.0% 39.6%
24 2001 63/74 9.2 2.1 55.5% 79.3% 56.6% 71.1% 41.5% 69.1% 39.9% 2000 14/18 2.4 2.8 54.3% 67.2% 48.8% 56.2% 38.3% 59.0% 36.7%
25 2002 31/38 8.8 1.8 55.6% 75.5% 54.0% 61.6% 45.6% 66.0% 36.7% 2001 23/28 4.2 3.0 58.1% 67.3% 49.1% 61.8% 35.1% 59.7% 36.4%
26 2003 57/59 8.4 2.0 55.6% 76.4% 52.5% 59.4% 41.1% 65.8% 38.5% 2002 20/22 3.5 3.3 57.9% 66.7% 49.9% 60.6% 39.4% 59.5% 37.2%
27 2004 35/36 8.2 2.8 55.4% 74.4% 50.9% 52.6% 50.3% 63.9% 38.4% 2003 18/18 1.8 2.7 62.6% 62.6% 42.3% 49.5% 41.2% 55.2% 34.4%
28 2005 12/12 6.1 3.3 53.0% 66.7% 42.5% 55.7% 34.5% 55.0% 34.2% 2004 4/4 3.8 1.8 51.5% 68.5% 51.2% 54.3% 24.2% 59.9% 37.9%
29 2006 1/1 8.0 3.0 53.2% 76.2% 54.1% 33.3% 16.7% 65.8% 33.0% 2005 3/3 3.7 2.0 68.5% 74.3% 58.9% 36.4% 27.8% 69.5% 36.5%
30 2007 7/9 7.3 2.0 59.7% 75.7% 44.2% 46.4% 33.7% 64.1% 35.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2008 4/4 3.5 2.8 53.8% 66.9% 38.6% 47.0% 27.8% 53.8% 21.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 2/2 5.5 2.0 60.9% 72.3% 51.4% 61.1% 54.2% 63.8% 35.8%
Career — 449/523 8.3 2.4 54.7% 76.3% 52.0% 60.6% 43.2% 65.3% 38.2% — 128/143 3.1 2.9 58.0% 66.4% 48.2% 54.5% 39.5% 58.8% 37.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Gustavo Kuerten Cecil Mamiit
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 1996 1557 123.0 +0.44 -1.62 0.915 48.0% -4 +17 — 39.5% -0.72 5–1 (83%) 3–4 (43%) — +0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1997 1780 149.1 +1.98 +0.21 1.038 50.3% -39 +59 — 56.5% +0.42 15–7 (68%) 12–17 (41%) — -0.79 1996 1471 104.3 +1.39 -2.25 0.743 44.8% +17 — — 18.2% -2.27 0–2 1–1 — -0.21
21 1998 1781 146.0 +2.64 -0.29 1.039 51.0% -43 +127 — 57.6% +0.52 13–8 (62%) 14–12 (54%) — +1.23 1997 1441 108.9 -1.33 -0.30 0.887 47.8% +21 — — 30.4% -1.17 1–2 (33%) 0–2 — +0.42
22 1999 1861 155.1 +4.10 +2.03 1.159 52.5% -64 +127 -209 65.9% +0.88 7–11 (39%) 8–12 (40%) — -0.75 1998 1432 101.1 -0.76 -1.41 1.238 53.7% — — — 33.3% +0.33 0–1 — — +0.13
23 2000 2003 158.1 +5.05 +3.02 1.228 53.2% -43 +160 -329 69.6% +1.16 16–7 (70%) 26–21 (55%) — -0.10 1999 1552 118.6 -2.72 +1.29 0.942 48.7% +21 -25 -7 46.0% -0.43 6–6 (50%) 7–5 (58%) — +1.34
24 2001 1913 159.6 +6.12 +3.01 1.293 54.1% -75 +370 — 70.2% +1.27 17–11 (61%) 18–16 (53%) — +0.65 2000 1538 123.5 -0.49 +0.64 0.895 47.9% +26 — — 38.6% -0.75 1–4 (20%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.42
25 2002 1873 141.6 +3.17 -0.14 1.081 51.3% -18 +227 — 61.0% +0.66 7–8 (47%) 12–12 (50%) — +0.15 2001 1556 118.7 -2.71 -1.19 0.903 48.3% -16 — -31 44.3% -0.54 3–10 (23%) 5–4 (56%) — +1.11
26 2003 1852 149.1 +3.43 +1.34 1.127 52.1% +22 +153 — 61.5% +0.83 11–7 (61%) 19–14 (58%) — +0.95 2002 1556 122.3 -2.06 -0.26 0.918 48.5% +28 — -90 38.9% -0.89 1–3 (25%) 6–1 (86%) — +0.65
27 2004 1813 142.0 +1.63 +1.04 1.065 51.1% -37 +187 — 58.8% +0.51 10–3 (77%) 9–7 (56%) — +0.10 2003 1434 110.8 -4.02 -1.08 0.769 45.2% +49 +79 +15 26.7% -1.56 1–4 (20%) 4–4 (50%) — -0.14
28 2005 1703 118.6 -2.63 -2.14 0.761 45.0% — +122 — 32.1% -1.36 — 1–2 (33%) — -1.09 2004 1493 110.5 -0.62 +1.04 0.944 49.1% +47 — — 37.5% -0.38 1–1 — — -0.32
29 2006 1678 99.4 -0.70 -0.57 0.965 48.2% — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 — — +0.12 2005 1469 101.4 +0.98 -1.17 1.195 52.7% +44 — — 60.0% +1.00 0–1 — — +0.37
30 2007 1594 112.2 -0.10 -1.70 0.979 49.6% +102 +144 — 26.3% -1.16 0–1 0–3 (0%) — +0.13 2006 1430 95.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2008 1553 104.1 -3.30 -4.26 0.474 39.4% — +130 — 0.0% -3.56 — — — -0.18 2007 1433 89.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1469 105.8 -0.73 -1.29 0.989 49.4% — — — 40.0% -0.40 1–0 0–1 — +0.10
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1449 98.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1440 101.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1432 98.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2138 154.8 +3.30 +1.14 1.102 51.6% -36 +170 -254 61.0% +0.68 101–65 (61%) 122–120 (50%) 98.7 +0.12 — 1631 117.9 -2.17 -0.11 0.899 48.0% +20 +21 -35 39.3% -0.78 15–34 (31%) 24–20 (55%) 99.3 +2.12

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.