H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

Gustavo Kuerten vs Gianluca Pozzi H2H: 2-0

Gustavo Kuerten holds a 2–0 lead over Gianluca Pozzi in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Gustavo Kuerten leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Gustavo Kuerten won the 2000 Cincinnati Open round of 32 7-5 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Gustavo Kuerten
BRA Age 49 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Gianluca Pozzi
ITA Age 61 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Gustavo Kuerten #4 7-5 6-3 Gianluca Pozzi #49 Match data Aug 10, 2000* R32 Cincinnati Open Masters 1000 Hard
Gustavo Kuerten #6 6-4 7-6(3) Gianluca Pozzi #83 Match data Mar 25, 2000* R16 Miami Open Masters 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Gustavo Kuerten #1,132 #1 4,750 2,137 339 184 64.8% 3 5 1 4 7 20
Gianluca Pozzi #1,466 #40 864 1,783 173 258 40.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Gustavo Kuerten Gianluca Pozzi
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1996 8–10 44.4% #88 1,556 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1997 34–23 59.6% #14 1,780 1 1 — — — — — — —
21 1998 39–24 61.9% #23 1,781 1 3 1986 0–2 0.0% #277 1,480 0 0
22 1999 47–24 66.2% #5 1,861 1 5 1987 1–2 33.3% #153 1,501 0 0
23 2000 62–19 76.5% #1 2,002 2 10 1988 4–8 33.3% #165 1,507 0 0
24 2001 57–17 77.0% #2 1,912 3 16 1989 7–11 38.9% #179 1,531 0 0
25 2002 24–14 63.2% #37 1,872 3 17 1990 1–8 11.1% #185 1,459 0 0
26 2003 40–19 67.8% #16 1,851 3 19 1991 16–13 55.2% #76 1,696 0 1
27 2004 23–13 63.9% #40 1,812 3 20 1992 28–28 50.0% #68 1,708 0 1
28 2005 3–9 25.0% #291 1,702 3 20 1993 13–26 33.3% #107 1,560 0 1
29 2006 0–1 0.0% #1078 1,678 3 20 1994 11–18 37.9% #93 1,608 0 1
30 2007 2–7 22.2% #680 1,594 3 20 1995 10–22 31.2% #138 1,555 0 1
31 2008 0–4 0.0% #1150 1,553 3 20 1996 7–14 33.3% #107 1,531 0 1
32 — — — — — — — 1997 3–7 30.0% #101 1,508 0 1
33 — — — — — — — 1998 22–27 44.9% #61 1,653 0 1
34 — — — — — — — 1999 16–26 38.1% #94 1,602 0 1
35 — — — — — — — 2000 27–23 54.0% #43 1,724 0 1
36 — — — — — — — 2001 7–23 23.3% #155 1,494 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Gustavo Kuerten Gianluca Pozzi
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 1996 1 1 2 50.0% 5 7 12 41.7% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1997 17 8 25 68.0% 14 8 22 63.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1998 15 11 26 57.7% 24 11 35 68.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1986 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
22 1999 20 15 35 57.1% 21 6 27 77.8% 4 1 5 80.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1987 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 2000 28 12 40 70.0% 27 4 31 87.1% 2 1 3 66.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 1988 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2001 23 12 35 65.7% 33 2 35 94.3% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 1989 7 10 17 41.2% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 2002 10 6 16 62.5% 10 6 16 62.5% — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% 1990 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
26 2003 23 10 33 69.7% 14 7 21 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1991 11 8 19 57.9% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
27 2004 8 8 16 50.0% 15 5 20 75.0% — — — — — — — — 1992 17 18 35 48.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7%
28 2005 1 1 2 50.0% 2 8 10 20.0% — — — — — — — — 1993 8 15 23 34.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 6 9 33.3%
29 2006 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1994 7 11 18 38.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
30 2007 1 4 5 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — 1995 3 11 14 21.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 4 6 10 40.0%
31 2008 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1996 3 7 10 30.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — 0 3 3 0.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 12 13 25 48.0% 2 6 8 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 4 5 9 44.4%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 11 14 25 44.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 12 14 26 46.2% 2 3 5 40.0% 10 4 14 71.4% 3 2 5 60.0%
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 6 12 18 33.3% 0 5 5 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
Career — 147 89 236 62.3% 166 71 237 70.0% 7 7 14 50.0% 19 17 36 52.8% — 105 149 254 41.3% 6 34 40 15.0% 32 36 68 47.1% 30 39 69 43.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Gustavo Kuerten Gianluca Pozzi
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 1996 1557 123.0 +0.44 -1.62 0.915 48.0% -4 +17 — 39.5% -0.72 5–1 (83%) 3–4 (43%) 106.9 +0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1997 1780 149.1 +1.98 +0.21 1.038 50.3% -39 +59 — 56.5% +0.42 15–7 (68%) 12–17 (41%) 105.3 -0.79 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1998 1781 146.0 +2.64 -0.29 1.039 51.0% -43 +127 — 57.6% +0.52 13–8 (62%) 14–12 (54%) 103.2 +1.23 1986 1480 97.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.75 — — — +0.06
22 1999 1861 155.1 +4.10 +2.03 1.159 52.5% -64 +127 -209 65.9% +0.88 7–11 (39%) 8–12 (40%) 94.2 -0.75 1987 1501 105.9 — — — — — — — 37.5% -1.25 — — — -0.04
23 2000 2003 158.1 +5.05 +3.02 1.228 53.2% -43 +160 -329 69.6% +1.16 16–7 (70%) 26–21 (55%) 104.6 -0.10 1988 1508 113.8 — — — — +65 — — 33.3% -1.00 1–3 (25%) 2–2 (50%) 97.9 +0.72
24 2001 1913 159.6 +6.12 +3.01 1.293 54.1% -75 +370 — 70.2% +1.27 17–11 (61%) 18–16 (53%) 95.3 +0.65 1989 1532 111.7 — — — — +42 — — 41.7% -0.56 3–4 (43%) 2–2 (50%) 99.0 +1.01
25 2002 1873 141.6 +3.17 -0.14 1.081 51.3% -18 +227 — 61.0% +0.66 7–8 (47%) 12–12 (50%) 92.4 +0.15 1990 1460 99.5 — — — — +55 — — 22.7% -2.14 0–2 3–0 (100%) — +0.74
26 2003 1852 149.1 +3.43 +1.34 1.127 52.1% +22 +153 — 61.5% +0.83 11–7 (61%) 19–14 (58%) 99.8 +0.95 1991 1697 135.0 — — — — +11 — -143 52.8% +0.04 6–6 (50%) 5–5 (50%) 104.0 -0.02
27 2004 1813 142.0 +1.63 +1.04 1.065 51.1% -37 +187 — 58.8% +0.51 10–3 (77%) 9–7 (56%) 101.1 +0.10 1992 1709 135.4 — — — — +34 -217 -129 46.6% -0.12 17–7 (71%) 6–10 (38%) 106.9 +0.05
28 2005 1703 118.6 -2.63 -2.14 0.761 45.0% — +122 — 32.1% -1.36 — 1–2 (33%) — -1.09 1993 1560 119.9 — — — — +30 — +12 35.1% -1.37 7–7 (50%) 11–4 (73%) 104.3 -1.02
29 2006 1678 99.4 -0.70 -0.57 0.965 48.2% — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 — — +0.12 1994 1608 117.5 — — — — +43 — -94 40.5% -0.71 6–6 (50%) 5–6 (45%) 102.3 +1.46
30 2007 1594 112.2 -0.10 -1.70 0.979 49.6% +102 +144 — 26.3% -1.16 0–1 0–3 (0%) — +0.13 1995 1555 119.8 — — — — +23 — +2 35.1% -1.13 1–4 (20%) 2–6 (25%) 95.3 +0.52
31 2008 1553 104.1 -3.30 -4.26 0.474 39.4% — +130 — 0.0% -3.56 — — — -0.18 1996 1531 114.7 — — — — +18 — +61 37.3% -0.82 2–3 (40%) 2–2 (50%) 97.9 +0.29
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1509 109.9 — — — — +20 — — 31.8% -1.36 1–1 2–0 — +0.87
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1654 134.1 — — — — +15 -252 -36 46.2% -0.16 6–6 (50%) 8–9 (47%) 101.5 +0.09
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1602 130.9 — — — — +37 -205 +16 41.8% -0.45 6–11 (35%) 4–5 (44%) 97.0 -0.01
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1725 134.1 — — — — -41 -313 +22 50.8% +0.11 12–8 (60%) 12–5 (71%) 108.8 -1.12
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1494 121.1 — — — — +82 -133 +119 28.8% -1.23 1–7 (13%) 3–5 (38%) 91.1 +0.16
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1486 101.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2138 154.8 +3.30 +1.14 1.102 51.6% -36 +170 -254 61.0% +0.68 101–65 (61%) 122–120 (50%) 98.7 +0.12 — 1784 130.8 — — — — +26 -227 -13 41.5% -0.58 69–75 (48%) 67–61 (52%) 104.3 +0.87

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.