H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 01:16 UTC

Gustavo Kuerten vs Greg Rusedski H2H: 1-4

Greg Rusedski holds a 4–1 lead over Gustavo Kuerten in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Greg Rusedski leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Greg Rusedski won the 2001 Australian Open second round 4-6 6-4 6-3 2-6 9-7.

BRA Age 49 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1 4
5 main draw meetings
GBR Age 52 Left-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 19, 2001* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Greg Rusedski #65 4-6 6-4 6-3 2-6 9-7 Gustavo Kuerten #1 Match data
Oct 1, 1999* Grand Slam Cup ATP Finals R16 Hard Greg Rusedski #6 6-3 3-6 6-3 Gustavo Kuerten #5 Match data
Jan 14, 1999* Sydney ATP 250 R32 Hard Gustavo Kuerten #23 1-6 6-3 6-4 Greg Rusedski #9 Match data
Jun 19, 1997* Nottingham ATP 250 R32 Grass Greg Rusedski #37 6-1 7-5 Gustavo Kuerten #12 Match data
Oct 12, 1996* Beijing ATP 250 QF Carpet Greg Rusedski #75 6-3 6-4 Gustavo Kuerten #105 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Gustavo Kuerten #1,132 #1 4,750 2,140 336 182 64.9% 3 5 1 0 11 20
Greg Rusedski #944 #4 3,094 2,049 415 276 60.1% 0 1 1 0 13 15

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Gustavo Kuerten Greg Rusedski
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1992 2–2 50.0% #161 1,525 0 0
19 1996 8–10 44.4% #88 1,556 0 0 1993 16–9 64.0% #50 1,750 0 1
20 1997 34–23 59.6% #14 1,779 1 1 1994 21–29 42.0% #114 1,681 0 1
21 1998 39–24 61.9% #23 1,781 1 3 1995 34–25 57.6% #37 1,699 0 2
22 1999 47–24 66.2% #5 1,860 1 5 1996 36–25 59.0% #48 1,805 0 3
23 2000 59–18 76.6% #1 2,012 2 10 1997 53–23 69.7% #6 1,950 0 5
24 2001 57–17 77.0% #2 1,915 3 16 1998 50–22 69.4% #9 2,011 0 7
25 2002 24–14 63.2% #37 1,874 3 17 1999 46–22 67.6% #14 1,976 0 9
26 2003 40–19 67.8% #16 1,854 3 19 2000 19–19 50.0% #69 1,802 0 9
27 2004 23–12 65.7% #40 1,834 3 20 2001 37–24 60.7% #31 1,807 0 10
28 2005 3–9 25.0% #291 1,714 3 20 2002 33–16 67.3% #31 1,904 0 12
29 2006 0–1 0.0% #1078 1,689 3 20 2003 11–8 57.9% #119 1,825 0 13
30 2007 2–7 22.2% #680 1,601 3 20 2004 24–15 61.5% #46 1,819 0 14
31 2008 0–4 0.0% #1150 1,560 3 20 2005 27–22 55.1% #37 1,780 0 15
32 2006 6–15 28.6% #191 1,638 0 15