H2H data updated: 2026-09-04 00:00 UTC

Gustavo Kuerten vs Greg Rusedski H2H: 1-4

Greg Rusedski holds a 4–1 lead over Gustavo Kuerten in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Greg Rusedski leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Greg Rusedski won the 2001 Australian Open round of 64 4-6 6-4 6-3 2-6 9-7.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Gustavo Kuerten
BRA Age 49 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1 – 4
5 main draw meetings
Greg Rusedski
GBR Age 52 Left-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Greg Rusedski #65 4-6 6-4 6-3 2-6 9-7 Gustavo Kuerten #1 Match data Jan 19, 2001* R64 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Greg Rusedski #6 6-3 3-6 6-3 Gustavo Kuerten #5 Match data Oct 1, 1999* R16 Grand Slam Cup ATP Finals Hard
Gustavo Kuerten #23 1-6 6-3 6-4 Greg Rusedski #9 Match data Jan 14, 1999* R32 Sydney International ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Greg Rusedski #37 6-1 7-5 Gustavo Kuerten #12 Match data Jun 19, 1997* R32 Eastbourne Open World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Grass
Greg Rusedski #75 6-3 6-4 Gustavo Kuerten #105 Match data Oct 12, 1996* QF China Open World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Gustavo Kuerten #1,132 #1 4,750 2,137 339 184 64.8% 3 5 1 4 7 20
Greg Rusedski #944 #4 3,094 2,052 417 278 60.0% 0 1 1 3 10 15

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Gustavo Kuerten Greg Rusedski
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1992 2–2 50.0% #161 1,525 0 0
19 1996 8–10 44.4% #88 1,556 0 0 1993 16–9 64.0% #50 1,750 0 1
20 1997 34–23 59.6% #14 1,780 1 1 1994 21–29 42.0% #114 1,682 0 1
21 1998 39–24 61.9% #23 1,781 1 3 1995 34–25 57.6% #37 1,699 0 2
22 1999 47–24 66.2% #5 1,861 1 5 1996 38–26 59.4% #48 1,816 0 3
23 2000 62–19 76.5% #1 2,002 2 10 1997 53–23 69.7% #6 1,941 0 5
24 2001 57–17 77.0% #2 1,912 3 16 1998 50–22 69.4% #9 2,011 0 7
25 2002 24–14 63.2% #37 1,872 3 17 1999 46–22 67.6% #14 1,970 0 9
26 2003 40–19 67.8% #16 1,851 3 19 2000 19–20 48.7% #69 1,796 0 9
27 2004 23–13 63.9% #40 1,812 3 20 2001 37–24 60.7% #31 1,809 0 10
28 2005 3–9 25.0% #291 1,702 3 20 2002 33–16 67.3% #31 1,902 0 12
29 2006 0–1 0.0% #1078 1,678 3 20 2003 11–8 57.9% #119 1,823 0 13
30 2007 2–7 22.2% #680 1,594 3 20 2004 24–15 61.5% #46 1,821 0 14
31 2008 0–4 0.0% #1150 1,553 3 20 2005 27–22 55.1% #37 1,786 0 15
32 — — — — — — — 2006 6–15 28.6% #191 1,640 0 15

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Gustavo Kuerten Greg Rusedski
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1996 1 1 2 50.0% 5 7 12 41.7% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 1993 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — 5 1 6 83.3% 8 2 10 80.0%
20 1997 17 8 25 68.0% 14 8 22 63.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1994 9 15 24 37.5% 2 5 7 28.6% 6 4 10 60.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
21 1998 15 11 26 57.7% 24 11 35 68.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1995 23 15 38 60.5% 5 2 7 71.4% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5%
22 1999 20 15 35 57.1% 21 6 27 77.8% 4 1 5 80.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1996 19 15 34 55.9% 4 4 8 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 10 4 14 71.4%
23 2000 28 12 40 70.0% 27 4 31 87.1% 2 1 3 66.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 1997 19 11 30 63.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 13 2 15 86.7% 18 6 24 75.0%
24 2001 23 12 35 65.7% 33 2 35 94.3% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 1998 34 11 45 75.6% 1 5 6 16.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 14 4 18 77.8%
25 2002 10 6 16 62.5% 10 6 16 62.5% — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% 1999 25 10 35 71.4% 4 5 9 44.4% 8 3 11 72.7% 9 4 13 69.2%
26 2003 23 10 33 69.7% 14 7 21 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2000 14 12 26 53.8% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
27 2004 8 8 16 50.0% 15 5 20 75.0% — — — — — — — — 2001 23 15 38 60.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 9 3 12 75.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
28 2005 1 1 2 50.0% 2 8 10 20.0% — — — — — — — — 2002 24 11 35 68.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 3 1 4 75.0%
29 2006 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2003 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 8 2 10 80.0% — — — —
30 2007 1 4 5 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — 2004 9 8 17 52.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 7 2 9 77.8%
31 2008 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2005 14 13 27 51.9% 1 4 5 20.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 4 9 13 30.8% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
Career — 147 89 236 62.3% 166 71 237 70.0% 7 7 14 50.0% 19 17 36 52.8% — 225 158 383 58.7% 25 45 70 35.7% 82 35 117 70.1% 85 40 125 68.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 449/523 of Gustavo Kuerten's and 600/695 of Greg Rusedski's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Gustavo Kuerten Greg Rusedski
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1992 4/4 9.8 7.0 51.6% 77.5% 36.6% 52.3% 35.2% 57.2% 41.6%
19 1996 17/18 3.4 2.6 53.7% 70.2% 49.5% 47.3% 34.6% 60.9% 35.8% 1993 23/25 14.0 4.9 57.6% 82.3% 54.7% 68.5% 39.0% 70.5% 32.3%
20 1997 50/57 8.1 3.1 53.4% 74.6% 50.1% 58.7% 40.0% 63.2% 38.1% 1994 46/50 9.2 5.2 56.6% 78.6% 51.6% 59.6% 32.6% 66.8% 34.0%
21 1998 53/63 7.7 2.8 54.7% 75.4% 50.3% 60.2% 47.3% 64.0% 37.5% 1995 50/59 11.7 6.1 56.7% 81.6% 49.8% 64.1% 40.5% 67.8% 34.9%
22 1999 60/71 8.5 2.2 53.6% 78.5% 51.8% 63.8% 49.4% 66.1% 39.3% 1996 53/64 11.6 2.9 60.5% 81.7% 53.2% 57.4% 39.6% 70.7% 36.8%
23 2000 59/81 9.6 2.3 54.2% 78.9% 54.4% 61.4% 40.8% 67.7% 39.7% 1997 61/76 14.0 4.6 57.5% 85.1% 57.1% 67.5% 45.1% 73.2% 35.2%
24 2001 63/74 9.2 2.1 55.5% 79.3% 56.6% 71.1% 41.5% 69.1% 39.9% 1998 59/72 12.0 5.0 55.8% 82.2% 54.4% 68.1% 41.7% 69.8% 35.3%
25 2002 31/38 8.8 1.8 55.6% 75.5% 54.0% 61.6% 45.6% 66.0% 36.7% 1999 51/68 10.5 4.7 58.2% 80.2% 54.7% 62.4% 35.4% 69.4% 35.5%
26 2003 57/59 8.4 2.0 55.6% 76.4% 52.5% 59.4% 41.1% 65.8% 38.5% 2000 35/39 9.0 5.0 57.8% 76.0% 52.5% 67.6% 37.4% 66.1% 35.5%
27 2004 35/36 8.2 2.8 55.4% 74.4% 50.9% 52.6% 50.3% 63.9% 38.4% 2001 52/61 10.3 3.4 58.7% 80.6% 54.5% 60.6% 36.9% 69.8% 36.4%
28 2005 12/12 6.1 3.3 53.0% 66.7% 42.5% 55.7% 34.5% 55.0% 34.2% 2002 39/49 11.0 4.0 60.9% 79.5% 54.3% 71.1% 41.1% 69.6% 34.3%
29 2006 1/1 8.0 3.0 53.2% 76.2% 54.1% 33.3% 16.7% 65.8% 33.0% 2003 19/19 12.4 4.0 63.5% 78.9% 56.2% 72.5% 43.3% 70.5% 33.7%
30 2007 7/9 7.3 2.0 59.7% 75.7% 44.2% 46.4% 33.7% 64.1% 35.1% 2004 39/39 11.2 5.6 60.0% 78.2% 53.7% 68.1% 45.0% 68.3% 32.2%
31 2008 4/4 3.5 2.8 53.8% 66.9% 38.6% 47.0% 27.8% 53.8% 21.9% 2005 48/49 9.6 5.8 57.5% 77.2% 53.4% 69.9% 33.8% 67.0% 31.6%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 21/21 6.2 4.5 60.8% 66.8% 47.5% 53.1% 38.7% 59.3% 31.1%
Career — 449/523 8.3 2.4 54.7% 76.3% 52.0% 60.6% 43.2% 65.3% 38.2% — 600/695 11.0 4.7 58.3% 79.9% 53.5% 64.8% 39.2% 68.8% 34.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Gustavo Kuerten Greg Rusedski
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1526 107.0 -1.85 +0.57 0.973 49.7% +36 — — 44.4% -0.67 1–0 1–0 — +0.33
19 1996 1557 123.0 +0.44 -1.62 0.915 48.0% -4 +17 — 39.5% -0.72 5–1 (83%) 3–4 (43%) 106.9 +0.21 1993 1751 140.1 +5.69 -3.01 1.097 51.2% -45 — -48 56.7% +0.22 10–5 (67%) 14–14 (50%) 108.0 +0.39
20 1997 1780 149.1 +1.98 +0.21 1.038 50.3% -39 +59 — 56.5% +0.42 15–7 (68%) 12–17 (41%) 105.3 -0.79 1994 1683 135.7 +4.03 -2.97 1.022 50.1% -25 -116 +29 46.6% -0.07 8–14 (36%) 15–19 (44%) 96.1 -1.22
21 1998 1781 146.0 +2.64 -0.29 1.039 51.0% -43 +127 — 57.6% +0.52 13–8 (62%) 14–12 (54%) 103.2 +1.23 1995 1699 145.1 +4.49 -2.03 1.085 51.6% +23 -70 +37 56.7% +0.38 8–11 (42%) 22–16 (58%) 101.1 -0.02
22 1999 1861 155.1 +4.10 +2.03 1.159 52.5% -64 +127 -209 65.9% +0.88 7–11 (39%) 8–12 (40%) 94.2 -0.75 1996 1816 150.0 +6.92 +0.08 1.258 53.0% +15 -174 -46 56.9% +0.43 12–11 (52%) 26–20 (57%) 103.7 -1.78
23 2000 2003 158.1 +5.05 +3.02 1.228 53.2% -43 +160 -329 69.6% +1.16 16–7 (70%) 26–21 (55%) 104.6 -0.10 1997 1942 156.9 +9.49 -0.70 1.316 53.9% +9 -283 -3 66.8% +0.94 16–12 (57%) 27–18 (60%) 107.0 -3.68
24 2001 1913 159.6 +6.12 +3.01 1.293 54.1% -75 +370 — 70.2% +1.27 17–11 (61%) 18–16 (53%) 95.3 +0.65 1998 2012 159.3 +6.82 -1.21 1.168 52.2% +36 -417 -143 63.6% +0.73 16–5 (76%) 30–15 (67%) 110.1 -1.21
25 2002 1873 141.6 +3.17 -0.14 1.081 51.3% -18 +227 — 61.0% +0.66 7–8 (47%) 12–12 (50%) 92.4 +0.15 1999 1971 155.1 +6.15 -1.39 1.158 52.0% +40 -346 -93 63.5% +0.81 12–9 (57%) 19–14 (58%) 99.1 -0.97
26 2003 1852 149.1 +3.43 +1.34 1.127 52.1% +22 +153 — 61.5% +0.83 11–7 (61%) 19–14 (58%) 99.8 +0.95 2000 1796 149.4 +3.25 -1.02 1.047 50.8% +86 -203 +44 51.1% +0.01 3–7 (30%) 16–10 (62%) 95.3 -3.02
27 2004 1813 142.0 +1.63 +1.04 1.065 51.1% -37 +187 — 58.8% +0.51 10–3 (77%) 9–7 (56%) 101.1 +0.10 2001 1810 149.1 +6.33 -0.53 1.203 52.7% +5 -205 +93 59.1% +0.65 6–5 (55%) 21–16 (57%) 101.3 -1.81
28 2005 1703 118.6 -2.63 -2.14 0.761 45.0% — +122 — 32.1% -1.36 — 1–2 (33%) — -1.09 2002 1902 150.0 +6.06 -1.57 1.129 51.6% +23 — -18 61.0% +0.69 15–7 (68%) 16–15 (52%) 104.0 -2.14
29 2006 1678 99.4 -0.70 -0.57 0.965 48.2% — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 — — +0.12 2003 1824 128.0 +5.26 -0.65 1.144 51.8% +15 — +122 56.0% +0.26 3–4 (43%) 6–6 (50%) 95.2 -1.36
30 2007 1594 112.2 -0.10 -1.70 0.979 49.6% +102 +144 — 26.3% -1.16 0–1 0–3 (0%) — +0.13 2004 1821 132.1 +3.67 -2.78 1.017 50.5% -4 — +106 55.7% +0.14 12–8 (60%) 22–10 (69%) 107.8 -0.15
31 2008 1553 104.1 -3.30 -4.26 0.474 39.4% — +130 — 0.0% -3.56 — — — -0.18 2005 1787 139.4 +3.29 -2.83 0.958 49.7% -6 -261 +180 49.6% +0.03 14–3 (82%) 14–17 (45%) 104.6 -1.02
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1641 131.5 -1.70 -3.52 0.764 46.0% +59 -130 — 29.8% -1.21 2–1 (67%) 3–6 (33%) 100.7 -1.33
Career — 2138 154.8 +3.30 +1.14 1.102 51.6% -36 +170 -254 61.0% +0.68 101–65 (61%) 122–120 (50%) 98.7 +0.12 — 2053 153.7 +5.40 -1.57 1.110 51.5% +18 -222 +32 57.4% +0.42 138–102 (58%) 252–196 (56%) 107.0 -2.75

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.