H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 07:16 UTC
Gustavo Kuerten vs John Van Lottum H2H: 2-0
Gustavo Kuerten holds a 2–0 lead over John Van Lottum in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Gustavo Kuerten leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Gustavo Kuerten won the 2004 Australian Open first round 5-7 6-0 6-1 2-6 8-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BRA
Age 49
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
NED
Age 50
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 21, 2004* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Gustavo Kuerten | 5-7 6-0 6-1 2-6 8-6 | John Van Lottum | Match data |
| Jun 25, 2003* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Gustavo Kuerten | 2-6 3-2 (ret.) | John Van Lottum | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gustavo Kuerten | #1,132 | #1 | 4,750 | 2,140 | 336 | 182 | 64.9% | 3 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 11 | 20 |
| John Van Lottum | — | — | — | 1,719 | — | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Gustavo Kuerten | John Van Lottum | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1996 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #88 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1997 | 34–23 | 59.6% | #14 | 1,779 | 1 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1998 | 39–24 | 61.9% | #23 | 1,781 | 1 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1999 | 47–24 | 66.2% | #5 | 1,860 | 1 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2000 | 59–18 | 76.6% | #1 | 2,012 | 2 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2001 | 57–17 | 77.0% | #2 | 1,915 | 3 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2002 | 24–14 | 63.2% | #37 | 1,874 | 3 | 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2003 | 40–19 | 67.8% | #16 | 1,854 | 3 | 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2004 | 23–12 | 65.7% | #40 | 1,834 | 3 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2005 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #291 | 1,714 | 3 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1078 | 1,689 | 3 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2007 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #680 | 1,601 | 3 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2008 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #1150 | 1,560 | 3 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |