H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Gustavo Kuerten vs Jonas Bjorkman H2H: 1-1
Gustavo Kuerten and Jonas Bjorkman are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Gustavo Kuerten leads 1–0 on clay, while Jonas Bjorkman leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jonas Bjorkman won the 1997 US Open third round 6-3 6-1 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BRA
Age 49
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
SWE
Age 54
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 31, 1997* | US Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Jonas Bjorkman | 6-3 6-1 7-5 | Gustavo Kuerten | Match data |
| May 30, 1997* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Gustavo Kuerten | 6-4 6-2 4-6 7-5 | Jonas Bjorkman | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gustavo Kuerten | #1,132 | #1 | 4,750 | 2,140 | 336 | 182 | 64.9% | 3 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 11 | 20 |
| Jonas Bjorkman | #685 | #4 | 3,022 | 2,036 | 395 | 341 | 53.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Gustavo Kuerten | Jonas Bjorkman | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1996 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #88 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #700 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1997 | 34–23 | 59.6% | #14 | 1,779 | 1 | 1 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #333 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1998 | 39–24 | 61.9% | #23 | 1,781 | 1 | 3 | 1993 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #96 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1999 | 47–24 | 66.2% | #5 | 1,860 | 1 | 5 | 1994 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #50 | 1,751 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2000 | 59–18 | 76.6% | #1 | 2,012 | 2 | 10 | 1995 | 34–27 | 55.7% | #30 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2001 | 57–17 | 77.0% | #2 | 1,915 | 3 | 16 | 1996 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #69 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2002 | 24–14 | 63.2% | #37 | 1,874 | 3 | 17 | 1997 | 66–25 | 72.5% | #4 | 2,006 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2003 | 40–19 | 67.8% | #16 | 1,854 | 3 | 19 | 1998 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #24 | 1,874 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 2004 | 23–12 | 65.7% | #40 | 1,834 | 3 | 20 | 1999 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #73 | 1,745 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 2005 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #291 | 1,714 | 3 | 20 | 2000 | 30–25 | 54.5% | #44 | 1,778 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1078 | 1,689 | 3 | 20 | 2001 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #60 | 1,736 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2007 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #680 | 1,601 | 3 | 20 | 2002 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #48 | 1,748 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | 2008 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #1150 | 1,560 | 3 | 20 | 2003 | 30–19 | 61.2% | #30 | 1,838 | 0 | 5 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #70 | 1,686 | 0 | 5 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #62 | 1,744 | 0 | 6 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #54 | 1,677 | 0 | 6 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #59 | 1,658 | 0 | 6 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #172 | 1,652 | 0 | 6 |