H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Gustavo Kuerten vs Mark Philippoussis H2H: 2-2

Gustavo Kuerten and Mark Philippoussis are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while Gustavo Kuerten leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Gustavo Kuerten won the 2003 Paris Masters third round 6-7(5) 7-6(11) 7-6(1).

BRA Age 49 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
2 2
4 main draw meetings
AUS Age 49 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 30, 2003* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R32 Carpet Gustavo Kuerten #17 6-7(5) 7-6(11) 7-6(1) Mark Philippoussis #12 Match data
Aug 2, 2003* Los Angeles ATP 250 QF Hard Mark Philippoussis #20 6-3 3-6 7-6(5) Gustavo Kuerten #13 Match data
Nov 19, 2000* Paris Masters Masters 1000 SF Carpet Mark Philippoussis #14 7-6(5) 7-6(11) Gustavo Kuerten #3 Match data
May 11, 2000* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Gustavo Kuerten #6 6-2 6-2 Mark Philippoussis #24 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Gustavo Kuerten #1,132 #1 4,750 2,140 336 182 64.9% 3 5 1 0 11 20
Mark Philippoussis #1,115 #8 2,296 2,022 287 190 60.2% 0 1 0 0 10 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Gustavo Kuerten Mark Philippoussis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1994 1–3 25.0% #274 1,492 0 0
18 1995 25–17 59.5% #38 1,764 0 0
19 1996 8–10 44.4% #88 1,556 0 0 1996 31–22 58.5% #30 1,838 0 1
20 1997 34–23 59.6% #14 1,779 1 1 1997 43–18 70.5% #18 1,852 0 4
21 1998 39–24 61.9% #23 1,781 1 3 1998 31–19 62.0% #15 1,906 0 5
22 1999 47–24 66.2% #5 1,860 1 5 1999 30–15 66.7% #19 1,892 0 7
23 2000 59–18 76.6% #1 2,012 2 10 2000 40–21 65.6% #11 1,894 0 8
24 2001 57–17 77.0% #2 1,915 3 16 2001 10–8 55.6% #104 1,803 0 9
25 2002 24–14 63.2% #37 1,874 3 17 2002 14–14 50.0% #80 1,772 0 9
26 2003 40–19 67.8% #16 1,854 3 19 2003 34–18 65.4% #9 1,881 0 10
27 2004 23–12 65.7% #40 1,834 3 20 2004 8–15 34.8% #109 1,669 0 10
28 2005 3–9 25.0% #291 1,714 3 20 2005 9–11 45.0% #171 1,659 0 10
29 2006 0–1 0.0% #1078 1,689 3 20 2006 11–9 55.0% #114 1,732 0 11
30 2007 2–7 22.2% #680 1,601 3 20
31 2008 0–4 0.0% #1150 1,560 3 20