H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Gustavo Kuerten vs Michael Chang H2H: 3-2

Gustavo Kuerten holds a 3–2 lead over Michael Chang in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Michael Chang leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Gustavo Kuerten leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Gustavo Kuerten won the 2001 Rome Masters third round 6-1 6-1.

BRA Age 49 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
3 2
5 main draw meetings
USA Age 54 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 10, 2001* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Gustavo Kuerten #1 6-1 6-1 Michael Chang #32 Match data
Jun 4, 2000* Roland Garros Grand Slam R32 Clay Gustavo Kuerten #5 6-3 6-7(9) 6-1 6-4 Michael Chang #33 Match data
Feb 21, 1998* Memphis ATP 250 SF Hard Michael Chang #5 7-6(7) 7-6(4) Gustavo Kuerten #11 Match data
Aug 10, 1997* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 QF Hard Michael Chang #2 6-1 6-2 Gustavo Kuerten #10 Match data
Aug 3, 1997* Canada Masters Masters 1000 SF Hard Gustavo Kuerten #13 6-3 6-1 Michael Chang #2 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Gustavo Kuerten #1,132 #1 4,750 2,140 336 182 64.9% 3 5 1 0 11 20
Michael Chang #1,039 #2 4,065 2,110 648 303 68.1% 1 7 0 0 26 34

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Gustavo Kuerten Michael Chang
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1987 4–4 50.0% #163 1,559 0 0
16 1988 23–13 63.9% #30 1,842 0 1
17 1989 45–17 72.6% #5 1,971 1 3
18 1990 34–19 64.2% #15 1,917 1 4
19 1996 8–10 44.4% #88 1,556 0 0 1991 47–20 70.1% #15 2,002 1 5
20 1997 34–23 59.6% #14 1,779 1 1 1992 57–22 72.2% #6 1,975 1 8
21 1998 39–24 61.9% #23 1,781 1 3 1993 62–21 74.7% #8 1,992 1 13
22 1999 47–24 66.2% #5 1,860 1 5 1994 66–19 77.6% #6 2,005 1 19
23 2000 59–18 76.6% #1 2,012 2 10 1995 65–19 77.4% #5 2,008 1 23
24 2001 57–17 77.0% #2 1,915 3 16 1996 63–19 76.8% #2 1,985 1 26
25 2002 24–14 63.2% #37 1,874 3 17 1997 53–18 74.6% #3 1,910 1 31
26 2003 40–19 67.8% #16 1,854 3 19 1998 35–16 68.6% #29 1,838 1 33
27 2004 23–12 65.7% #40 1,834 3 20 1999 27–22 55.1% #50 1,788 1 33
28 2005 3–9 25.0% #291 1,714 3 20 2000 42–25 62.7% #32 1,818 1 34
29 2006 0–1 0.0% #1078 1,689 3 20 2001 16–21 43.2% #94 1,701 1 34
30 2007 2–7 22.2% #680 1,601 3 20 2002 7–18 28.0% #124 1,625 1 34
31 2008 0–4 0.0% #1150 1,560 3 20 2003 2–10 16.7% #383 1,551 1 34