H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Gustavo Kuerten vs Radek Stepanek H2H: 0-2
Radek Stepanek holds a 2–0 lead over Gustavo Kuerten in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Radek Stepanek leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Radek Stepanek won the 2003 Australian Open second round 5-7 6-3 7-5 4-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BRA
Age 49
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 47
Right-Handed
186 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 17, 2003* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Radek Stepanek | 5-7 6-3 7-5 4-6 6-3 | Gustavo Kuerten | Match data |
| Oct 30, 2002* | Paris Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Carpet | Radek Stepanek | 4-6 6-3 7-6(3) | Gustavo Kuerten | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gustavo Kuerten | #1,132 | #1 | 4,750 | 2,140 | 336 | 182 | 64.9% | 3 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 11 | 20 |
| Radek Stepanek | #492 | #8 | 2,700 | 2,034 | 366 | 283 | 56.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Gustavo Kuerten | Radek Stepanek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1996 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #88 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #165 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1997 | 34–23 | 59.6% | #14 | 1,779 | 1 | 1 | 1999 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #169 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1998 | 39–24 | 61.9% | #23 | 1,781 | 1 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1999 | 47–24 | 66.2% | #5 | 1,860 | 1 | 5 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #542 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2000 | 59–18 | 76.6% | #1 | 2,012 | 2 | 10 | 2002 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #63 | 1,659 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2001 | 57–17 | 77.0% | #2 | 1,915 | 3 | 16 | 2003 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #46 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2002 | 24–14 | 63.2% | #37 | 1,874 | 3 | 17 | 2004 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #33 | 1,790 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2003 | 40–19 | 67.8% | #16 | 1,854 | 3 | 19 | 2005 | 45–26 | 63.4% | #20 | 1,840 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2004 | 23–12 | 65.7% | #40 | 1,834 | 3 | 20 | 2006 | 30–15 | 66.7% | #19 | 1,865 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2005 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #291 | 1,714 | 3 | 20 | 2007 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #30 | 1,863 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1078 | 1,689 | 3 | 20 | 2008 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #27 | 1,837 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2007 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #680 | 1,601 | 3 | 20 | 2009 | 44–19 | 69.8% | #12 | 2,010 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 2008 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #1150 | 1,560 | 3 | 20 | 2010 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #62 | 1,872 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #28 | 1,880 | 0 | 5 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #31 | 1,930 | 0 | 5 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #44 | 1,828 | 0 | 5 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #68 | 1,801 | 0 | 5 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #197 | 1,766 | 0 | 5 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #107 | 1,866 | 0 | 5 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #354 | 1,900 | 0 | 5 |