H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Gustavo Kuerten vs Tim Henman H2H: 3-5

Tim Henman holds a 5–3 lead over Gustavo Kuerten in their ATP head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, they are tied 3–3 on hard courts, while Tim Henman leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Tim Henman won the 2005 Rome Masters second round 6-3 6-3.

BRA Age 49 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
3 5
8 main draw meetings
GBR Age 51 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 4, 2005* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Tim Henman #6 6-3 6-3 Gustavo Kuerten #110 Match data
Jul 29, 2004* Canada Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Gustavo Kuerten #23 7-5 6-4 Tim Henman #5 Match data
Nov 1, 2003* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R16 Carpet Tim Henman #31 6-4 6-2 Gustavo Kuerten #17 Match data
Aug 7, 2002* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Tim Henman #4 6-3 6-4 Gustavo Kuerten #19 Match data
Aug 13, 2001 Indianapolis ATP 250 QF Hard Gustavo Kuerten #1 3-6 6-1 7-5 Tim Henman #9 Match data
Aug 12, 2001* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 SF Hard Gustavo Kuerten #1 6-2 1-6 7-6(4) Tim Henman #8 Match data
Aug 13, 2000* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 SF Hard Tim Henman #16 6-7(11) 6-3 7-6(0) Gustavo Kuerten #4 Match data
Mar 22, 1998* Miami Masters Masters 1000 QF Hard Tim Henman #20 6-2 6-4 Gustavo Kuerten #11 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Gustavo Kuerten #1,132 #1 4,750 2,140 336 182 64.9% 3 5 1 0 11 20
Tim Henman #615 #4 2,826 2,027 468 260 64.3% 0 1 0 0 10 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Gustavo Kuerten Tim Henman
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1996 8–10 44.4% #88 1,556 0 0 1994 3–5 37.5% #167 1,513 0 0
20 1997 34–23 59.6% #14 1,779 1 1 1995 7–7 50.0% #95 1,584 0 0
21 1998 39–24 61.9% #23 1,781 1 3 1996 37–24 60.7% #29 1,821 0 0
22 1999 47–24 66.2% #5 1,860 1 5 1997 47–23 67.1% #17 1,895 0 2
23 2000 59–18 76.6% #1 2,012 2 10 1998 55–29 65.5% #7 1,960 0 4
24 2001 57–17 77.0% #2 1,915 3 16 1999 41–25 62.1% #12 1,785 0 4
25 2002 24–14 63.2% #37 1,874 3 17 2000 55–23 70.5% #10 1,953 0 6
26 2003 40–19 67.8% #16 1,854 3 19 2001 49–20 71.0% #9 1,924 0 8
27 2004 23–12 65.7% #40 1,834 3 20 2002 45–18 71.4% #8 1,867 0 9
28 2005 3–9 25.0% #291 1,714 3 20 2003 30–16 65.2% #15 1,970 0 11
29 2006 0–1 0.0% #1078 1,689 3 20 2004 41–20 67.2% #6 1,926 0 11
30 2007 2–7 22.2% #680 1,601 3 20 2005 23–18 56.1% #36 1,746 0 11
31 2008 0–4 0.0% #1150 1,560 3 20 2006 31–20 60.8% #39 1,868 0 11
32 2007 4–12 25.0% #292 1,684 0 11