H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:16 UTC
Gustavo Kuerten vs Todd Woodbridge H2H: 3-0
Gustavo Kuerten holds a 3–0 lead over Todd Woodbridge in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Gustavo Kuerten leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Gustavo Kuerten won the 2000 Indianapolis third round 5-7 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BRA
Age 49
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 55
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 14, 2000 | Indianapolis | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Gustavo Kuerten | 5-7 6-4 6-1 | Todd Woodbridge | Match data |
| Jan 15, 1999* | Sydney | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Gustavo Kuerten | 6-4 6-0 | Todd Woodbridge | Match data |
| Aug 7, 1997* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Gustavo Kuerten | 3-6 6-1 6-4 | Todd Woodbridge | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gustavo Kuerten | #1,132 | #1 | 4,750 | 2,140 | 336 | 182 | 64.9% | 3 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 11 | 20 |
| Todd Woodbridge | #1,151 | #19 | 1,575 | 1,857 | 237 | 229 | 50.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Gustavo Kuerten | Todd Woodbridge | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #213 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #131 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1996 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #88 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #50 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1997 | 34–23 | 59.6% | #14 | 1,779 | 1 | 1 | 1991 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #77 | 1,702 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1998 | 39–24 | 61.9% | #23 | 1,781 | 1 | 3 | 1992 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #54 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1999 | 47–24 | 66.2% | #5 | 1,860 | 1 | 5 | 1993 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #109 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2000 | 59–18 | 76.6% | #1 | 2,012 | 2 | 10 | 1994 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #90 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2001 | 57–17 | 77.0% | #2 | 1,915 | 3 | 16 | 1995 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #33 | 1,810 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2002 | 24–14 | 63.2% | #37 | 1,874 | 3 | 17 | 1996 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #36 | 1,744 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2003 | 40–19 | 67.8% | #16 | 1,854 | 3 | 19 | 1997 | 31–20 | 60.8% | #26 | 1,796 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2004 | 23–12 | 65.7% | #40 | 1,834 | 3 | 20 | 1998 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #65 | 1,714 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2005 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #291 | 1,714 | 3 | 20 | 1999 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #197 | 1,601 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1078 | 1,689 | 3 | 20 | 2000 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #187 | 1,588 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2007 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #680 | 1,601 | 3 | 20 | 2001 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #207 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2008 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #1150 | 1,560 | 3 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |