H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Gustavo Kuerten vs Tommy Haas H2H: 5-1

Gustavo Kuerten holds a 5–1 lead over Tommy Haas in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Gustavo Kuerten leads 3–1 on hard courts and 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Gustavo Kuerten won the 2001 Cincinnati Masters third round 7-6(4) 7-6(8).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Gustavo Kuerten
BRA Age 49 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
5 – 1
6 main draw meetings
Tommy Haas
GER Age 48 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 9, 2001* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Gustavo Kuerten #1 7-6(4) 7-6(8) Tommy Haas #16 Match data
Jul 28, 2001* Los Angeles ATP 250 QF Hard Gustavo Kuerten #1 6-3 6-3 Tommy Haas #22 Match data
Apr 21, 2001* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R16 Clay Gustavo Kuerten #2 6-7(6) 6-3 6-3 Tommy Haas #23 Match data
Mar 16, 2000* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Tommy Haas #22 7-6(4) 7-6(1) Gustavo Kuerten #6 Match data
Aug 14, 1999* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Gustavo Kuerten #6 7-5 7-5 Tommy Haas #15 Match data
May 16, 1998* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R16 Clay Gustavo Kuerten #9 6-4 6-2 Tommy Haas #45 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Gustavo Kuerten #1,132 #1 4,750 2,140 336 182 64.9% 3 5 1 0 11 20
Tommy Haas #616 #2 3,030 2,103 533 330 61.8% 0 1 0 3 11 15

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Gustavo Kuerten Tommy Haas
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1996 4–3 57.1% #170 1,587 0 0
19 1996 8–10 44.4% #88 1,556 0 0 1997 22–17 56.4% #45 1,721 0 0
20 1997 34–23 59.6% #14 1,779 1 1 1998 34–26 56.7% #34 1,840 0 0
21 1998 39–24 61.9% #23 1,781 1 3 1999 45–23 66.2% #11 1,859 0 1
22 1999 47–24 66.2% #5 1,860 1 5 2000 27–20 57.4% #23 1,777 0 1
23 2000 59–18 76.6% #1 2,012 2 10 2001 53–21 71.6% #8 2,009 0 5
24 2001 57–17 77.0% #2 1,915 3 16 2002 43–22 66.2% #11 1,849 0 5
25 2002 24–14 63.2% #37 1,874 3 17 — — — — — — —
26 2003 40–19 67.8% #16 1,854 3 19 2004 35–18 66.0% #17 1,909 0 7
27 2004 23–12 65.7% #40 1,834 3 20 2005 28–21 57.1% #45 1,766 0 7
28 2005 3–9 25.0% #291 1,714 3 20 2006 48–19 71.6% #11 1,893 0 10
29 2006 0–1 0.0% #1078 1,689 3 20 2007 36–17 67.9% #12 1,892 0 11
30 2007 2–7 22.2% #680 1,601 3 20 2008 18–15 54.5% #82 1,855 0 11
31 2008 0–4 0.0% #1150 1,560 3 20 2009 31–18 63.3% #18 1,913 0 12
32 — — — — — — — 2010 3–4 42.9% #372 1,844 0 12
33 — — — — — — — 2011 7–12 36.8% #205 1,762 0 12
34 — — — — — — — 2012 31–17 64.6% #21 1,966 0 13
35 — — — — — — — 2013 46–23 66.7% #12 2,011 0 15
36 — — — — — — — 2014 14–11 56.0% #77 1,904 0 15
37 — — — — — — — 2015 2–9 18.2% #470 1,784 0 15
39 — — — — — — — 2017 6–14 30.0% #252 1,686 0 15