H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Gustavo Kuerten vs Vincent Spadea H2H: 6-1

Gustavo Kuerten holds a 6–1 lead over Vincent Spadea in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Gustavo Kuerten leads 4–0 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Gustavo Kuerten won the 2004 Auckland quarterfinal 6-2 7-6(4).

BRA Age 49 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
6 1
7 main draw meetings
USA Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 17, 2004* Auckland ATP 250 QF Hard Gustavo Kuerten #19 6-2 7-6(4) Vincent Spadea #29 Match data
Oct 25, 2003* St. Petersburg ATP 250 QF Hard Gustavo Kuerten #20 6-4 7-6(4) Vincent Spadea #29 Match data
Oct 5, 2000* Hong Kong ATP 250 R32 Hard Gustavo Kuerten #3 7-5 4-6 7-5 Vincent Spadea #159 Match data
Jul 9, 1999* Gstaad ATP 250 R16 Clay Vincent Spadea #29 6-2 2-6 7-6(6) Gustavo Kuerten #5 Match data
Apr 25, 1999* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 QF Clay Gustavo Kuerten #19 6-3 6-3 Vincent Spadea #33 Match data
Aug 9, 1997* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Gustavo Kuerten #10 6-7(5) 6-3 6-4 Vincent Spadea #95 Match data
Oct 11, 1996* Beijing ATP 250 R16 Carpet Gustavo Kuerten #105 1-6 7-6(1) 6-4 Vincent Spadea #63 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Gustavo Kuerten #1,132 #1 4,750 2,140 336 182 64.9% 3 5 1 0 11 20
Vincent Spadea #1,474 #18 1,629 1,876 310 348 47.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Gustavo Kuerten Vincent Spadea
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1996 8–10 44.4% #88 1,556 0 0 1993 1–5 16.7% #303 1,483 0 0
1997 34–23 59.6% #14 1,779 1 1 1994 11–13 45.8% #75 1,561 0 0
1998 39–24 61.9% #23 1,781 1 3 1995 21–28 42.9% #81 1,639 0 0
1999 47–24 66.2% #5 1,860 1 5 1996 27–22 55.1% #54 1,711 0 0
2000 59–18 76.6% #1 2,012 2 10 1997 20–26 43.5% #88 1,695 0 0
2001 57–17 77.0% #2 1,915 3 16 1998 28–27 50.9% #42 1,752 0 0
2002 24–14 63.2% #37 1,874 3 17 1999 33–27 55.0% #20 1,763 0 0
2003 40–19 67.8% #16 1,854 3 19 2000 3–23 11.5% #213 1,545 0 0
2004 23–12 65.7% #40 1,834 3 20 2001 1–3 25.0% #125 1,534 0 0
2005 3–9 25.0% #291 1,714 3 20 2002 13–17 43.3% #67 1,623 0 0
2006 0–1 0.0% #1078 1,689 3 20 2003 34–25 57.6% #29 1,723 0 0
2007 2–7 22.2% #680 1,601 3 20 2004 39–25 60.9% #20 1,784 0 1
2008 0–4 0.0% #1150 1,560 3 20 2005 21–24 46.7% #75 1,665 0 1
2006 19–26 42.2% #73 1,627 0 1
2007 24–28 46.2% #77 1,650 0 1
2008 13–19 40.6% #76 1,657 0 1
2009 2–9 18.2% #295 1,526 0 1
2010 0–1 0.0% #1517 1,480 0 1