H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Gustavo Kuerten vs Younes El Aynaoui H2H: 4-1 (incl. walkovers)

Gustavo Kuerten vs Younes El Aynaoui: 2–1 excluding walkovers; 4–1 including 2 walkovers. Across 5 main-draw results including walkovers, Gustavo Kuerten leads 3–0 on clay and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Younes El Aynaoui won the 2003 Long Island quarterfinal 7-6(4) 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Gustavo Kuerten
BRA Age 50 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H including walkovers
4 – 1
5 main-draw results
Younes El Aynaoui
MAR Age 55 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Younes El Aynaoui #22 7-6(4) 6-4 Gustavo Kuerten #14 Match data Aug 23, 2003* QF Long Island ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Gustavo Kuerten #15 (w/o) Younes El Aynaoui #18 Match data Apr 25, 2003* R16 Barcelona Open ATP International Series Gold → modern equivalent ATP 500 Clay
Gustavo Kuerten #40 6-7(3) 6-2 6-4 Younes El Aynaoui #18 Match data Oct 10, 2002* R32 Montpellier Open ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Carpet
Gustavo Kuerten #2 6-4 4-6 6-4 Younes El Aynaoui #51 Match data Apr 18, 2001* R64 Monte-Carlo Masters Masters 1000 Clay
Gustavo Kuerten #6 (w/o) Younes El Aynaoui #16 Match data May 13, 2000* R16 Italian Open Masters 1000 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Gustavo Kuerten #1,132 #1 4,750 2,137 339 184 64.8% 3 5 1 4 7 20
Younes El Aynaoui #1,592 #14 1,635 1,923 244 221 52.5% 0 0 0 0 5 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Gustavo Kuerten Younes El Aynaoui
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1990 0–1 0.0% #351 1,491 0 0
19 1996 8–10 44.4% #88 1,556 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1997 34–23 59.6% #14 1,780 1 1 1992 3–2 60.0% #311 1,532 0 0
21 1998 39–24 61.9% #23 1,781 1 3 1993 16–14 53.3% #51 1,636 0 0
22 1999 47–24 66.2% #5 1,861 1 5 1994 15–27 35.7% #117 1,516 0 0
23 2000 62–19 76.5% #1 2,002 2 10 1995 4–5 44.4% #110 1,562 0 0
24 2001 57–17 77.0% #2 1,912 3 16 1996 15–22 40.5% #70 1,568 0 0
25 2002 24–14 63.2% #37 1,872 3 17 1997 2–2 50.0% #237 1,581 0 0
26 2003 40–19 67.8% #16 1,851 3 19 1998 5–2 71.4% #45 1,663 0 0
27 2004 23–13 63.9% #40 1,812 3 20 1999 27–23 54.0% #33 1,720 0 1
28 2005 3–9 25.0% #291 1,702 3 20 2000 36–26 58.1% #25 1,717 0 1
29 2006 0–1 0.0% #1078 1,678 3 20 2001 31–23 57.4% #38 1,823 0 2
30 2007 2–7 22.2% #680 1,594 3 20 2002 42–25 62.7% #22 1,773 0 5
31 2008 0–4 0.0% #1150 1,553 3 20 2003 38–26 59.4% #14 1,835 0 5
32 — — — — — — — 2004 0–5 0.0% #644 1,730 0 5
33 — — — — — — — 2005 1–10 9.1% #228 1,592 0 5
34 — — — — — — — 2006 2–2 50.0% #189 1,607 0 5
35 — — — — — — — 2007 1–3 25.0% #167 1,615 0 5
36 — — — — — — — 2008 5–2 71.4% #201 1,698 0 5
38 — — — — — — — 2010 1–1 50.0% #720 1,689 0 5

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Gustavo Kuerten Younes El Aynaoui
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 1996 1 1 2 50.0% 5 7 12 41.7% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1997 17 8 25 68.0% 14 8 22 63.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1992 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — —
21 1998 15 11 26 57.7% 24 11 35 68.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1993 3 5 8 37.5% 13 7 20 65.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
22 1999 20 15 35 57.1% 21 6 27 77.8% 4 1 5 80.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1994 7 7 14 50.0% 8 17 25 32.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 2000 28 12 40 70.0% 27 4 31 87.1% 2 1 3 66.7% 5 2 7 71.4% 1995 1 3 4 25.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — —
24 2001 23 12 35 65.7% 33 2 35 94.3% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 1996 9 10 19 47.4% 5 10 15 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
25 2002 10 6 16 62.5% 10 6 16 62.5% — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% 1997 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — —
26 2003 23 10 33 69.7% 14 7 21 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1998 — — — — 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — —
27 2004 8 8 16 50.0% 15 5 20 75.0% — — — — — — — — 1999 4 6 10 40.0% 21 14 35 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
28 2005 1 1 2 50.0% 2 8 10 20.0% — — — — — — — — 2000 15 12 27 55.6% 18 11 29 62.1% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3%
29 2006 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2001 5 9 14 35.7% 20 12 32 62.5% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 1 5 80.0%
30 2007 1 4 5 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — 2002 18 12 30 60.0% 22 7 29 75.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
31 2008 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2003 23 12 35 65.7% 10 9 19 52.6% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 2 2 0.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1 6 7 14.3% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 — — — — 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — —
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 147 89 236 62.3% 166 71 237 70.0% 7 7 14 50.0% 19 17 36 52.8% — 90 93 183 49.2% 135 102 237 57.0% 10 10 20 50.0% 9 16 25 36.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 449/523 of Gustavo Kuerten's and 88/97 of Younes El Aynaoui's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Gustavo Kuerten Younes El Aynaoui
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 1996 17/18 3.4 2.6 53.7% 70.2% 49.5% 47.3% 34.6% 60.9% 35.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 1997 50/57 8.1 3.1 53.4% 74.6% 50.1% 58.7% 40.0% 63.2% 38.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 1998 53/63 7.7 2.8 54.7% 75.4% 50.3% 60.2% 47.3% 64.0% 37.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 1999 60/71 8.5 2.2 53.6% 78.5% 51.8% 63.8% 49.4% 66.1% 39.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2000 59/81 9.6 2.3 54.2% 78.9% 54.4% 61.4% 40.8% 67.7% 39.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2001 63/74 9.2 2.1 55.5% 79.3% 56.6% 71.1% 41.5% 69.1% 39.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2002 31/38 8.8 1.8 55.6% 75.5% 54.0% 61.6% 45.6% 66.0% 36.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2003 57/59 8.4 2.0 55.6% 76.4% 52.5% 59.4% 41.1% 65.8% 38.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2004 35/36 8.2 2.8 55.4% 74.4% 50.9% 52.6% 50.3% 63.9% 38.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2005 12/12 6.1 3.3 53.0% 66.7% 42.5% 55.7% 34.5% 55.0% 34.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2006 1/1 8.0 3.0 53.2% 76.2% 54.1% 33.3% 16.7% 65.8% 33.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2007 7/9 7.3 2.0 59.7% 75.7% 44.2% 46.4% 33.7% 64.1% 35.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2008 4/4 3.5 2.8 53.8% 66.9% 38.6% 47.0% 27.8% 53.8% 21.9% 2003 58/64 10.7 2.9 65.7% 75.4% 50.8% 67.6% 41.2% 66.9% 35.2%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 4/5 1.0 3.3 64.2% 48.9% 32.0% 46.9% 0.0% 42.4% 21.1%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 11/11 2.4 3.5 61.8% 60.7% 40.1% 48.9% 25.2% 52.9% 31.7%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 3/4 5.7 2.0 56.4% 78.3% 53.6% 57.8% 33.0% 67.0% 39.6%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 4/4 5.0 1.8 67.9% 69.5% 44.5% 53.4% 35.1% 62.0% 30.9%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 6/7 9.5 2.7 64.0% 77.9% 48.6% 64.3% 58.3% 67.4% 36.7%
38 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 2/2 8.0 3.0 59.3% 78.4% 40.6% 58.3% 12.5% 62.9% 30.8%
Career — 449/523 8.3 2.4 54.7% 76.3% 52.0% 60.6% 43.2% 65.3% 38.2% — 88/465 8.6 2.9 64.7% 72.4% 48.0% 62.9% 37.3% 63.8% 34.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Gustavo Kuerten Younes El Aynaoui
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1492 103.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — 0–1 — -0.05
19 1996 1557 123.0 +0.44 -1.62 0.915 48.0% -4 +17 — 39.5% -0.72 5–1 (83%) 3–4 (43%) 106.9 +0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1997 1780 149.1 +1.98 +0.21 1.038 50.3% -39 +59 — 56.5% +0.42 15–7 (68%) 12–17 (41%) 105.3 -0.79 1992 1532 116.8 — — — — — +42 — 60.0% +0.47 2–1 (67%) — — +0.45
21 1998 1781 146.0 +2.64 -0.29 1.039 51.0% -43 +127 — 57.6% +0.52 13–8 (62%) 14–12 (54%) 103.2 +1.23 1993 1637 136.8 — — — — -93 +76 — 51.4% +0.19 8–6 (57%) 6–8 (43%) 100.3 +0.77
22 1999 1861 155.1 +4.10 +2.03 1.159 52.5% -64 +127 -209 65.9% +0.88 7–11 (39%) 8–12 (40%) 94.2 -0.75 1994 1517 125.5 — — — — +44 +45 — 37.8% -0.75 3–9 (25%) 7–9 (44%) 94.7 +1.14
23 2000 2003 158.1 +5.05 +3.02 1.228 53.2% -43 +160 -329 69.6% +1.16 16–7 (70%) 26–21 (55%) 104.6 -0.10 1995 1562 110.8 — — — — -30 +67 — 48.0% -0.32 1–0 2–1 (67%) — +1.06
24 2001 1913 159.6 +6.12 +3.01 1.293 54.1% -75 +370 — 70.2% +1.27 17–11 (61%) 18–16 (53%) 95.3 +0.65 1996 1569 135.0 — — — — +36 +10 — 46.3% -0.22 6–6 (50%) 6–9 (40%) 103.7 -0.66
25 2002 1873 141.6 +3.17 -0.14 1.081 51.3% -18 +227 — 61.0% +0.66 7–8 (47%) 12–12 (50%) 92.4 +0.15 1997 1582 114.0 — — — — — +36 — 50.0% -0.25 — 2–0 — +0.10
26 2003 1852 149.1 +3.43 +1.34 1.127 52.1% +22 +153 — 61.5% +0.83 11–7 (61%) 19–14 (58%) 99.8 +0.95 1998 1664 129.0 — — — — — +55 — 69.2% +0.69 0–1 1–0 — -0.43
27 2004 1813 142.0 +1.63 +1.04 1.065 51.1% -37 +187 — 58.8% +0.51 10–3 (77%) 9–7 (56%) 101.1 +0.10 1999 1721 149.4 — — — — -67 +83 — 56.9% +0.53 5–10 (33%) 11–10 (52%) 97.9 -2.15
28 2005 1703 118.6 -2.63 -2.14 0.761 45.0% — +122 — 32.1% -1.36 — 1–2 (33%) — -1.09 2000 1717 137.4 — — — — -35 +105 -161 57.7% +0.27 11–11 (50%) 22–12 (65%) 103.5 +1.57
29 2006 1678 99.4 -0.70 -0.57 0.965 48.2% — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 — — +0.12 2001 1823 138.8 — — — — -113 +14 -234 55.9% +0.32 10–8 (56%) 19–13 (59%) 105.8 -0.38
30 2007 1594 112.2 -0.10 -1.70 0.979 49.6% +102 +144 — 26.3% -1.16 0–1 0–3 (0%) — +0.13 2002 1774 143.3 — — — — -28 +122 — 57.1% +0.34 16–10 (62%) 16–13 (55%) 102.1 -0.43
31 2008 1553 104.1 -3.30 -4.26 0.474 39.4% — +130 — 0.0% -3.56 — — — -0.18 2003 1835 143.2 +4.34 -1.40 1.064 51.1% +15 -32 -219 59.6% +0.49 12–10 (55%) 25–19 (57%) 101.2 +1.73
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1731 108.3 -5.09 -3.78 0.366 33.4% +8 — — 0.0% -4.17 — — — -0.47
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1592 108.9 -4.60 -4.26 0.672 42.5% +43 +145 — 16.0% -2.44 0–2 1–3 (25%) — +0.39
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1608 110.3 +0.93 +2.53 1.201 52.2% +26 — — 66.7% +0.50 — 0–1 — -0.20
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1615 121.2 -0.65 +0.01 0.814 46.6% +66 — — 33.3% -1.22 0–1 3–0 (100%) — -0.31
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1699 118.9 +2.44 +0.53 1.125 52.9% — +102 — 73.3% +1.20 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — +0.21
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1689 101.0 -1.64 -2.05 0.830 46.2% — — — 50.0% -1.50 — 2–0 — +0.37
Career — 2138 154.8 +3.30 +1.14 1.102 51.6% -36 +170 -254 61.0% +0.68 101–65 (61%) 122–120 (50%) 98.7 +0.12 — 1923 143.4 +2.19 -1.55 0.940 49.1% -17 +62 -210 53.2% +0.12 76–76 (50%) 124–100 (55%) 104.2 +0.59

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.