H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Guy Forget vs David Pate H2H: 1-2

David Pate holds a 2–1 lead over Guy Forget in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, David Pate leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, David Pate won the 1990 Montpellier Open round of 32 7-6 4-6 7-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Guy Forget
FRA Age 61 Left-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main draw meetings
David Pate
USA Age 64 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
David Pate #105 7-6 4-6 7-6 Guy Forget #15 Match data Oct 18, 1990* R32 Montpellier Open ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Carpet
David Pate #126 6-1 6-3 Guy Forget #21 Match data Jun 15, 1990* R16 Queen's Club Championships ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Grass
Guy Forget #81 6-2 7-6 David Pate #159 Match data Mar 7, 1990* R64 Indian Wells Open Masters 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Guy Forget #1,367 #4 2,392 2,039 359 281 56.1% 0 2 0 1 8 11
David Pate #911 #18 441 1,875 181 168 51.9% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Guy Forget David Pate
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1982 16–13 55.2% #70 1,660 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1983 7–23 23.3% #94 1,499 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1984 17–12 58.6% #36 1,715 0 0 1981 0–1 0.0% — 1,493 0 0
20 1985 18–21 46.2% #61 1,723 0 0 1982 2–5 28.6% — 1,484 0 0
21 1986 32–23 58.2% #25 1,791 0 1 1983 5–7 41.7% #203 1,529 0 0
22 1987 20–20 50.0% #54 1,750 0 1 1984 21–13 61.8% #30 1,743 0 1
23 1988 23–18 56.1% #48 1,780 0 1 1985 31–24 56.4% #26 1,742 0 1
24 1989 15–10 60.0% #36 1,803 0 2 1986 35–23 60.3% #30 1,788 0 1
25 1990 38–23 62.3% #16 1,800 0 3 1987 28–18 60.9% #18 1,750 0 2
26 1991 57–19 75.0% #7 1,984 0 9 1988 20–16 55.6% #47 1,715 0 2
27 1992 43–22 66.2% #11 1,974 0 10 1989 9–19 32.1% #157 1,656 0 2
28 1993 8–8 50.0% #158 1,858 0 10 1990 16–15 51.6% #94 1,657 0 2
29 1994 22–17 56.4% #40 1,842 0 10 1991 11–18 37.9% #160 1,596 0 2
30 1995 19–24 44.2% #71 1,695 0 10 1992 1–4 20.0% #396 1,573 0 2
31 1996 24–23 51.1% #51 1,682 0 11 1993 1–3 25.0% #514 1,548 0 2
32 1997 0–5 0.0% #1121 1,593 0 11 1994 1–1 50.0% #624 1,561 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 1995 0–1 0.0% #911 1,542 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Guy Forget David Pate
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1982 6 4 10 60.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1983 1 4 5 20.0% 4 14 18 22.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1984 3 2 5 60.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 1981 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1985 6 7 13 46.2% 9 8 17 52.9% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 1982 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
21 1986 14 7 21 66.7% 8 7 15 53.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 8 7 15 53.3% 1983 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
22 1987 8 8 16 50.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 4 7 42.9% 1984 18 6 24 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 1988 8 6 14 57.1% 8 6 14 57.1% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 4 7 42.9% 1985 15 11 26 57.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 7 4 11 63.6% 7 8 15 46.7%
24 1989 6 4 10 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 7 4 11 63.6% 1986 20 11 31 64.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 11 8 19 57.9%
25 1990 10 8 18 55.6% 20 6 26 76.9% 4 2 6 66.7% 4 7 11 36.4% 1987 18 10 28 64.3% — — — — 5 3 8 62.5% 5 5 10 50.0%
26 1991 31 5 36 86.1% 6 6 12 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 16 6 22 72.7% 1988 16 11 27 59.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
27 1992 15 6 21 71.4% 7 6 13 53.8% 4 2 6 66.7% 17 8 25 68.0% 1989 6 14 20 30.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
28 1993 6 4 10 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 1990 7 10 17 41.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 3 2 5 60.0%
29 1994 9 6 15 60.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 4 7 42.9% 1991 6 10 16 37.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1%
30 1995 5 9 14 35.7% 3 6 9 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 5 6 11 45.5% 1992 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 1996 14 10 24 58.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 1993 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
32 1997 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1994 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 142 94 236 60.2% 91 87 178 51.1% 44 32 76 57.9% 82 68 150 54.7% — 113 98 211 53.6% 5 13 18 27.8% 31 26 57 54.4% 32 31 63 50.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Guy Forget David Pate
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1982 1661 139.7 — — — — +12 -31 -111 54.2% -0.04 5–2 (71%) 10–2 (83%) — +1.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1983 1500 125.6 — — — — +128 +22 — 30.4% -1.44 2–5 (29%) 2–4 (33%) — -0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1984 1716 139.3 — — — — -18 -145 -46 59.0% +0.73 4–5 (44%) 6–6 (50%) — -0.09 1981 1494 104.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -1.00 — 0–2 — -0.08
20 1985 1724 139.6 — — — — -14 -61 -96 46.5% +0.07 8–7 (53%) 5–12 (29%) — -2.32 1982 1485 108.5 — — — — +40 — — 31.6% -1.00 1–0 1–0 — +0.29
21 1986 1792 143.7 — — — — -16 -50 -161 56.4% +0.41 9–10 (47%) 7–11 (39%) — +0.51 1983 1529 119.4 — — — — +10 — +62 37.9% -0.24 2–1 (67%) 2–8 (20%) — +0.28
22 1987 1751 135.0 — — — — -8 -67 -30 46.8% -0.16 10–6 (63%) 9–8 (53%) — -0.70 1984 1744 140.4 — — — — +36 -218 -186 59.5% +0.43 3–5 (38%) 4–4 (50%) — +0.33
23 1988 1780 146.8 — — — — -33 -58 -15 58.7% +0.63 3–8 (27%) 8–7 (53%) — -2.19 1985 1743 138.8 — — — — +29 -206 -84 52.4% +0.13 17–9 (65%) 15–13 (54%) — +0.85
24 1989 1803 145.1 — — — — -10 -80 — 58.3% +0.35 2–3 (40%) 5–5 (50%) — -0.73 1986 1788 146.3 — — — — +34 — -115 58.3% +0.59 8–7 (53%) 9–9 (50%) — +0.85
25 1990 1801 147.0 — — — — -87 +114 +2 57.8% +0.53 14–7 (67%) 14–16 (47%) — -0.59 1987 1751 141.1 — — — — +30 — -55 61.5% +0.54 6–11 (35%) 18–11 (62%) — -0.04
26 1991 1984 162.9 +7.16 +2.41 1.308 54.4% +28 -124 -103 66.7% +1.05 14–5 (74%) 19–18 (51%) — -1.17 1988 1716 139.3 — — — — +41 — -25 52.7% +0.32 7–5 (58%) 7–11 (39%) — -1.56
27 1992 1975 161.1 +6.36 -1.13 1.145 52.1% +35 -179 -45 59.7% +0.60 15–9 (63%) 25–17 (60%) — -3.46 1989 1656 135.9 — — — — +19 — +63 35.5% -1.12 5–5 (50%) 5–8 (38%) — -2.42
28 1993 1859 136.1 +3.64 -0.27 1.131 51.4% +77 -107 — 55.3% +0.40 0–1 2–4 (33%) — +0.39 1990 1658 127.8 — — — — -22 — +129 50.6% +0.33 6–5 (55%) 7–8 (47%) — +0.85
29 1994 1842 150.9 +4.02 -1.25 1.030 50.7% +28 -35 +113 53.5% +0.23 8–5 (62%) 9–10 (47%) — -3.76 1991 1596 133.2 — — — — +31 -112 +179 40.3% -0.61 5–6 (45%) 3–7 (30%) — -0.86
30 1995 1696 144.9 +4.28 -2.23 1.017 50.3% +25 +49 +218 47.7% +0.07 5–7 (42%) 10–14 (42%) — -2.42 1992 1574 104.4 — — — — +24 — — 28.6% -1.57 1–1 2–1 (67%) — -0.43
31 1996 1683 141.7 +4.22 -1.32 1.080 51.2% +23 +30 +203 50.8% +0.13 7–10 (41%) 14–16 (47%) — -0.56 1993 1548 104.3 — — — — +35 — — 33.3% -0.78 0–1 0–2 — +0.22
32 1997 1593 98.0 -0.19 -2.19 0.829 46.3% +2 — — 18.2% -1.64 0–1 0–1 — +0.38 1994 1561 100.6 — — — — — — — 40.0% -2.20 1–0 — — -0.12
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1542 99.0 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.14
Career — 2039 153.9 +5.33 -0.41 1.130 51.9% +9 -32 +4 54.6% +0.33 106–91 (54%) 145–151 (49%) 101.1 -2.43 — 1875 143.1 — — — — +27 -183 -21 50.8% +0.06 62–57 (52%) 73–84 (46%) 98.7 -0.49

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.