H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Guy Forget vs Henri Leconte H2H: 3-1
Guy Forget holds a 3–1 lead over Henri Leconte in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Guy Forget leads 2–0 on grass, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Guy Forget won the 1992 Wimbledon third round 7-6(4) 6-3 3-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 61
Left-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 63
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 28, 1992* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R32 | Grass | Guy Forget | 7-6(4) 6-3 3-6 6-3 | Henri Leconte | Match data |
| Jan 15, 1992* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Guy Forget | 2-6 6-4 6-7(5) 6-4 6-3 | Henri Leconte | Match data |
| Jun 30, 1991* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R32 | Grass | Guy Forget | 3-6 4-6 6-1 4-1 (ret.) | Henri Leconte | Match data |
| Aug 31, 1985* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Henri Leconte | 6-4 6-4 6-4 | Guy Forget | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guy Forget | #1,367 | #4 | 2,392 | 2,038 | 356 | 279 | 56.1% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 11 |
| Henri Leconte | #1,355 | #5 | 948 | 2,064 | 344 | 242 | 58.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 9 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Guy Forget | Henri Leconte | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #440 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1982 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #70 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #440 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1983 | 7–23 | 23.3% | #94 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #29 | 1,865 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1984 | 17–12 | 58.6% | #36 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 35–23 | 60.3% | #30 | 1,828 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1985 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #61 | 1,723 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 26–18 | 59.1% | #27 | 1,866 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1986 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #25 | 1,791 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 44–21 | 67.7% | #16 | 1,932 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 1987 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #54 | 1,750 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 38–14 | 73.1% | #6 | 1,972 | 0 | 6 |
| 23 | 1988 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #48 | 1,769 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 23–16 | 59.0% | #21 | 1,843 | 0 | 6 |
| 24 | 1989 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #36 | 1,798 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 47–19 | 71.2% | #9 | 1,936 | 0 | 8 |
| 25 | 1990 | 38–23 | 62.3% | #16 | 1,799 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #115 | 1,798 | 0 | 8 |
| 26 | 1991 | 57–19 | 75.0% | #7 | 1,985 | 0 | 9 | 1990 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #30 | 1,797 | 0 | 8 |
| 27 | 1992 | 42–21 | 66.7% | #11 | 1,978 | 0 | 10 | 1991 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #161 | 1,716 | 0 | 8 |
| 28 | 1993 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #158 | 1,861 | 0 | 10 | 1992 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #61 | 1,807 | 0 | 8 |
| 29 | 1994 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #40 | 1,840 | 0 | 10 | 1993 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #101 | 1,832 | 0 | 9 |
| 30 | 1995 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #71 | 1,694 | 0 | 10 | 1994 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #94 | 1,737 | 0 | 9 |
| 31 | 1996 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #51 | 1,690 | 0 | 11 | 1995 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #134 | 1,632 | 0 | 9 |
| 32 | 1997 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #1121 | 1,599 | 0 | 11 | 1996 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #1001 | 1,558 | 0 | 9 |