H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Guy Forget vs Jaime Fillol H2H: 1-0
Guy Forget holds a 1–0 lead over Jaime Fillol in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Guy Forget leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Guy Forget won the 1983 Rome second round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 61
Left-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CHI
Age 80
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 18, 1983* | Rome | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Guy Forget | 6-2 6-2 | Jaime Fillol | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guy Forget | #1,367 | #4 | 2,392 | 2,038 | 356 | 279 | 56.1% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 11 |
| Jaime Fillol | #1,171 | #14 | 8 | 2,041 | 532 | 367 | 59.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Guy Forget | Jaime Fillol | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1982 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #70 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1983 | 7–23 | 23.3% | #94 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1984 | 17–12 | 58.6% | #36 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1985 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #61 | 1,723 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1986 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #25 | 1,791 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1987 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #54 | 1,750 | 0 | 1 | 1968 | 30–10 | 75.0% | — | 1,658 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1988 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #48 | 1,769 | 0 | 1 | 1969 | 27–19 | 58.7% | — | 1,673 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1989 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #36 | 1,798 | 0 | 2 | 1970 | 32–23 | 58.2% | — | 1,749 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1990 | 38–23 | 62.3% | #16 | 1,799 | 0 | 3 | 1971 | 43–21 | 67.2% | — | 1,774 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1991 | 57–19 | 75.0% | #7 | 1,985 | 0 | 9 | 1972 | 44–32 | 57.9% | — | 1,745 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1992 | 42–21 | 66.7% | #11 | 1,978 | 0 | 10 | 1973 | 51–33 | 60.7% | #17 | 1,867 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 1993 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #158 | 1,861 | 0 | 10 | 1974 | 48–32 | 60.0% | #31 | 1,830 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 1994 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #40 | 1,840 | 0 | 10 | 1975 | 56–27 | 67.5% | #16 | 1,962 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 1995 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #71 | 1,694 | 0 | 10 | 1976 | 47–27 | 63.5% | #24 | 1,928 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | 1996 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #51 | 1,690 | 0 | 11 | 1977 | 44–21 | 67.7% | #24 | 1,894 | 0 | 5 |
| 32 | 1997 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #1121 | 1,599 | 0 | 11 | 1978 | 33–29 | 53.2% | #77 | 1,756 | 0 | 5 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 21–28 | 42.9% | #124 | 1,736 | 0 | 5 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 10–22 | 31.2% | #86 | 1,644 | 0 | 5 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #95 | 1,654 | 0 | 6 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 14–8 | 63.6% | #77 | 1,707 | 0 | 7 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #85 | 1,649 | 0 | 7 |