H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Guy Forget vs Jim Grabb H2H: 1-2
Jim Grabb holds a 2–1 lead over Guy Forget in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Jim Grabb leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Jim Grabb won the 1993 Indian Wells Masters second round 7-6(5) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 61
Left-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 62
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 3, 1993* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Jim Grabb | 7-6(5) 6-3 | Guy Forget | Match data |
| Sep 2, 1992* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Guy Forget | 6-2 6-3 7-6(5) | Jim Grabb | Match data |
| Jan 15, 1988* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Jim Grabb | 6-4 7-5 5-7 6-7 7-5 | Guy Forget | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guy Forget | #1,367 | #4 | 2,392 | 2,038 | 356 | 279 | 56.1% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 11 |
| Jim Grabb | #927 | #24 | 760 | 1,828 | 179 | 199 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Guy Forget | Jim Grabb | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1982 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #70 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1983 | 7–23 | 23.3% | #94 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1984 | 17–12 | 58.6% | #36 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1985 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #61 | 1,723 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1986 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #25 | 1,791 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #251 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1987 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #54 | 1,750 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #94 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1988 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #48 | 1,769 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #66 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1989 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #36 | 1,798 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #91 | 1,562 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1990 | 38–23 | 62.3% | #16 | 1,799 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #35 | 1,767 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1991 | 57–19 | 75.0% | #7 | 1,985 | 0 | 9 | 1990 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #72 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1992 | 42–21 | 66.7% | #11 | 1,978 | 0 | 10 | 1991 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #87 | 1,679 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1993 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #158 | 1,861 | 0 | 10 | 1992 | 31–24 | 56.4% | #55 | 1,747 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 1994 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #40 | 1,840 | 0 | 10 | 1993 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #197 | 1,690 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 1995 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #71 | 1,694 | 0 | 10 | 1994 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #68 | 1,669 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 1996 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #51 | 1,690 | 0 | 11 | 1995 | 6–17 | 26.1% | #207 | 1,544 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 1997 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #1121 | 1,599 | 0 | 11 | 1996 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #199 | 1,565 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #342 | 1,516 | 0 | 2 |