H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Guy Forget vs Jose Luis Clerc H2H: 0-1

Jose Luis Clerc holds a 1–0 lead over Guy Forget in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jose Luis Clerc leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jose Luis Clerc won the 1982 Indianapolis round of 16 6-7 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Guy Forget
FRA Age 61 Left-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Jose Luis Clerc
ARG Age 68 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jose Luis Clerc #6 6-7 6-3 6-3 Guy Forget Match data Aug 7, 1982* R16 Indianapolis ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Guy Forget #1,367 #4 2,392 2,039 359 281 56.1% 0 2 0 1 8 11
Jose Luis Clerc #1,263 #4 20 2,219 355 138 72.0% 0 0 0 1 24 25

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Guy Forget Jose Luis Clerc
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1982 16–13 55.2% #70 1,660 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1983 7–23 23.3% #94 1,499 0 0 1977 1–3 25.0% #366 1,488 0 0
19 1984 17–12 58.6% #36 1,715 0 0 1978 50–17 74.6% #15 1,862 0 3
20 1985 18–21 46.2% #61 1,723 0 0 1979 53–22 70.7% #17 1,931 0 4
21 1986 32–23 58.2% #25 1,791 0 1 1980 65–20 76.5% #8 2,016 0 10
22 1987 20–20 50.0% #54 1,750 0 1 1981 54–12 81.8% #5 2,071 0 16
23 1988 23–18 56.1% #48 1,780 0 1 1982 66–23 74.2% #6 1,957 0 21
24 1989 15–10 60.0% #36 1,803 0 2 1983 29–14 67.4% #8 1,903 0 25
25 1990 38–23 62.3% #16 1,800 0 3 1984 13–10 56.5% #33 1,827 0 25
26 1991 57–19 75.0% #7 1,984 0 9 1985 23–13 63.9% #28 1,832 0 25
27 1992 43–22 66.2% #11 1,974 0 10 — — — — — — —
28 1993 8–8 50.0% #158 1,858 0 10 — — — — — — —
29 1994 22–17 56.4% #40 1,842 0 10 — — — — — — —
30 1995 19–24 44.2% #71 1,695 0 10 1989 1–4 20.0% #514 1,738 0 25
31 1996 24–23 51.1% #51 1,682 0 11 — — — — — — —
32 1997 0–5 0.0% #1121 1,593 0 11 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Guy Forget Jose Luis Clerc
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1982 6 4 10 60.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1983 1 4 5 20.0% 4 14 18 22.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1977 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
19 1984 3 2 5 60.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 1978 2 1 3 66.7% 47 13 60 78.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
20 1985 6 7 13 46.2% 9 8 17 52.9% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 1979 15 3 18 83.3% 31 14 45 68.9% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 3 6 50.0%
21 1986 14 7 21 66.7% 8 7 15 53.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 8 7 15 53.3% 1980 8 3 11 72.7% 47 7 54 87.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 7 13 46.2%
22 1987 8 8 16 50.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 4 7 42.9% 1981 7 2 9 77.8% 44 5 49 89.8% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 4 5 20.0%
23 1988 8 6 14 57.1% 8 6 14 57.1% 4 2 6 66.7% 3 4 7 42.9% 1982 2 3 5 40.0% 57 11 68 83.8% — — — — 7 9 16 43.8%
24 1989 6 4 10 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 7 4 11 63.6% 1983 5 1 6 83.3% 24 9 33 72.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
25 1990 10 8 18 55.6% 20 6 26 76.9% 4 2 6 66.7% 4 7 11 36.4% 1984 2 2 4 50.0% 11 8 19 57.9% — — — — — — — —
26 1991 31 5 36 86.1% 6 6 12 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 16 6 22 72.7% 1985 1 2 3 33.3% 22 11 33 66.7% — — — — — — — —
27 1992 15 6 21 71.4% 7 6 13 53.8% 4 2 6 66.7% 17 8 25 68.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1993 6 4 10 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1994 9 6 15 60.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1995 5 9 14 35.7% 3 6 9 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 5 6 11 45.5% 1989 — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — —
31 1996 14 10 24 58.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1997 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 142 94 236 60.2% 91 87 178 51.1% 44 32 76 57.9% 82 68 150 54.7% — 42 18 60 70.0% 284 83 367 77.4% 11 10 21 52.4% 18 27 45 40.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Guy Forget Jose Luis Clerc
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1982 1661 139.7 — — — — +12 -31 -111 54.2% -0.04 5–2 (71%) 10–2 (83%) — +1.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1983 1500 125.6 — — — — +128 +22 — 30.4% -1.44 2–5 (29%) 2–4 (33%) — -0.01 1977 1488 104.9 — — — — +58 — — 40.0% -0.10 0–2 — — +0.53
19 1984 1716 139.3 — — — — -18 -145 -46 59.0% +0.73 4–5 (44%) 6–6 (50%) — -0.09 1978 1862 154.7 — — — — -272 +118 -369 69.4% +1.32 9–2 (82%) 5–1 (83%) — +2.11
20 1985 1724 139.6 — — — — -14 -61 -96 46.5% +0.07 8–7 (53%) 5–12 (29%) — -2.32 1979 1931 152.6 — — — — -134 +53 -305 66.3% +1.18 12–8 (60%) 12–11 (52%) — +0.45
21 1986 1792 143.7 — — — — -16 -50 -161 56.4% +0.41 9–10 (47%) 7–11 (39%) — +0.51 1980 2016 159.7 — — — — -176 +145 -322 69.7% +1.31 16–8 (67%) 9–7 (56%) — -2.07
22 1987 1751 135.0 — — — — -8 -67 -30 46.8% -0.16 10–6 (63%) 9–8 (53%) — -0.70 1981 2071 165.6 — — — — -211 +222 -366 73.3% +1.59 13–4 (76%) 11–8 (58%) — -2.26
23 1988 1780 146.8 — — — — -33 -58 -15 58.7% +0.63 3–8 (27%) 8–7 (53%) — -2.19 1982 1957 162.1 — — — — -187 +262 — 68.8% +1.41 17–9 (65%) 12–7 (63%) — -1.60
24 1989 1803 145.1 — — — — -10 -80 — 58.3% +0.35 2–3 (40%) 5–5 (50%) — -0.73 1983 1904 155.8 — — — — -155 +213 — 65.6% +1.19 4–3 (57%) 2–3 (40%) — -0.11
25 1990 1801 147.0 — — — — -87 +114 +2 57.8% +0.53 14–7 (67%) 14–16 (47%) — -0.59 1984 1828 140.7 — — — — -86 +138 — 58.8% +0.76 0–2 3–3 (50%) — -0.10
26 1991 1984 162.9 +7.16 +2.41 1.308 54.4% +28 -124 -103 66.7% +1.05 14–5 (74%) 19–18 (51%) — -1.17 1985 1832 146.7 — — — — -119 +94 — 64.2% +0.80 3–3 (50%) 7–4 (64%) — -1.21
27 1992 1975 161.1 +6.36 -1.13 1.145 52.1% +35 -179 -45 59.7% +0.60 15–9 (63%) 25–17 (60%) — -3.46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1993 1859 136.1 +3.64 -0.27 1.131 51.4% +77 -107 — 55.3% +0.40 0–1 2–4 (33%) — +0.39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1994 1842 150.9 +4.02 -1.25 1.030 50.7% +28 -35 +113 53.5% +0.23 8–5 (62%) 9–10 (47%) — -3.76 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1995 1696 144.9 +4.28 -2.23 1.017 50.3% +25 +49 +218 47.7% +0.07 5–7 (42%) 10–14 (42%) — -2.42 1989 1739 102.4 — — — — — +88 — 30.8% -1.69 0–1 0–1 — +0.23
31 1996 1683 141.7 +4.22 -1.32 1.080 51.2% +23 +30 +203 50.8% +0.13 7–10 (41%) 14–16 (47%) — -0.56 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1997 1593 98.0 -0.19 -2.19 0.829 46.3% +2 — — 18.2% -1.64 0–1 0–1 — +0.38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2039 153.9 +5.33 -0.41 1.130 51.9% +9 -32 +4 54.6% +0.33 106–91 (54%) 145–151 (49%) 101.1 -2.43 — 2220 161.4 — — — — -162 +162 -333 67.6% +1.24 74–42 (64%) 61–45 (58%) 105.1 -0.83

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.