H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Guy Forget vs Leonardo Lavalle H2H: 2-0
Guy Forget holds a 2–0 lead over Leonardo Lavalle in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Guy Forget leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Guy Forget won the 1989 Monte Carlo second round 6-0 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 61
Left-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
MEX
Age 59
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 26, 1989* | Monte Carlo | ATP 250 | R64 | Clay | Guy Forget | 6-0 6-1 | Leonardo Lavalle | Match data |
| Mar 15, 1989* | Indian Wells | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Guy Forget | 6-3 6-2 | Leonardo Lavalle | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guy Forget | #1,367 | #4 | 2,392 | 2,038 | 356 | 279 | 56.1% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 11 |
| Leonardo Lavalle | #968 | #51 | 483 | 1,728 | 60 | 96 | 38.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Guy Forget | Leonardo Lavalle | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1982 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #70 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #87 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1983 | 7–23 | 23.3% | #94 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #105 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1984 | 17–12 | 58.6% | #36 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #224 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1985 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #61 | 1,723 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #64 | 1,659 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1986 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #25 | 1,791 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #132 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1987 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #54 | 1,750 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #183 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1988 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #48 | 1,769 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #133 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1989 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #36 | 1,798 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #99 | 1,600 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1990 | 38–23 | 62.3% | #16 | 1,799 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #309 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1991 | 57–19 | 75.0% | #7 | 1,985 | 0 | 9 | 1994 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #213 | 1,543 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1992 | 42–21 | 66.7% | #11 | 1,978 | 0 | 10 | 1995 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #362 | 1,543 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1993 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #158 | 1,861 | 0 | 10 | 1996 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #313 | 1,550 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1994 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #40 | 1,840 | 0 | 10 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #439 | 1,542 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 1995 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #71 | 1,694 | 0 | 10 | 1998 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #400 | 1,552 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 1996 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #51 | 1,690 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1997 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #1121 | 1,599 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |