H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 07:16 UTC
Guy Forget vs Nicolas Kiefer H2H: 0-1
Nicolas Kiefer holds a 1–0 lead over Guy Forget in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nicolas Kiefer leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Nicolas Kiefer won the 1997 Milan third round 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 61
Left-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
GER
Age 49
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 27, 1997* | Milan | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Nicolas Kiefer | 6-1 6-4 | Guy Forget | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guy Forget | #1,367 | #4 | 2,392 | 2,038 | 356 | 279 | 56.1% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 11 |
| Nicolas Kiefer | #720 | #4 | 2,447 | 1,984 | 343 | 252 | 57.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Guy Forget | Nicolas Kiefer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1198 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1982 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #70 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #206 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1983 | 7–23 | 23.3% | #94 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #128 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1984 | 17–12 | 58.6% | #36 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 26–16 | 61.9% | #32 | 1,798 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1985 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #61 | 1,723 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #35 | 1,790 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1986 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #25 | 1,791 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 53–21 | 71.6% | #6 | 1,921 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 1987 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #54 | 1,750 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 30–15 | 66.7% | #20 | 1,921 | 0 | 6 |
| 23 | 1988 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #48 | 1,769 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 26–25 | 51.0% | #42 | 1,766 | 0 | 6 |
| 24 | 1989 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #36 | 1,798 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #72 | 1,718 | 0 | 6 |
| 25 | 1990 | 38–23 | 62.3% | #16 | 1,799 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #58 | 1,727 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 1991 | 57–19 | 75.0% | #7 | 1,985 | 0 | 9 | 2004 | 32–19 | 62.7% | #21 | 1,897 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 1992 | 42–21 | 66.7% | #11 | 1,978 | 0 | 10 | 2005 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #22 | 1,854 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 1993 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #158 | 1,861 | 0 | 10 | 2006 | 14–8 | 63.6% | #48 | 1,843 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | 1994 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #40 | 1,840 | 0 | 10 | 2007 | 19–12 | 61.3% | #49 | 1,893 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | 1995 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #71 | 1,694 | 0 | 10 | 2008 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #38 | 1,876 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | 1996 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #51 | 1,690 | 0 | 11 | 2009 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #116 | 1,757 | 0 | 6 |
| 32 | 1997 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #1121 | 1,599 | 0 | 11 | 2010 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #722 | 1,717 | 0 | 6 |