H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Guy Forget vs Pat Cash H2H: 0-1
Pat Cash holds a 1–0 lead over Guy Forget in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Pat Cash leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Pat Cash won the 1987 Wimbledon fourth round 6-2 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
FRA
Age 61
Left-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 61
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 1, 1987* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R16 | Grass | Pat Cash | 6-2 6-3 6-4 | Guy Forget | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guy Forget | #1,367 | #4 | 2,392 | 2,038 | 356 | 279 | 56.1% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 11 |
| Pat Cash | #734 | #4 | 658 | 2,098 | 210 | 134 | 61.0% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Guy Forget | Pat Cash | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1982 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #70 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 17–10 | 63.0% | #63 | 1,697 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 1983 | 7–23 | 23.3% | #94 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 26–17 | 60.5% | #34 | 1,829 | 0 | 2 |
| 19 | 1984 | 17–12 | 58.6% | #36 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #10 | 1,905 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 1985 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #61 | 1,723 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 11–7 | 61.1% | #67 | 1,833 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1986 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #25 | 1,791 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 16–10 | 61.5% | #24 | 1,878 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1987 | 20–20 | 50.0% | #54 | 1,750 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 41–15 | 73.2% | #7 | 2,022 | 1 | 5 |
| 23 | 1988 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #48 | 1,769 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 23–9 | 71.9% | #20 | 1,949 | 1 | 5 |
| 24 | 1989 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #36 | 1,798 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #368 | 1,927 | 1 | 5 |
| 25 | 1990 | 38–23 | 62.3% | #16 | 1,799 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 18–10 | 64.3% | #81 | 1,872 | 1 | 6 |
| 26 | 1991 | 57–19 | 75.0% | #7 | 1,985 | 0 | 9 | 1991 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #108 | 1,806 | 1 | 6 |
| 27 | 1992 | 42–21 | 66.7% | #11 | 1,978 | 0 | 10 | 1992 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #203 | 1,817 | 1 | 6 |
| 28 | 1993 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #158 | 1,861 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1994 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #40 | 1,840 | 0 | 10 | 1994 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #511 | 1,767 | 1 | 6 |
| 30 | 1995 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #71 | 1,694 | 0 | 10 | 1995 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #250 | 1,677 | 1 | 6 |
| 31 | 1996 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #51 | 1,690 | 0 | 11 | 1996 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #765 | 1,616 | 1 | 6 |
| 32 | 1997 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #1121 | 1,599 | 0 | 11 | 1997 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #379 | 1,574 | 1 | 6 |