H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Hamad Medjedovic vs Federico Gaio.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hamad Medjedovic | 6-3 7-6(4) | Federico Gaio | Match data | Jul 17, 2023 | Q1 | Swiss Open Gstaad | ATP 250 | Clay |
1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hamad Medjedovic | #79 | #56 | 950 | 1,822 | 41 | 47 | 46.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Federico Gaio | #1,461 | #124 | 548 | 1,568 | 3 | 15 | 16.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Hamad Medjedovic | Federico Gaio | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2021 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #669 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2022 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #255 | 1,446 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2023 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #113 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2024 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #114 | 1,744 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2025 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #81 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2026 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #79 | 1,703 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #245 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #175 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #254 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #210 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #152 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #137 | 1,428 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #153 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #425 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Hamad Medjedovic | Federico Gaio | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 17 | 2021 | 1485 | 103.3 | +2.60 | -1.93 | 0.575 | 43.6% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.50 | — | — | — | +0.13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2022 | 1446 | 101.5 | -2.76 | -1.15 | 0.780 | 44.5% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.25 | — | — | — | -0.05 | 2010 | 1495 | 102.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2023 | 1621 | 121.0 | -1.13 | -1.45 | 0.880 | 48.1% | -109 | +42 | — | 43.8% | -0.53 | 2–2 (50%) | 2–4 (33%) | 102.4 | -0.21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2024 | 1744 | 128.9 | +2.50 | -0.91 | 1.088 | 51.0% | -102 | -7 | — | 50.0% | 0.00 | 5–3 (63%) | 5–5 (50%) | 102.7 | -0.72 | 2012 | 1482 | 99.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2025 | 1697 | 139.2 | +0.77 | +0.43 | 1.044 | 50.7% | -36 | +38 | -48 | 53.5% | +0.17 | 3–4 (43%) | 12–7 (63%) | 100.3 | -0.88 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2026 | 1704 | 134.8 | +0.29 | -1.15 | 0.931 | 49.2% | -73 | +135 | -88 | 47.0% | -0.35 | 3–5 (38%) | 9–6 (60%) | 100.0 | +0.12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 1505 | 112.7 | -0.95 | +1.71 | 0.637 | 42.6% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.50 | — | — | — | +0.01 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 1472 | 100.3 | -0.98 | -2.76 | 0.735 | 43.0% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.00 | — | — | — | -0.04 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 1478 | 103.6 | -1.30 | -0.39 | 0.899 | 48.1% | — | +54 | — | 40.0% | -0.60 | 2–0 | 1–1 | — | +0.37 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 1550 | 114.7 | +0.83 | -1.03 | 0.792 | 47.1% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.20 | — | 0–2 | — | -0.01 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 1488 | 103.6 | -1.90 | -4.23 | 0.859 | 46.7% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.33 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.04 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 1429 | 102.4 | +0.59 | -1.53 | 0.979 | 49.5% | — | — | — | 22.2% | -1.00 | 0–1 | 0–2 | — | +0.26 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1515 | 114.2 | -0.31 | -1.59 | 0.819 | 46.7% | — | -47 | — | 20.0% | -1.80 | — | 0–1 | — | -0.31 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 1478 | 99.3 | -0.15 | -1.03 | 0.806 | 45.8% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.50 | — | 0–1 | — | +0.03 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 1475 | 94.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 1466 | 97.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1822 | 134.3 | +0.63 | -0.61 | 0.979 | 49.7% | -64 | +58 | -65 | 48.0% | -0.19 | 13–14 (48%) | 28–22 (56%) | 103.6 | -1.83 | — | 1569 | 109.1 | -0.41 | -1.25 | 0.842 | 47.0% | — | +4 | — | 20.9% | -1.44 | 2–2 (50%) | 1–7 (13%) | 95.6 | +1.94 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aleksandar Kovacevic | 4 | 0 | 4 | Jan 13, 2026 | H2H |
| Arthur Rinderknech | 2 | 1 | 3 | Jun 16, 2026 | H2H |
| Felix Auger-Aliassime | 0 | 3 | 3 | Feb 12, 2026 | H2H |
| Daniel Altmaier | 1 | 2 | 3 | Aug 26, 2025 | H2H |
| Laslo Djere | 2 | 1 | 3 | Nov 9, 2024 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ricardas Berankis | 0 | 2 | 2 | Mar 26, 2021 | H2H |
| Radu Albot | 0 | 1 | 1 | Feb 3, 2022 | H2H |
| Diego Schwartzman | 0 | 1 | 1 | Sep 30, 2021 | H2H |
| Andrey Rublev | 0 | 1 | 1 | Apr 22, 2021 | H2H |
| Benoit Paire | 1 | 0 | 1 | Apr 21, 2021 | H2H |