H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Hamad Medjedovic vs Laslo Djere H2H: 2-1
Hamad Medjedovic holds a 2–1 lead over Laslo Djere in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Hamad Medjedovic leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Laslo Djere leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Hamad Medjedovic won the 2024 Belgrade semifinal 6-2 3-6 7-6(2).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Serbia
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
Serbia
Age 31
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 9, 2024* | Belgrade | ATP 250 | SF | Hard | Hamad Medjedovic | 6-2 3-6 7-6(2) | Laslo Djere | Match data |
| Oct 14, 2024 | Stockholm | ATP 250 | Q2 | Hard | Laslo Djere | 6-3 6-4 | Hamad Medjedovic | Match data |
| Sep 30, 2023* | Astana | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Hamad Medjedovic | 6-3 2-1 (ret.) | Laslo Djere | Match data |
| Apr 21, 2022* | Belgrade | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Laslo Djere | 6-4 7-5 | Hamad Medjedovic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hamad Medjedovic | #69 | #56 | 950 | 1,822 | 41 | 44 | 48.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Laslo Djere | #220 | #27 | 1,342 | 1,862 | 152 | 163 | 48.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Hamad Medjedovic | Laslo Djere | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2021 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #669 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #495 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 2022 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #255 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #186 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 2023 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #113 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #185 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 2024 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #114 | 1,745 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #88 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 |
| 2025 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #81 | 1,695 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #93 | 1,719 | 0 | 0 |
| 2026 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #69 | 1,765 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #38 | 1,712 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #57 | 1,770 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 23–26 | 46.9% | #52 | 1,690 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #70 | 1,764 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 33–25 | 56.9% | #33 | 1,815 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #115 | 1,734 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #98 | 1,692 | 0 | 3 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #220 | 1,649 | 0 | 3 |