H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 14:15 UTC
Hank Pfister vs Angel Gimenez H2H: 1-0
Hank Pfister holds a 1–0 lead over Angel Gimenez in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Hank Pfister leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Hank Pfister won the 1979 Memphis second round 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 72
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 70
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 28, 1979* | Memphis | ATP 250 | R64 | Carpet | Hank Pfister | 6-3 6-1 | Angel Gimenez | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hank Pfister | #982 | #19 | 0 | 1,926 | 260 | 213 | 55.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Angel Gimenez | #806 | #41 | 0 | 1,777 | 86 | 106 | 44.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Hank Pfister | Angel Gimenez | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #193 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #131 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1975 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #252 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #332 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1976 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #101 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 12–10 | 54.5% | #42 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1977 | 37–27 | 57.8% | #48 | 1,741 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 8–21 | 27.6% | #195 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1978 | 43–26 | 62.3% | #29 | 1,839 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #86 | 1,648 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1979 | 33–27 | 55.0% | #30 | 1,841 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #92 | 1,656 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1980 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #62 | 1,727 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #96 | 1,567 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1981 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #39 | 1,869 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #164 | 1,565 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1982 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #24 | 1,831 | 0 | 2 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #745 | 1,547 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 1983 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #41 | 1,749 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1984 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #86 | 1,722 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1985 | 12–10 | 54.5% | #68 | 1,763 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1987 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #595 | 1,677 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #980 | 1,654 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |