H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Hank Pfister vs Francisco Gonzalez H2H: 2-0
Hank Pfister holds a 2–0 lead over Francisco Gonzalez in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Hank Pfister leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Hank Pfister won the 1982 Columbus third round 7-5 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 72
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
PAR
Age 70
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 6, 1982* | Columbus | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Hank Pfister | 7-5 6-3 | Francisco Gonzalez | Match data |
| Sep 27, 1979* | San Francisco | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Hank Pfister | 6-4 6-4 | Francisco Gonzalez | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hank Pfister | #982 | #19 | 0 | 1,926 | 260 | 213 | 55.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Francisco Gonzalez | #997 | #40 | 0 | 1,758 | 105 | 157 | 40.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Hank Pfister | Francisco Gonzalez | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #308 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #272 | 1,455 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1975 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #252 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #212 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1976 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #101 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #61 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1977 | 37–27 | 57.8% | #48 | 1,741 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #77 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1978 | 43–26 | 62.3% | #29 | 1,839 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #74 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1979 | 33–27 | 55.0% | #30 | 1,841 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #98 | 1,659 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1980 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #62 | 1,727 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #98 | 1,685 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1981 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #39 | 1,869 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #99 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1982 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #24 | 1,831 | 0 | 2 | 1984 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #82 | 1,653 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1983 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #41 | 1,749 | 0 | 2 | 1985 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #140 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1984 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #86 | 1,722 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #548 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 1985 | 12–10 | 54.5% | #68 | 1,763 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1987 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #595 | 1,677 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #980 | 1,654 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |