H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Hank Pfister vs James Chico Hagey H2H: 0-1
James Chico Hagey holds a 1–0 lead over Hank Pfister in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, James Chico Hagey leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, James Chico Hagey won the 1976 Hong Kong fourth round 2-6 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 72
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 11, 1976* | Hong Kong | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | James Chico Hagey | 2-6 6-1 6-3 | Hank Pfister | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hank Pfister | #982 | #19 | 0 | 1,926 | 260 | 213 | 55.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| James Chico Hagey | #662 | #72 | 0 | 1,558 | 18 | 50 | 26.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Hank Pfister | James Chico Hagey | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1975 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #252 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | 1968 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 1976 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #101 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,458 | 0 | 0 |
| 1977 | 37–27 | 57.8% | #48 | 1,741 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,429 | 0 | 0 |
| 1978 | 43–26 | 62.3% | #29 | 1,839 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #188 | 1,429 | 0 | 0 |
| 1979 | 33–27 | 55.0% | #30 | 1,841 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #238 | 1,435 | 0 | 0 |
| 1980 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #62 | 1,727 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #73 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 1981 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #39 | 1,869 | 0 | 1 | 1977 | 5–23 | 17.9% | #200 | 1,421 | 0 | 0 |
| 1982 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #24 | 1,831 | 0 | 2 | 1978 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #436 | 1,416 | 0 | 0 |
| 1983 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #41 | 1,749 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1984 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #86 | 1,722 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1985 | 12–10 | 54.5% | #68 | 1,763 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1987 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #595 | 1,677 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #980 | 1,654 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |