H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Hank Pfister vs Jeff Borowiak H2H: 3-1
Hank Pfister holds a 3–1 lead over Jeff Borowiak in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Hank Pfister leads 3–0 on hard courts, while Jeff Borowiak leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Hank Pfister won the 1984 La Quinta second round 7-6 3-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 72
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
USA
Age 76
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 15, 1984* | La Quinta | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Hank Pfister | 7-6 3-6 6-2 | Jeff Borowiak | Match data |
| Jan 2, 1983* | Melbourne | ATP 250 | QF | Grass | Jeff Borowiak | 6-4 6-4 | Hank Pfister | Match data |
| Feb 18, 1982* | La Quinta | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Hank Pfister | 7-5 6-3 | Jeff Borowiak | Match data |
| Mar 26, 1981* | Napa | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Hank Pfister | 6-0 6-7 6-3 | Jeff Borowiak | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hank Pfister | #982 | #19 | 0 | 1,926 | 260 | 213 | 55.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Jeff Borowiak | #920 | #20 | 0 | 1,941 | 289 | 305 | 48.7% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Hank Pfister | Jeff Borowiak | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 6–10 | 37.5% | — | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 6–7 | 46.2% | — | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1975 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #252 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 26–20 | 56.5% | — | 1,782 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1976 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #101 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 20–28 | 41.7% | — | 1,828 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1977 | 37–27 | 57.8% | #48 | 1,741 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 21–33 | 38.9% | #82 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1978 | 43–26 | 62.3% | #29 | 1,839 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 34–27 | 55.7% | #40 | 1,853 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1979 | 33–27 | 55.0% | #30 | 1,841 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 32–27 | 54.2% | #48 | 1,804 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1980 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #62 | 1,727 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #60 | 1,720 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1981 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #39 | 1,869 | 0 | 1 | 1977 | 45–23 | 66.2% | #25 | 1,812 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 1982 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #24 | 1,831 | 0 | 2 | 1978 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #98 | 1,671 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | 1983 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #41 | 1,749 | 0 | 2 | 1979 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #125 | 1,614 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | 1984 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #86 | 1,722 | 0 | 2 | 1980 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #189 | 1,668 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | 1985 | 12–10 | 54.5% | #68 | 1,763 | 0 | 2 | 1981 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #52 | 1,763 | 0 | 5 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #94 | 1,740 | 0 | 5 |
| 33 | 1987 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #595 | 1,677 | 0 | 2 | 1983 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #98 | 1,651 | 0 | 5 |
| 34 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #980 | 1,654 | 0 | 2 | 1984 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #520 | 1,598 | 0 | 5 |