H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Hank Pfister vs Mark Edmondson H2H: 2-0
Hank Pfister holds a 2–0 lead over Mark Edmondson in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Hank Pfister leads 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Hank Pfister won the 1978 Birmingham second round 6-1 5-7 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 72
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 72
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 20, 1978* | Birmingham | ATP 250 | R64 | Grass | Hank Pfister | 6-1 5-7 6-4 | Mark Edmondson | Match data |
| Oct 13, 1977* | Brisbane | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Hank Pfister | 6-4 6-4 | Mark Edmondson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hank Pfister | #982 | #19 | 0 | 1,926 | 260 | 213 | 55.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Mark Edmondson | #525 | #15 | 0 | 1,927 | 244 | 231 | 51.4% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Hank Pfister | Mark Edmondson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1975 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #252 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #212 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1976 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #101 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 42–29 | 59.2% | #35 | 1,754 | 1 | 2 |
| 23 | 1977 | 37–27 | 57.8% | #48 | 1,741 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 16–24 | 40.0% | #99 | 1,598 | 1 | 2 |
| 24 | 1978 | 43–26 | 62.3% | #29 | 1,839 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #79 | 1,682 | 1 | 3 |
| 25 | 1979 | 33–27 | 55.0% | #30 | 1,841 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #95 | 1,740 | 1 | 3 |
| 26 | 1980 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #62 | 1,727 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #91 | 1,714 | 1 | 3 |
| 27 | 1981 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #39 | 1,869 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 59–26 | 69.4% | #23 | 1,902 | 1 | 6 |
| 28 | 1982 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #24 | 1,831 | 0 | 2 | 1982 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #18 | 1,713 | 1 | 6 |
| 29 | 1983 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #41 | 1,749 | 0 | 2 | 1983 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #37 | 1,687 | 1 | 6 |
| 30 | 1984 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #86 | 1,722 | 0 | 2 | 1984 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #145 | 1,572 | 1 | 6 |
| 31 | 1985 | 12–10 | 54.5% | #68 | 1,763 | 0 | 2 | 1985 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #115 | 1,595 | 1 | 6 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #307 | 1,540 | 1 | 6 |
| 33 | 1987 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #595 | 1,677 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #523 | 1,550 | 1 | 6 |
| 34 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #980 | 1,654 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |