H2H data updated: 2026-09-04 00:00 UTC

Hank Pfister vs Mark Edmondson H2H: 2-0

Hank Pfister holds a 2–0 lead over Mark Edmondson in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Hank Pfister leads 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Hank Pfister won the 1978 Birmingham round of 64 6-1 5-7 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Hank Pfister
USA Age 72 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
Mark Edmondson
AUS Age 72 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Hank Pfister #38 6-1 5-7 6-4 Mark Edmondson Match data Jun 20, 1978* R64 Birmingham ATP 250 Grass
Hank Pfister #54 6-4 6-4 Mark Edmondson #52 Match data Oct 13, 1977* R32 Brisbane International ATP 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Hank Pfister #982 #19 0 1,929 260 213 55.0% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Mark Edmondson #525 #15 0 1,927 244 231 51.4% 1 0 0 0 5 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Hank Pfister Mark Edmondson
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1972 0–1 0.0% — 1,496 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 1974 1–2 33.3% — 1,488 0 0
21 1975 0–4 0.0% #252 1,459 0 0 1975 2–4 33.3% #212 1,500 0 0
22 1976 8–12 40.0% #101 1,546 0 0 1976 42–29 59.2% #35 1,755 1 2
23 1977 37–27 57.8% #40 1,742 0 0 1977 16–24 40.0% #92 1,602 1 2
24 1978 43–26 62.3% #29 1,841 0 0 1978 15–16 48.4% #79 1,685 1 3
25 1979 33–27 55.0% #30 1,842 0 0 1979 26–26 50.0% #95 1,742 1 3
26 1980 21–25 45.7% #62 1,729 0 0 1980 18–23 43.9% #91 1,715 1 3
27 1981 37–21 63.8% #39 1,870 0 1 1981 59–26 69.4% #23 1,902 1 6
28 1982 35–21 62.5% #24 1,832 0 2 1982 27–25 51.9% #18 1,708 1 6
29 1983 19–17 52.8% #41 1,750 0 2 1983 16–17 48.5% #37 1,687 1 6
30 1984 15–18 45.5% #86 1,723 0 2 1984 9–18 33.3% #145 1,573 1 6
31 1985 12–10 54.5% #68 1,764 0 2 1985 9–10 47.4% #115 1,595 1 6
32 — — — — — — — 1986 3–9 25.0% #307 1,539 1 6
33 1987 0–4 0.0% #595 1,678 0 2 1987 1–1 50.0% #523 1,550 1 6
34 1988 0–1 0.0% #980 1,655 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Hank Pfister Mark Edmondson
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 — — — — — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
21 1975 — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1975 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
22 1976 4 5 9 44.4% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 1976 8 4 12 66.7% 19 20 39 48.7% 14 3 17 82.4% 1 2 3 33.3%
23 1977 9 6 15 60.0% 10 8 18 55.6% 16 8 24 66.7% 2 5 7 28.6% 1977 3 5 8 37.5% 7 10 17 41.2% 5 6 11 45.5% 1 3 4 25.0%
24 1978 10 6 16 62.5% 6 6 12 50.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 14 8 22 63.6% 1978 1 4 5 20.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 8 4 12 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3%
25 1979 6 9 15 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 12 6 18 66.7% 15 11 26 57.7% 1979 4 5 9 44.4% 5 9 14 35.7% 14 7 21 66.7% 3 5 8 37.5%
26 1980 6 7 13 46.2% 4 4 8 50.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 2 8 10 20.0% 1980 4 5 9 44.4% 4 8 12 33.3% 5 5 10 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0%
27 1981 22 9 31 71.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 14 5 19 73.7% 1 4 5 20.0% 1981 14 8 22 63.6% 9 9 18 50.0% 25 4 29 86.2% 11 5 16 68.8%
28 1982 10 9 19 52.6% 2 1 3 66.7% 20 7 27 74.1% 3 4 7 42.9% 1982 5 6 11 45.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 11 6 17 64.7% 8 8 16 50.0%
29 1983 9 6 15 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1983 8 6 14 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 4 6 33.3%
30 1984 8 6 14 57.1% — — — — 4 6 10 40.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 1984 1 7 8 12.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 1 4 5 20.0%
31 1985 11 6 17 64.7% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1985 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 6 6 12 50.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
33 1987 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
34 1988 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 95 74 169 56.2% 22 30 52 42.3% 96 53 149 64.4% 47 56 103 45.6% — 50 58 108 46.3% 59 76 135 43.7% 102 58 160 63.8% 33 39 72 45.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Hank Pfister Mark Edmondson
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 1497 101.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.13
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 1489 104.0 — — — — — — +36 42.9% -0.72 0–1 1–1 — +0.03
21 1975 1459 98.5 — — — — — +48 — 20.0% -2.00 0–2 1–0 — +0.30 1975 1501 106.2 — — — — — — +36 42.9% -0.67 1–1 0–1 — +0.53
22 1976 1547 123.5 — — — — +11 -71 +47 45.7% -0.20 3–5 (38%) 2–6 (25%) — +1.09 1976 1756 137.6 — — — — -128 -137 +160 56.1% +0.33 14–13 (52%) 18–8 (69%) — +4.22
23 1977 1743 140.1 — — — — -58 -137 +17 54.4% +0.11 14–9 (61%) 8–9 (47%) — +0.19 1977 1603 131.0 — — — — -25 +7 +221 47.7% +0.01 4–13 (24%) 3–4 (43%) — +1.28
24 1978 1841 145.9 — — — — 0 -227 +11 61.6% +0.92 12–10 (55%) 11–10 (52%) — +2.99 1978 1686 136.0 — — — — -115 -93 +199 47.3% -0.14 4–2 (67%) 4–2 (67%) — -0.12
25 1979 1842 151.6 — — — — +8 — +56 53.5% +0.39 10–11 (48%) 8–9 (47%) — -3.48 1979 1743 144.3 — — — — -89 -149 +141 51.5% +0.13 7–10 (41%) 7–8 (47%) — -0.24
26 1980 1730 143.8 — — — — -6 -128 +175 46.7% -0.19 7–6 (54%) 8–10 (44%) — -3.62 1980 1715 129.3 — — — — -68 -118 +111 46.5% -0.40 7–7 (50%) 7–4 (64%) — -1.75
27 1981 1870 147.1 — — — — -15 -300 +93 61.2% +0.53 9–6 (60%) 14–6 (70%) — -1.71 1981 1902 144.4 — — — — -56 -267 +89 62.4% +0.73 23–9 (72%) 20–5 (80%) — +2.48
28 1982 1833 143.2 — — — — -50 -232 +127 59.2% +0.47 9–6 (60%) 14–7 (67%) — -3.17 1982 1709 130.9 — — — — +33 -109 +214 51.2% -0.06 5–5 (50%) 10–8 (56%) — +0.35
29 1983 1751 142.3 — — — — +74 — +118 50.5% -0.02 8–9 (47%) 6–6 (50%) — -3.26 1983 1688 128.5 — — — — +28 -69 +179 48.2% -0.14 7–3 (70%) 6–7 (46%) — +0.63
30 1984 1724 131.5 — — — — +56 — +53 45.8% -0.40 6–5 (55%) 3–2 (60%) — -0.93 1984 1573 121.2 — — — — -16 +69 +224 39.1% -0.94 2–5 (29%) 5–5 (50%) — -0.75
31 1985 1765 136.6 — — — — +34 — -33 53.6% +0.43 4–4 (50%) 5–6 (45%) — -1.13 1985 1595 118.9 — — — — — +47 +142 42.9% -0.20 5–3 (63%) 3–7 (30%) — +0.58
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1540 111.0 — — — — -29 — +155 30.0% -1.37 1–2 (33%) 2–2 (50%) — 0.00
33 1987 1679 104.0 — — — — +22 — — 10.0% -2.10 0–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.12 1987 1550 100.5 — — — — — — — 37.5% -1.00 1–0 0–1 — +0.34
34 1988 1656 102.6 — — — — — — — 25.0% -2.00 — — — -0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1930 148.0 — — — — +4 -158 +75 53.9% +0.24 82–74 (53%) 81–73 (53%) 103.1 -2.69 — 1927 139.1 — — — — -40 -114 +151 50.9% +0.02 81–74 (52%) 86–63 (58%) 105.9 +1.57

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.