H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Hank Pfister vs Richard Lewis H2H: 2-0
Hank Pfister holds a 2–0 lead over Richard Lewis in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Hank Pfister leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Hank Pfister won the 1982 Melbourne fourth round 6-7 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 72
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
GBR
Age 71
Left-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 1, 1983* | Melbourne | ATP 250 | R16 | Grass | Hank Pfister | 6-7 6-2 6-2 | Richard Lewis | Match data |
| Aug 2, 1977* | North Conway | ATP 250 | R64 | Clay | Hank Pfister | 6-2 6-4 | Richard Lewis | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hank Pfister | #982 | #19 | 0 | 1,926 | 260 | 213 | 55.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Richard Lewis | #766 | #77 | 0 | 1,669 | 67 | 115 | 36.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Hank Pfister | Richard Lewis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #205 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #249 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #197 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1975 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #252 | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #166 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1976 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #101 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 27–29 | 48.2% | #77 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1977 | 37–27 | 57.8% | #48 | 1,741 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 3–17 | 15.0% | #258 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1978 | 43–26 | 62.3% | #29 | 1,839 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #108 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1979 | 33–27 | 55.0% | #30 | 1,841 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #245 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1980 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #62 | 1,727 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 6–8 | 42.9% | — | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1981 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #39 | 1,869 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #93 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1982 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #24 | 1,831 | 0 | 2 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #240 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1983 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #41 | 1,749 | 0 | 2 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #452 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1984 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #86 | 1,722 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1985 | 12–10 | 54.5% | #68 | 1,763 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1987 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #595 | 1,677 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #980 | 1,654 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |