H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

Hank Pfister vs Tom Gullikson H2H: 5-4

Hank Pfister holds a 5–4 lead over Tom Gullikson in their ATP head-to-head. Across 9 main-draw meetings, Hank Pfister leads 5–0 on hard courts, while Tom Gullikson leads 2–0 on carpet. Most recently, Hank Pfister won the 1984 Japan Open round of 32 7-5 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Hank Pfister
USA Age 72 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
5 – 4
9 main draw meetings
Tom Gullikson
USA Age 74 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Hank Pfister #105 7-5 6-3 Tom Gullikson Match data Oct 11, 1984* R32 Japan Open ATP 250 Hard
Tom Gullikson 6-3 6-4 5-7 6-2 Hank Pfister #125 Match data Jun 27, 1984* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Tom Gullikson 6-4 5-7 6-4 Hank Pfister #21 Match data Oct 28, 1983* R16 Tokyo Indoor ATP 250 Carpet
Tom Gullikson 3-6 6-2 10-8 Hank Pfister #19 Match data Jun 17, 1983* R16 Bristol ATP 250 Grass
Hank Pfister #60 5-7 7-6 6-4 Tom Gullikson Match data Nov 6, 1981* R16 Stockholm Open ATP 250 Hard
Hank Pfister #74 7-6 6-3 Tom Gullikson Match data Oct 4, 1981* QF Maui ATP 250 Hard
Hank Pfister #84 6-4 3-6 6-3 Tom Gullikson Match data Aug 7, 1981* R16 Columbus ATP 250 Hard
Tom Gullikson 6-4 7-6 Hank Pfister #60 Match data Feb 5, 1977* R32 Dayton ATP 250 Carpet
Hank Pfister 3-6 6-2 6-3 Tom Gullikson Match data Oct 21, 1976* R32 Sydney Indoor ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Hank Pfister #982 #19 0 1,929 260 213 55.0% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Tom Gullikson — — — 1,826 — — — 0 0 0 0 1 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Hank Pfister Tom Gullikson
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
21 1975 0–4 0.0% #252 1,459 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 1976 8–12 40.0% #101 1,546 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 1977 37–27 57.8% #40 1,742 0 0 — — — — — — —
24 1978 43–26 62.3% #29 1,841 0 0 — — — — — — —
25 1979 33–27 55.0% #30 1,842 0 0 — — — — — — —
26 1980 21–25 45.7% #62 1,729 0 0 — — — — — — —
27 1981 37–21 63.8% #39 1,870 0 1 — — — — — — —
28 1982 35–21 62.5% #24 1,832 0 2 — — — — — — —
29 1983 19–17 52.8% #41 1,750 0 2 — — — — — — —
30 1984 15–18 45.5% #86 1,723 0 2 — — — — — — —
31 1985 12–10 54.5% #68 1,764 0 2 — — — — — — —
33 1987 0–4 0.0% #595 1,678 0 2 — — — — — — —
34 1988 0–1 0.0% #980 1,655 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Hank Pfister Tom Gullikson
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
21 1975 — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1976 4 5 9 44.4% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1977 9 6 15 60.0% 10 8 18 55.6% 16 8 24 66.7% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1978 10 6 16 62.5% 6 6 12 50.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 14 8 22 63.6% 1976 4 4 8 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1979 6 9 15 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 12 6 18 66.7% 15 11 26 57.7% 1977 3 7 10 30.0% 7 8 15 46.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 8 6 14 57.1%
26 1980 6 7 13 46.2% 4 4 8 50.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 2 8 10 20.0% 1978 13 7 20 65.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 9 4 13 69.2% 8 7 15 53.3%
27 1981 22 9 31 71.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 14 5 19 73.7% 1 4 5 20.0% 1979 7 10 17 41.2% 4 4 8 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 8 11 27.3%
28 1982 10 9 19 52.6% 2 1 3 66.7% 20 7 27 74.1% 3 4 7 42.9% 1980 5 7 12 41.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 6 5 11 54.5%
29 1983 9 6 15 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1981 15 10 25 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 4 8 50.0%
30 1984 8 6 14 57.1% — — — — 4 6 10 40.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 1982 6 5 11 54.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 7 10 17 41.2%
31 1985 11 6 17 64.7% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1983 12 10 22 54.5% — — — — 10 6 16 62.5% 2 5 7 28.6%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — 8 5 13 61.5% 5 7 12 41.7%
33 1987 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 7 8 15 46.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
34 1988 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — 3 4 7 42.9% 1 3 4 25.0%
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 95 74 169 56.2% 22 30 52 42.3% 96 53 149 64.4% 47 56 103 45.6% — 78 81 159 49.1% 20 24 44 45.5% 49 40 89 55.1% 45 59 104 43.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Hank Pfister Tom Gullikson
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
21 1975 1459 98.5 — — — — — +48 — 20.0% -2.00 0–2 1–0 — +0.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1976 1547 123.5 — — — — +11 -71 +47 45.7% -0.20 3–5 (38%) 2–6 (25%) 98.4 +1.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 1977 1743 140.1 — — — — -58 -137 +17 54.4% +0.11 14–9 (61%) 8–9 (47%) 107.2 +0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1978 1841 145.9 — — — — 0 -227 +11 61.6% +0.92 12–10 (55%) 11–10 (52%) 105.0 +2.99 1976 1496 107.3 — — — — +59 +42 — 45.5% -0.30 2–3 (40%) 1–3 (25%) 95.6 +2.32
25 1979 1842 151.6 — — — — +8 — +56 53.5% +0.39 10–11 (48%) 8–9 (47%) 98.7 -3.48 1977 1642 135.7 — — — — +20 -32 -131 44.0% -0.73 4–7 (36%) 9–6 (60%) 103.1 -0.47
26 1980 1730 143.8 — — — — -6 -128 +175 46.7% -0.19 7–6 (54%) 8–10 (44%) 100.0 -3.62 1978 1817 146.1 — — — — +23 -219 -132 57.9% +0.54 9–7 (56%) 6–7 (46%) 103.2 -0.21
27 1981 1870 147.1 — — — — -15 -300 +93 61.2% +0.53 9–6 (60%) 14–6 (70%) 106.1 -1.71 1979 1715 150.4 — — — — +5 -74 -3 45.0% +0.19 3–8 (27%) 4–11 (27%) 92.0 -3.00
28 1982 1833 143.2 — — — — -50 -232 +127 59.2% +0.47 9–6 (60%) 14–7 (67%) 103.1 -3.17 1980 1712 135.7 — — — — +29 -86 -79 45.1% -0.35 6–7 (46%) 8–8 (50%) 98.1 -1.36
29 1983 1751 142.3 — — — — +74 — +118 50.5% -0.02 8–9 (47%) 6–6 (50%) 94.9 -3.26 1981 1775 142.4 — — — — +5 — -157 52.7% +0.14 5–5 (50%) 9–9 (50%) 100.2 -1.24
30 1984 1724 131.5 — — — — +56 — +53 45.8% -0.40 6–5 (55%) 3–2 (60%) 101.1 -0.93 1982 1779 139.9 — — — — +6 — -161 49.4% +0.04 3–5 (38%) 5–12 (29%) 92.6 -0.80
31 1985 1765 136.6 — — — — +34 — -33 53.6% +0.43 4–4 (50%) 5–6 (45%) 97.1 -1.13 1983 1730 125.9 — — — — -34 — -16 51.6% +0.21 14–9 (61%) 7–10 (41%) 101.0 +1.09
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1700 136.7 — — — — -25 — +44 51.6% +0.22 4–8 (33%) 11–18 (38%) 95.1 +0.24
33 1987 1679 104.0 — — — — +22 — — 10.0% -2.10 0–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.12 1985 1722 129.9 — — — — -60 — +143 49.4% -0.07 10–3 (77%) 9–8 (53%) 106.2 -1.17
34 1988 1656 102.6 — — — — — — — 25.0% -2.00 — — — -0.07 1986 1707 122.6 — — — — -53 — +96 36.5% -0.87 4–3 (57%) 6–6 (50%) 102.6 -1.61
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1677 99.7 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.80 0–1 — — +0.07
Career — 1930 148.0 — — — — +4 -158 +75 53.9% +0.24 82–74 (53%) 81–73 (53%) 103.1 -2.69 — 1826 143.4 — — — — -1 -74 -16 49.1% -0.01 64–66 (49%) 75–98 (43%) 96.9 -1.55

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.