H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Hans Schwaier vs Balazs Taroczy H2H: 1-0
Hans Schwaier holds a 1–0 lead over Balazs Taroczy in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Hans Schwaier leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Hans Schwaier won the 1985 US Open first round 6-7 6-4 7-6 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 62
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
HUN
Age 72
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 29, 1985* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Hans Schwaier | 6-7 6-4 7-6 7-5 | Balazs Taroczy | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hans Schwaier | #528 | #38 | 92 | 1,748 | 57 | 84 | 40.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Balazs Taroczy | #732 | #12 | 0 | 2,003 | 381 | 228 | 62.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 13 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Hans Schwaier | Balazs Taroczy | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1981 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1982 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #662 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 4–3 | 57.1% | — | 1,563 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1983 | 6–3 | 66.7% | #434 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #193 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1984 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #87 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 21–12 | 63.6% | #38 | 1,771 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1985 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #47 | 1,709 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #69 | 1,811 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1986 | 7–20 | 25.9% | #158 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 37–19 | 66.1% | #31 | 1,866 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1987 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #170 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 38–23 | 62.3% | #32 | 1,852 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1988 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #212 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 44–18 | 71.0% | #20 | 1,907 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1989 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #205 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #42 | 1,812 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 1990 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #361 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 46–16 | 74.2% | #22 | 1,931 | 0 | 9 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 45–17 | 72.6% | #15 | 1,937 | 0 | 11 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 43–24 | 64.2% | #27 | 1,859 | 0 | 13 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #52 | 1,781 | 0 | 13 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #43 | 1,748 | 0 | 13 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #157 | 1,643 | 0 | 13 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #382 | 1,641 | 0 | 13 |