H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Hans Schwaier vs Jay Lapidus H2H: 1-1
Hans Schwaier and Jay Lapidus are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Hans Schwaier leads 1–0 on clay, while Jay Lapidus leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Jay Lapidus won the 1986 Wimbledon second round 6-2 6-7 5-7 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 62
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 67
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 1986* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Jay Lapidus | 6-2 6-7 5-7 6-3 6-3 | Hans Schwaier | Match data |
| Sep 12, 1985* | Stuttgart Outdoor | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Hans Schwaier | 6-4 2-6 6-2 | Jay Lapidus | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hans Schwaier | #528 | #38 | 92 | 1,748 | 57 | 84 | 40.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jay Lapidus | #621 | #34 | 0 | 1,798 | 76 | 106 | 41.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Hans Schwaier | Jay Lapidus | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1981 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1982 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #662 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1983 | 6–3 | 66.7% | #434 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #272 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1984 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #87 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #184 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1985 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #47 | 1,709 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #283 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1986 | 7–20 | 25.9% | #158 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #283 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1987 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #170 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 26–17 | 60.5% | #40 | 1,777 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1988 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #212 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #81 | 1,635 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1989 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #205 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #65 | 1,672 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1990 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #361 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 11–25 | 30.6% | #150 | 1,621 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #145 | 1,626 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #234 | 1,551 | 0 | 1 |