H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Hans Schwaier vs Tomas Smid H2H: 3-1

Hans Schwaier holds a 3–1 lead over Tomas Smid in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Hans Schwaier leads 3–1 on clay. Most recently, Hans Schwaier won the 1988 Hamburg Open round of 64 4-6 6-4 7-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Hans Schwaier
GER Age 62 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Tomas Smid
CZE Age 70 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Hans Schwaier #180 4-6 6-4 7-6 Tomas Smid #38 Match data Apr 27, 1988* R64 Hamburg Open ATP 250 Clay
Tomas Smid #35 6-3 6-4 4-6 6-2 Hans Schwaier #71 Match data May 28, 1986* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Hans Schwaier #135 4-6 6-5 6-4 Tomas Smid #14 Match data Oct 3, 1984* R64 Barcelona Open ATP 250 Clay
Hans Schwaier #225 6-3 6-7 6-0 Tomas Smid #14 Match data Aug 9, 1984* R32 Indianapolis ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Hans Schwaier #528 #38 92 1,749 57 84 40.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Tomas Smid #975 #11 28 1,994 490 317 60.7% 0 0 0 0 9 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Hans Schwaier Tomas Smid
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1981 0–2 0.0% — 1,484 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1982 0–2 0.0% #662 1,468 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1983 6–3 66.7% #434 1,576 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1984 12–15 44.4% #87 1,660 0 0 1976 5–7 41.7% #154 1,542 0 0
21 1985 23–19 54.8% #47 1,710 0 0 1977 16–18 47.1% #62 1,639 0 0
22 1986 7–20 25.9% #158 1,547 0 0 1978 36–25 59.0% #36 1,799 0 1
23 1987 3–10 23.1% #170 1,515 0 0 1979 50–25 66.7% #27 1,871 0 2
24 1988 5–9 35.7% #212 1,507 0 0 1980 43–20 68.3% #23 1,923 0 4
25 1989 1–1 50.0% #205 1,523 0 0 1981 49–28 63.6% #28 1,854 0 4
26 1990 0–3 0.0% #361 1,482 0 0 1982 62–28 68.9% #24 1,893 0 6
27 — — — — — — — 1983 59–30 66.3% #17 1,903 0 8
28 — — — — — — — 1984 46–27 63.0% #16 1,840 0 8
29 — — — — — — — 1985 47–27 63.5% #19 1,804 0 9
30 — — — — — — — 1986 28–24 53.8% #54 1,723 0 9
31 — — — — — — — 1987 30–26 53.6% #31 1,730 0 9
32 — — — — — — — 1988 17–23 42.5% #115 1,657 0 9
33 — — — — — — — 1989 2–9 18.2% #453 1,536 0 9

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Hans Schwaier Tomas Smid
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1981 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1982 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1983 — — — — 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1984 1 4 5 20.0% 10 10 20 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1976 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0%
21 1985 6 5 11 54.5% 16 13 29 55.2% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1977 4 5 9 44.4% 10 8 18 55.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0%
22 1986 0 5 5 0.0% 6 14 20 30.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1978 4 5 9 44.4% 22 12 34 64.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 10 7 17 58.8%
23 1987 0 1 1 0.0% 3 9 12 25.0% — — — — — — — — 1979 6 4 10 60.0% 33 12 45 73.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 10 8 18 55.6%
24 1988 — — — — 5 9 14 35.7% — — — — — — — — 1980 15 6 21 71.4% 16 7 23 69.6% — — — — 12 7 19 63.2%
25 1989 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1981 15 7 22 68.2% 23 11 34 67.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 11 9 20 55.0%
26 1990 — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1982 10 4 14 71.4% 24 11 35 68.6% 2 1 3 66.7% 26 12 38 68.4%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 10 6 16 62.5% 36 12 48 75.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 8 9 17 47.1%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 10 4 14 71.4% 15 11 26 57.7% 4 1 5 80.0% 17 11 28 60.7%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 18 9 27 66.7% 18 7 25 72.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 10 9 19 52.6%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 7 5 12 58.3% 15 11 26 57.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 4 7 11 36.4%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 6 8 14 42.9% 18 11 29 62.1% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 6 11 45.5%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 6 6 12 50.0% 11 11 22 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 0 1 1 0.0% 2 8 10 20.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 7 16 23 30.4% 47 65 112 42.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — 111 71 182 61.0% 247 135 382 64.7% 17 15 32 53.1% 115 96 211 54.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Hans Schwaier Tomas Smid
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1981 1485 105.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.75 — — — -0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1982 1469 102.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1983 1577 125.8 — — — — — +24 — 63.2% +1.11 1–0 — — +0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1984 1660 135.6 — — — — -150 +46 — 47.8% -0.22 2–6 (25%) 3–4 (43%) — -0.80 1976 1542 125.7 — — — — -33 +68 — 51.6% +0.16 0–5 (0%) 2–4 (33%) — +0.89
21 1985 1710 131.5 — — — — -75 -32 — 51.4% -0.24 10–6 (63%) 10–8 (56%) — +1.28 1977 1639 136.8 — — — — -104 +44 -135 51.3% +0.20 1–7 (13%) 2–6 (25%) — +1.24
22 1986 1548 122.8 — — — — +7 +35 — 31.4% -1.19 4–4 (50%) 4–5 (44%) — -1.66 1978 1799 150.6 — — — — -122 +63 — 54.8% +0.44 11–8 (58%) 8–7 (53%) — +0.34
23 1987 1515 119.3 — — — — — +42 — 21.4% -1.82 1–2 (33%) 0–3 (0%) — -0.50 1979 1871 159.1 — — — — -70 +110 — 63.8% +0.89 7–7 (50%) 12–6 (67%) — -1.69
24 1988 1507 116.5 — — — — — +29 — 40.0% -0.74 3–4 (43%) 3–1 (75%) — +0.15 1980 1923 155.5 — — — — +11 +3 — 65.7% +0.98 7–5 (58%) 6–2 (75%) — -2.22
25 1989 1524 109.8 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.40 1–0 — — -0.25 1981 1854 157.2 — — — — +46 +62 — 60.1% +0.90 11–6 (65%) 15–9 (63%) — -1.40
26 1990 1483 103.6 — — — — — +37 — 12.5% -1.87 0–1 0–1 — +0.13 1982 1894 156.3 — — — — +23 +3 -326 63.8% +1.01 16–10 (62%) 14–11 (56%) — -0.62
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1903 155.6 — — — — -53 +56 -203 61.5% +0.89 12–9 (57%) 6–10 (38%) — -2.90
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1841 154.8 — — — — +61 -25 -66 59.9% +0.58 10–7 (59%) 10–11 (48%) — -1.32
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1805 149.1 — — — — +56 +68 -70 59.1% +0.51 14–6 (70%) 13–8 (62%) — +1.83
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1724 130.9 — — — — +7 +71 +37 52.3% +0.30 10–7 (59%) 6–15 (29%) — +1.95
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1731 138.3 — — — — -67 +83 — 53.2% +0.07 7–10 (41%) 16–9 (64%) — -0.84
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1657 139.2 — — — — +9 +87 — 41.8% -0.36 7–5 (58%) 4–7 (36%) — -2.59
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1537 102.8 — — — — — +74 — 25.9% -1.52 1–2 (33%) 0–3 (0%) — +0.70
Career — 1749 133.2 — — — — -73 +18 — 41.5% -0.63 22–23 (49%) 20–22 (48%) 101.8 -1.16 — 1994 155.1 — — — — -3 +56 -137 58.0% +0.58 114–94 (55%) 114–108 (51%) 99.2 -0.82

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.