H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 07:16 UTC
Harel Levy vs Andrew Ilie H2H: 2-0
Harel Levy holds a 2–0 lead over Andrew Ilie in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Harel Levy leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Harel Levy won the 2001 Scottsdale fourth round 6-7(6) 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ISR
Age 47
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 50
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 9, 2001* | Scottsdale | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Harel Levy | 6-7(6) 6-1 6-2 | Andrew Ilie | Match data |
| Aug 9, 2000* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Harel Levy | 3-6 6-3 6-4 | Andrew Ilie | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harel Levy | #1,024 | #30 | 1,023 | 1,732 | 43 | 83 | 34.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Andrew Ilie | #856 | #38 | 997 | 1,739 | 89 | 114 | 43.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Harel Levy | Andrew Ilie | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1998 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #224 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #161 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1999 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #183 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #346 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2000 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #59 | 1,646 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2001 | 15–25 | 37.5% | #78 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,586 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2002 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #252 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 28–29 | 49.1% | #54 | 1,632 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2003 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #111 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #50 | 1,602 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2004 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #247 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 20–28 | 41.7% | #66 | 1,622 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #464 | 1,502 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #286 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #384 | 1,457 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #161 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2008 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #248 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #119 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2010 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #342 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |