H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 07:16 UTC
Harel Levy vs David Prinosil H2H: 0-2
David Prinosil holds a 2–0 lead over Harel Levy in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, David Prinosil leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, David Prinosil won the 2000 Moscow fourth round 6-3 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ISR
Age 47
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
GER
Age 53
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 27, 2000* | Moscow | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | David Prinosil | 6-3 6-0 | Harel Levy | Match data |
| Jul 13, 2000* | Newport | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | David Prinosil | 7-6(5) 3-6 6-3 | Harel Levy | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harel Levy | #1,024 | #30 | 1,023 | 1,732 | 43 | 83 | 34.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| David Prinosil | #1,091 | #28 | 1,040 | 1,800 | 165 | 208 | 44.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Harel Levy | David Prinosil | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1998 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #224 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #125 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1999 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #183 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #77 | 1,633 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2000 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #59 | 1,646 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #130 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2001 | 15–25 | 37.5% | #78 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #50 | 1,708 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2002 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #252 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #39 | 1,779 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2003 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #111 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 16–26 | 38.1% | #89 | 1,633 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2004 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #247 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #78 | 1,622 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #66 | 1,672 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #286 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #38 | 1,788 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #161 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 7–22 | 24.1% | #132 | 1,606 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2008 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #248 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #229 | 1,593 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #119 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #276 | 1,521 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2010 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #342 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1063 | 1,515 | 0 | 3 |