H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 07:16 UTC
Harel Levy vs Hyung-Taik Lee H2H: 2-0
Harel Levy holds a 2–0 lead over Hyung-Taik Lee in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Harel Levy leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Harel Levy won the 2001 Nottingham third round 6-7(2) 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ISR
Age 47
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
KOR
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 21, 2001* | Nottingham | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Harel Levy | 6-7(2) 6-2 6-2 | Hyung-Taik Lee | Match data |
| Oct 12, 2000* | Tokyo | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Harel Levy | 6-2 6-4 | Hyung-Taik Lee | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harel Levy | #1,024 | #30 | 1,023 | 1,732 | 43 | 83 | 34.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Hyung-Taik Lee | #1,256 | #36 | 864 | 1,798 | 120 | 153 | 44.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Harel Levy | Hyung-Taik Lee | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1998 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #224 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #241 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 1999 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #183 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #283 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 2000 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #59 | 1,646 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #191 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 2001 | 15–25 | 37.5% | #78 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #90 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 |
| 2002 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #252 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #116 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 2003 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #111 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #87 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #247 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #56 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 |
| 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #286 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,668 | 0 | 1 |
| 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #161 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #107 | 1,618 | 0 | 1 |
| 2008 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #248 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #49 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 |
| 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #119 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #51 | 1,769 | 0 | 1 |
| 2010 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #342 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #107 | 1,629 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #871 | 1,597 | 0 | 1 |